INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INTO TRUE HISTORY

 

NEWSLETTER NO. 69 OF 16 OCTOBER 2014

 

1. NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS

1.1 Our friend Jagdish Kher of Pune sent us following E mail -  

If you wish to communicate with Mr. Narendra Modi directly please visit Website & he / his office will reply to you personally / directly.

http://www.pm.nic.in

 

I (Godbole) have E Mail addresses of some important BJP leaders if anyone is interested.

 

1.2 Killing of WPC Yvonne Fletcher – 30 years on!

On 17 April 2014 Daily Mirror reported on front page

30 years after WPC Yvonne Fletcher’s murder, the net is finally closing in on prime suspect.

 

In 1984, Twenty five year old Yvonne was sent to keep the peace at a demonstration. Libyan students were protesting against a crackdown on dissidents on April 17 when, without warning, a gunman opened fire from an embassy window, injuring several demonstrators and fatally wounding Yvonne.

 

In January 2014, shocking declassified messages intercepted by Britain's listening station GCHQ showed how the Libyan regime issued the chilling orders to “defend yourself" when faced with the unarmed demonstration.           

Police surrounded the embassy and an eleven-day stand off ended after the Libyan authorities mounted a similar siege at the British Embassy in Tripoli.  Fearing a bloodbath, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's Government decided to allow 30 people inside the embassy including those responsible for Yvonne's murder - to walk free.                                      

 

But would the British forget the death of this young WPC? No way

Daily Mirror’s above article gives details of the hunt for the killer

 

A £3million covert operation run from the British embassy in Libya has placed the family and associates of the prime suspect under 24-hour surveillance. An SAS snatch squad is on stand-by to seize former top-ranking Libyan official Matouk Mohamed Matouk, thought to be in his late 50s. The Foreign Office confirmed it was providing support to detectives from Scotland Yard and said last night: "We expect to see follow up very soon."

 

Two MI6 officers from the British embassy in Tripoli have been assigned to assist senior detectives, with the approval of Foreign Secretary William Hague.

 

Investigators have dished out cash bribes of up to £2,000 a time for information about

Yvonne's killers and have tried to encourage Libyan officials to talk. A source close to the investigation said: "This is a very significant development in the inquiry. The MI6 officers' task is to liaise with local people to find the killers of Yvonne Fletcher. The Yard wants it settled."

 

nick.sommerlad@mirror.co.uk

 

So, the British will not forget to bring to justice killer of one woman police constable even after 30 years. And we Hindus?

 

1.3 British justice

In July 2014 Andy Coulson, former editor of News of the World and one time Communications Director of British Prime Minister David Cameron was found guilty of Phone hacking. He was sentenced to jail for 18 months.

Afterwards Cameron said – Justice has been done. It shows that no one is above the law!

Our comments - Dear oh dear. What will happen if we follow that example in Hindusthan?

 

1.4 Heartless British Immigration

In March 2014 Yashika Bhageerathi, from Enfield, a bright student at Oasis school North London was deported to Mauritius. In 2011 she and her family were granted refugee status, but as soon as she turned 18 she became an adult and was not allowed to finish her education. She was deported just 2 months before her A level examinations – such are British Immigration Laws. Thieves, rapists and murders have Human Rights and can stay. They can claim right to family life and stay in Britain, but not this bright student.

 

Yashika’s case has highlighted the lack of compassion in our deportation system, the horror of Yarl's Wood detention centre. To deport Yashika at any stage, separating her from her mother, brother and sister, is heartless. To do so just weeks before she is about to complete her exams and get her education, is cruel. As one of her teachers I feel ashamed that our country could let a bright young person who has given so much to her community return to a life threatening situation. As a teacher, you want the best for your students, to see them excel and complete their studies. To know that they have a bright future. Yashika has made this country her home and put everything into her education, becoming a straight-A student. She's done nothing wrong and is being punished by bureaucracy.                                                                                                                       Zoe Thompson                                                                                                                       Deputy Principal, Oasis Academy Hadley

 

1.5 Case of Rolf Harris

On 4July 2014, famous entertainer Rolf Harris (originally from Australia) was sentenced to 5 years and 9 months in jail for string of indecent assaults between 1968 and 1986. Once proud Australians removed all signs of his memory. The Queen removed her portrait painted by Rolf Harris.

 

But this case opened a can of worms. Many cases of historical child abuse cases came to light, Rochdale, Lambeth (London) just to name a few. There were accusations that some high profile cases were suppressed. Strange enough, 120 files went missing from Home Office department when Leon Britten was Home Secretary. Even right wing former Minister Norman Tebbitt said, “There seems to be a cover up.”

British Government appointed Baroness Butler-Sloss to launch an enquiry, but within weeks she had to withdraw as her brother was accused of a cover up. We have to wait and see what unfolds.

 

1.6 Statue of Mahatma Gandhi in London

In August 2014 British Government announced that it is going to erect a statue of Mahatma Gandhi in Parliament Square in London.

We should ask, “If you love Gandhi so much why not send Gandhi Peace Mission to Syria? Or Iraq? In fact why no such mission was ever sent? In recent times such mission could have easily been sent to Darfur where hundreds of thousands of Africans were massacred by Arab Muslims or to South Sudan where Christians and Muslims are killing each other. How interesting that not one Briton is prepared to follow Gandhi’s path!”

Such moves are only made to fool Hindus.

 

1.7 Arrogance of Europeans today!

Modi's Minority Rights questioned in the European Parliament

 

On 5 August Godbole received an interesting E Mail

From: European Parliament, Member Office Press Release

 

Member of the European Parliament Viorica Dancila today put forward a question to the European Commission regarding the Prime Minister of India Mr. Narender Modi's past record in keeping minorities safe in India.

The question was directed under Rule 130 to the European Commission.                       The question raised

 

Question for written answer E-006046/2014 to the Commission

Rule 130

Viorica Dăncilă (S&D)

 

Subject:      Indian minorities

 

Following the general elections held in India last May, Narendra Modi of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was elected Prime Minister. However, recent reports in the international media have expressed great concern over Modi’s past record and nationalist agenda. Modi, a member of a Hindu nationalist party, has been criticised for his role in the deadly Gujarat Hindu-Muslim riots of 2002 in which more than 1,000 members of the Muslim community lost their lives. Modi was Chief Minister of the state at the time. India’s 1.3 billion population comprises a large number of minority groups, including Christians, Muslims and others.

 

Is the EU monitoring the situation in India regarding minority rights and the policy that the new Indian leadership intends to pursue on this matter?

 

Are the issue of the large proportion of India’s population living in conditions of extreme poverty and the initiatives that will provide greater access to education and food safety part of the ongoing EU-India FTA negotiations?

 

Given that national policies regarding minorities could potentially threaten peace and security in South Asia, including in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh and India, is the EU pursuing a collective agreement between these countries with a view to addressing such concerns?

 

 Question can be verified online by visiting

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-- or visiting  

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/parliamentary-questions.html

 

Press Contact

Karen Jones

Press Release Department

 

Our comments – EU Parliament has no business discussing internal affairs of another sovereign country like India. How would they feel if the treatment of Gypsies in EU was discussed in Indian Parliament? Moreover, they never discuss plight of minority Hindus in Pakistan or Bangladesh. Why?

 

1.8 Hunger in Britain

Tesco and Sainsbury, two main supermarkets now have food banks. Customers donate food (Soup, biscuits, tins of beans and similar items). These are then distributed by the Supermarkets to the needy. On 8 March we received following E Mail.

 

From: dgulhati@yahoo.com

To: TheBecoming@yahoogroups.com

 

 “Hunger has returned to Britain, with more and more people just one unexpected bill from empty cupboards,” the group said in an open letter published in the London Times on Wednesday. Calling the rise in hunger a “terrible social failing,” the letter said, “One in five mothers is skipping meals to better feed their children, one in four families are shrinking portion size and over 60% have cut the amount they spend on food in order to get by. Hospitals are seeing increasing numbers of people who are malnourished.”

It identified three crises as being responsible – food prices, which have risen 30 per cent in five years, wages that have fallen in real terms, and the benefit system, which has become “increasingly punitive in the use of sanctions.”

Chris Mould, Executive Chairman of Trussell Trust said: “We’re seeing people from all kinds of backgrounds turning to food banks: working people coming in on their lunch-breaks, mums who are going hungry to feed their children, people whose benefits have been delayed and people who are struggling to find enough work. It’s shocking that people are going hungry in 21st century Britain.”

It is estimated that one in five Britons are in poverty. Concerns over the rise in food bank attendance have sharpened in recent weeks. A letter by 27 Anglican Bishops to the government criticised it for not doing enough to address the problem. The government then published a report on food provisioning that confirmed that the rise in food banks was demand-led. The All-Party Parliamentary Group of Hunger and Food Poverty has announced that it will set up a formal inquiry.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/increasing-number-of-people-going-hungry-in-britain/article5761828.ece

 

 

1.9 Kashmir debate in British Parliament

On 11 September 2014, a debate was called by Liberal Democrat MP David Ward regarding Kashmir in Parliament.

We do not need to go into details of debate in British Parliament. It can be seen in Hansard – official record of such debates.

 

We need to note – British have always been anti-Hindu, even the so called Liberals are anti-Hindu. The earlier we remove the notion that for British, Hindus and Muslims are same, the better. Even today they will go to the extent of interfering in the sovereign internal affairs of India. What can we say about the British Raj?


Some may argue that Indian Parliament should debate Diego Garcia, which Britain ceded to the US by stealing it from Mauritius. To achieve this inhabitants were booted out of the territory of Diego Garcia and the other surrounding Islands belonging to Mauritius. They are still fighting for their rights to return to their home land. The displaced people of Chagos Islands are seeking redress in the British Courts which seem likely to order Britain to resettle them back in Chagos Island with compensation.

The question is – have we got guts?

British are reluctant to discuss the plight of the people of Baluchistan being persecuted and murdered daily by the Pakistani Army.

 

British need to ask some tough questions on Pakistan as to why despite suffering from terrorism itself, it continues to play a double-faced game when it comes to state funding of terror training camps, forced en masse exodus of up-to 700,000 Kashmiri Pandits by its sponsored terrorists and the exodus of Sikh and Hindu families fleeing persecution by an ever stronger Pakistani Taliban? Why is it that Christians continue to be persecuted daily and the Pakistani state remains a mere spectator of church bombings?

1.10 Domestic violence in Britain today                                                                               Domestic Abusers 'Not Being Brought To Justice'

By Ashish Joshi, Sky News Correspondent – Monday 28 July 2014 

The victims of domestic abuse are being failed by the Government because their abusers are escaping justice, claims Labour Party. The Opposition says more than 10,000 perpetrators have not faced justice because police forces are wrongly using community resolutions to deal with violence against women. Community resolutions were introduced to deal with low-level crime such as vandalism and anti-social behaviors. They are supposed to be used as an alternative to ending up in court. Victims are asked what they would like to see happen - it could end with an apology, compensation or remedial action like cleaning up graffiti.

In the words of West Midlands Police: "Community resolutions mean children and adults with no previous convictions need not be criminalised for one stupid mistake." But shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper claims the use of community resolutions to deal with domestic violence has more than doubled in the past five years from 1,337 in 2009 to 3,305 in 2013. "These figures are deeply worrying. Domestic violence is an incredibly serious crime. Two women a week are killed by their partner or an ex and 750,000 children will grow up witnessing domestic violence," she said.

"Some senior police officers say (community resolutions) are only used for first-time offences," said the shadow home secretary, speaking in Birmingham.

"The problem with domestic violence is we know by the point the victim picks up the phone and calls 999 there have usually been repeated cases of abuse before they became brave enough to call.”And the idea of taking an abuser to see a domestic abuse victim for a state-sanctioned apology to make amends is just dangerous.

“Far too often victims are trapped in a cycle of abuse that outsiders don’t take seriously and community resolutions risk perpetrating this."

But the Home Office has rejected Labour's claim that violent partners are escaping justice. It said: "No government has done more to tackle the abhorrent crime of domestic abuse than this government. Our groundbreaking Claire's Law will help protect women from abusive relationships, while domestic violence protection orders are cracking down on the destructive cycle of repeated abuse.

"It is not acceptable for the police to use out of court settlements for serious criminality and that is why the government is already reviewing how they are used."

But Labour says an inspectorate report "looked at 66 police cases of informal resolution, and judged that the resolution was inappropriate in 14". Women's charities and campaigners against domestic violence have backed Labour’s claims. They are worried community resolutions trivialise violence against women.

Jane Keeper from Refuge said: "Anyone with experience in domestic violence knows that most perpetrators regularly apologise.”It's a feature of the violence, they abuse, batter, they control, and in the middle of it every now and again they say sorry and they'll never do it again. "To have police encouraging this with perpetrators and keeping them away from being held accountable is just playing right into hands of those who perpetrate violence."

Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper also reported that two women a week are killed by husband / ex-partner.                                                                                                    

Our comment – if this is the situation in 2014 what was life like for women in Britain in 1860 at the height of British Raj?

1.11 Please do not say Adivasis

In 1953 Veer Savarkar had warned us that the word Adivasis (original inhabitants) was coined by Missionaries and must not be used. Missionaries implied that Adivasis are the original inhabitants of Hindusthan and Hindus have deprived them of their land and livelihood. Of course they say nothing about Adivasis of America, Canada and Australia.

It is strange how we follow into their trap and use the word Adivasi to describe Tribal people. We should say - Girivasis (those who live in mountains) or Vanavasis (those who live in forests)

 

1.12 Modi’s Government in New Delhi – some observations

(a) Expectations of many Hindus are too high. Rapid results are not possible.  Reforms take time to materialize.

(b) 1st priority – to get elected again for the 2nd time. All the mass media (controlled by foreigners) is anti-Modi so he must set them aside and communicate directly with the voters.

(c)There is a need to produce monthly bulletins pointing out how his reforms are going to make lives better.

For example,

- He has asked all ministries to look at out of date laws which should be repealed.

- When birth of child is registered, he/she will automatically be on voter’s register after 18 years. This will eliminate many cases of malpractices which removed names of BJP supporters from voters’ registers.

- He has removed need for true / attested copies for application for central government posts. Original certificates to be shown only if a candidate is to be employed.

 

Here is a classic case.

After the advent of ISIS some Indian nurses were trapped in Iraq. Modi’s government obtained their release. - splendid job says International Red Cross

 Shree Ashok Chowgule of Goa sent us following information  -                                          An international aid agency has said there were “very tense” moments for the Kerala nurses in Iraq and the Indian government has done a remarkable job of securing their safe passage home.  “The entire process was handled by India, we had nothing to do with it – what New Delhi has achieved is truly remarkable,” Sitara Jabeen of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) told The News Minute. “This conflict is not like any other conflict – the situation is extremely dangerous bringing people to safety is truly remarkable,” said Jabeen, the ICRC’s point-person for the Middle East.

It may be recalled that over forty nurses from Kerala were stuck in a hospital in Tikrit from where they were shifted to a few places before reaching Erbil from where they are flying home tonight.

At one point it appeared that there was no contact with the nurses amidst reports that they were being held hostage or taken from point to point to tend to the wounded. “How it happened and what happened is not more important than the fact that the nurses are safe – all that is what every country does to ensure the safety of its citizens,” the ICRC official said.

Our comments - Could this have happened under Nehru? No. The authorities would have said – why did they go to Iraq? We did not ask them to go. Now they must suffer.

This also has to be pointed out.

 

(d) We have seen many E Mails pointing out challenges faced by Modi, but no one mentions how we can help him.

(e) Modi must not remain one man band. He must produce thousands of mini-Modis.

(f) It is good to notice that people are increasingly becoming aware of role of NGOs in anti-Hindusthan activities, for example, Ford Foundation giving money to AAP.

 

1.13 Western mischief continues :                                                                                            Research on Dalit literature by European Universities

One of our friends drew attention an article in Times of India of 7 July 2014

(The breaking India forces at work! Another forum to beat the Indian system with a stick, which will be provided in the form of propaganda material by the local sepoys and NGOs working on their behalf. An article in today's Education Times (Times of India) Pune Edition)

 

RESEARCH ROUND-UP - IN THE FOREFRONT



Two European universities are building a network of scholars to organise a series of workshops and conferences across the world to facilitate the study of dalit literature. Aditya Harikrishnan reports

 

After emerging at the literary forefront in India post independence, dalit literature is now getting its share of international attention. A recently received grant allows Nottingham Trent University, in partnership with EMMA at the Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, France, to build a network of researchers who have studied this subject and are organising various international workshops and seminars.

 

The research network titled 'Writing, Analysing, Translating Dalit Literature,' is funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). Comprising academics from a host of universities including the MS University, Baroda, University of Michigan, US, English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, Leeds Metropolitan University, UK, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi, and New Your University, US, the network will discuss various studies being conducted in the field of dalit literature.

 

The initiative aims to create awareness about the literature internationally, where it has scant readership. Says Nicole Thiara, lecturer, School of Arts and Humanities, Nottingham Trent University, “The corpus of dalit literature is innovative and experimental in form and content and deserves attention from a wider academic audience internationally. The analysis of this literature in postcolonial studies will necessitate a revision of the field's primary focus on the relationship between coloniser and colonised and enable a more nuanced study of complex hierarchies with in Indian societies.“

 

The conferences and work shops are aimed at being platforms for exchanging ideas, facilitating discussion on as well as formulating re search agendas, and the stimulating further collaborations. “These exercises pro mote the study of dalit literature and will result in various publications (academic journal special issues, edited volumes and individual publications). They will also attempt to encourage individuals to consider such kind of literature and ensure that it goes beyond merely documenting dalit life and illustrating it, in support of the political agendas of the community and its leaders, “says Thiara.

 

Leveraging researchers who speak Indian regional languages, the network also aims to resolve complex is sues surrounding the translation of such literature. Its analysis in translation will form an important part of the networks' research agenda.

 

Thiara and her counterpart from EMMA at the Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, and Judith Misrahi-Barak, as principle grant holders are in charge of organising events, world over, until 2016, when the grant expires. Events that will be organised during this period will include symposiums at the University Paul-Valery, France and University of East Anglia, UK.

 

Also, in the pipeline are similar events in Mumbai, Pune, Hyderabad and Delhi. An           advising committee that comprises Indian, European and North American scholars, all specialists of dalit studies, has been set up to make these events relevant and attractive to a wide array of audience.

 

“Dalit literature is unique in the imbrications of political denunciation and literary representation. What we are interested in is to foreground the ways dalit experience is mediated in artistic creation and how such mediation con tributes to making the political message more urgent.“

 

While the literary works of the country's oppressed contributed greatly in the formulation of the discourse of cultural inequality in India, with this initiative, the knowledge of their lives and the marginalisation they were subjected to, owing to the complex hierarchical system of the then Indian society, is set to transcend national boundaries.

 

“The lack of awareness about dalit literature in the west seems wrong on many levels. The inclusion of non-academic audiences is also important in order to raise the profile of dalit literature out side India. Pursuing the study of this literature out of the Indian context will be controversial, but our intention is to contribute to a dialogue between Indian and non-Indian scholars, dalit and non-dalit academics and writers, and to encourage a critical approach that will benefit the academic world but also the general public, “concludes Thiara.

 

aditya.harikrishnan@ timesgroup.com

__._,_.___

1.14 America interfering in Indian affairs again!                                                                                              Our friend Sudhir Srinivasan sent us the following E Mail -

How John Dayal helps break India

A leading Indian daily reported on 6 April, 2014 on a US Congressional panel’s hearing on religious freedom in India. The report titled “Row over timing of US panel’s Modi remarks” referred to the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission (TLHRC)’s hearing titled “Plight of Religious Minorities in India” held on April 4th, 2014 in Washington D.C.


The purported objective of the hearing, as described by the Commission, was to “examine this [phenomenon of] polarisation in the context of the US-India relationship.” In a blatant attempt to interfere in the legitimate democratic process of another country, the Commission most unfortunately foments the impression that the Indian elections – one of the largest democratic exercise in the world – are being held in a “polarised” atmosphere where the religious minorities face discrimination. In a brazenly partisan attitude which points to the fact that India and especially the BJP-ruled states remain the target of sizable external Christian missionary-connected or supported conglomerates, the Commission interfering in India’s internal domestic affairs and law making institutions expressed its concern that the “Freedom of Religion Act” implemented “across five Indian States” has actually “exacerbated” “discrimination” and “intimidation” of minorities. In other words, the Commission, by generalising particular local issues and that too of quite a vintage, was essentially criticising the fact that this Act impeded the free activities of missionaries and the free flow of external funds within India for the purpose of “harvesting souls.” How or under which capacity does an external commission reserve the right to comment on India’s domestic laws and issues, is something that needs to be seriously debated.

In the months leading up to India’s 2014 national elections, there has been a rise in acts of violence targeting religious minorities and an increase in discriminatory rhetoric that has polarised national politics along religious and class lines.” These intervention-advocating sections are now unable to come to terms with the fact that India is at last on the threshold of a new era which shall see the emergence of a strong and determined leadership. They clearly feel unnerved at the fact that they shall eventually be in no position to dictate or tutor India’s external policies and shall have to reconcile themselves to the rise of India. “The report also states that the panel’s leading witness, USCIRF’s Katrina Swett, made “no secret of her concern over a Modi-led government coming to power” and that ‘many religious minority communities fear religious freedom will be jeopardised if BJP wins…

The Commission listed Mr. John Dayal, “Member, National Integration Council, Government of India” as one of the witnesses, who shall “focus on the human rights situation for religious minorities in India” and “provide recommendations for U.S. foreign policy relation to India.”

It is common knowledge that Mr. John Dayal was also closely associated with the activities of the Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council (NAC), especially in the body’s nefarious attempt at evolving a flawed and skewed Communal Violence Bill.

John Dayal has been a past master at misrepresenting India and especially Hindus and Hindu
organisations on foreign soil. A look at some of his past antics in this respect only exposes the claims of this Government that it has done much to project India’s image abroad.

The fact that it has time and again
harboured and patronised elements like John Dayal speaks of another plot. Let see how he has actually been involved in what can only be called the project of “breaking India.” In 2005 when the US Commission on Global Human Rights observed, on the testimony given by Kancha Ilaiah, another expert at denouncing India and Hindus on foreign soil, that “Converts to Christianity and Christian missionaries are particularly targeted, and violence against Christians often goes unpunished,” brother Dayal welcomed this criticism of India by a foreign agency as a “historic moment.”

As Rajiv Malhotra and Aravindan Neelakandan documented in their path-breaking study “Breaking India” when the US based advocacy group Policy Institute for Religion and State (PIFRAS) held a South Asia Conference, sponsored by “United Methodist Board of Church and Society and the National Council of Churches of Christ in the USA” John Dayal, as a participant, had contended that “minorities could not count on the Indian state to protect them, or to prosecute crimes committed against them.” Dayal’s repeated use of foreign platforms to denounce the Indian system and polity is something which has been largely ignored by the mainstream media as well as the powers that be – i.e. the Sonia Gandhi led Congress and UPA whose patronage he has continuously received.

Is it proper or civilised that the UPA-led and Sonia Gandhi-directed Government of India deputes a member of one of its own institution to discuss our internal affairs on foreign soil and allows him to provide a completely negative and unfounded picture of the Indian polity and state of affairs?

One must also ask whether the Prime Minister and Sonia Gandhi were in the know of this visit and whether John Dayal, as a member of the National Integration Council, had their consent and support in this matter. It is also necessary that John Dayal come out with his full testimony made before the TLHRC so that the truth may very soon be out on whether the Congress led UPA encourages and condones external interference and interventions into the internal affairs of India.

1.15 Pakistan honours Bhagat Singh

Our friend Sateesh Diwan recently informed us -

Pakistan celebrates Shaheed Bhagat Singh day today, 7 June 2014. The Lal Chauk in Lahore is named after Shaheed Bhagat Singh in spite of fierce protests from terrorist groups like Jamaat-Ul

 

1.16 Muslims dictate American policy

On Sunday, March 16, 2014, mahesh khorana <emmkaykhorana@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

 

Muslim Brotherhood infiltrates Obama Administration

Six American Islamist activists who work with the Obama administration are

Muslim Brotherhood operatives who enjoy strong influence over U S Policy

investigativeproject.org

 

Look who's new in the white house!              
Arif  Alikhan
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development  for the U.S. Department of

Homeland Security      

Mohammed Elibiary
Homeland Security Adviser
  
Rashad  Hussain
Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference(OIC) 
     
Salam al-Marayati
Obama Adviser and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council        
and is its current executive director
     
Imam Mohamed Magid
Obama's Sharia Czar from the Islamic Society of North America

Eboo Patel
Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships      

 
2. AROUND LONDON TOUR OF PLACES ASSOCIATED WITH INDIAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS

On 3 May 2014, Babasaheb Purandare, a well known Maratha Historian, had a function in London to promote his new book Shivaji the real hero. It was hosted by Maharashtra Mandal, London, but no one told him about the Special London Tour! Purandare also showed no curiosity in visiting historical places associated with our freedom fighters.

 

On 1 July (Tuesday) I conducted one tour especially for Shree and Sau Patil of Mumbai

 

26 July. It was extremely hot. Temperature in London was 29 degrees C. Still 15 persons participated. Lead was taken by Sau Aditi Kulkarni of Birmingham.

 

10 August - Lead was taken by Mr and Mrs Joshi of Milton Keynes. Ten people participated. We faced torrential rain, major disruptions on Main Line Railway, and some buses not running due to a cycle race in London. But our persistence paid off. It stopped raining after lunch and we visited all the places.

 

20 September

Seven people participated. Lead was taken by Dharmadhikari of Birmingham

 

4 October

This tour was specially arranged for Shantanu Bhadkamkar, an industrialist of Mumbai.

 

18 October

This was the last tour in 2014. Ten people participated. Smt Gore came from Slough. Though she had to use a walking stick she stayed till the last. So did all the others.

 

On 14 July we received an interesting Mail

This is Nupur Nanal. I am a photographer from Pune and currently in London for a project. I am staying with Pilookaka Nawathe whom I believe you know quite well. 

I am working on a project; photographing Maharashtrians migrated to different parts of the world. I found out about the historic tours you do of London and I think it’s very interesting. And would love to photograph that tour for my project. (I will be photographing you, taking people on the tour and showing them around, rather than the historic sights you are showing)

Unfortunately I am leaving London on 24th of July. Is there a tour taking place before the 24th, or is it at all be possible to prepone the tour?

I understand it’s an unreasonable question but I thought this would be an excellent addition to the story. Do let me know.

Nupur

 

 

3. BEHAVIOUR OF CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS TODAY

3.1 The Christians

3.1.1 Pope says about two percent of priests are paedophiles

Reuters – Sunday, Jul 13, 2014 / Tony Gentile

ROME  - About two percent of Roman Catholic clerics are sexual abusers, an Italian newspaper on Sunday quoted Pope Francis as saying, adding that the pontiff considered the crime "a leprosy in our house".

But the Vatican issued a statement saying some parts of a long article in the left-leaning La Republica were not accurate, including one that quoted the pope as saying that there were cardinals among the abusers. The article was a reconstruction of an hour-long conversation between the pope and the newspaper's founder, Eugenio Scalfari, an atheist who has written about several past encounters with the pope.

"Many of my collaborators who fight with me (against paedophilia) reassure me with reliable statistics that say that the level of paedophilia in the Church is at about two percent," Francis was quoted as saying. "This data should hearten me but I have to tell you that it does not hearten me at all. In fact, I think that it is very grave," he was quoted as saying. The pope was quoted as saying that, while most paedophilia took place in family situations, "even we have this leprosy in our house".

According to Church statistics for 2012, the latest available, there are about 414,000 Roman Catholic priests in the world.

The Vatican issued a statement noting Scalfari's tradition of having long conversations with public figures without taking notes or taping them, and then reconstructing them from memory. Scalfari, 90, is one of Italy's best known journalists. While acknowledging that the conversation had taken place, Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi issued a statement saying that not all the phrases could be attributed "with certainty" to the pope. Lombardi said that, in particular, a quote attributed to the pope saying cardinals were among the sex abusers was not accurate and accused the paper of trying to "manipulate naive readers".

Last week, the Argentine pope held his first meeting with victims of sexual abuse by priests. He told them the Church should "weep and make reparation" for crimes that he said had taken on the dimensions of a sacrilegious cult. He vowed zero tolerance for abusers and said bishops would be held accountable if they covered up crimes by priests in their diocese.

(Reporting By Philip Pullella; Editing by Rosalind Russell)                                                    Some interesting reactions

(1) Sean Brady is still the primate of Eire and is still guilty of covering up for active paedophile Priests that he moved on several times to find more victims, (one of whom committed suicide as a result of Sean Brady's acceptance of his misdeeds). The Vatican knows all about this and pretends that it did not happen

(2) There are paedophiles in every church, believe me the Catholic Church is far from being the only one. I met a women at a hairdressers many years ago she was crying her husband had sexually abused his children so much that they would never be normal and she had a phone call from his church warning her not talk

(3) Pope says 2%,which doesn't sound a lot, but if there was 2% of paedophiles in Britain's, let's say 70 million--2 in a hundred, 20 in a thousand, 20,000 in a million, and 1.4 million in 70 million. 2% Sounds a lot to me, and I would suggest, underestimated.

(4) It is about time that ALL churches - whether Catholic or Protestant - cleaned their houses of paedophilia and sacked those who are guilty, at the same time giving their names of the perpetrators to the police so that they can be brought to justice!
For too long, the Church has protected these...

(5) It’s all of them I am afraid, Clergy, MPs anyone who feels they are above the Law. The only reason Homosexual Marriage was made legal is because loads of MPs are bent and it is all coming out now about Thatcher’s Rent Boy MPs. There will be a lot of disturbing facts that come out and some massive cover up

if the numbers can be trusted as accurate, (which I doubt) to quantify the kiddy fiddlers into a percentage of the total amount of priests they must know EXACTLY who the kiddy fiddlers are to count them so why are they still priests?

3.1.2 Paedophiles in Church of England

Press Association - The Archbishop of Canterbury says the church must be transparent in dealing with past child sex abuse – 13 July 2014

An inquiry into allegations of child sex abuse at the heart of the establishment is likely to turn up fresh claims about the Church of England, the Archbishop of Canterbury has admitted. The Most Rev Justin Welby said it was something he dealt with daily and it was becoming clearer that "for many, many years things were not dealt with as they should have been dealt with".

Abuse survivors must now be shown justice and the Church must be "absolutely transparent" every step of the way, he told BBC One's Andrew Marr Show.  Asked if he was braced for the inquiry to uncover "bad stories", Archbishop Welby replied: “I would love to say there weren't, but I expect there are. There are in almost every institution in this land. "This is, it's something I deal with every day and it is becoming clearer and clearer that for many, many years things were not dealt with as they should have been dealt with.

"And we must show justice to survivors of abuse. That is the first and absolute principle. And we must be absolutely transparent in every possible way and we have to keep saying how utterly devastated we are with the terrible things that were done in the past and how sorry we are."

It comes after the Home Office was yesterday again forced to defend the appointment of Baroness Butler-Sloss to run the inquiry amid claims she refused to go public about a bishop implicated in a scandal.

Lady Butler-Sloss told a victim of alleged abuse she did not want to include the allegations in a review of how the Church of England dealt with two paedophile priests because she "cared about the Church" and "the press would love a bishop", it was claimed.

It put fresh pressure on the former High Court judge, who has faced calls to step down after reports that her brother Sir Michael Havers tried to prevent ex-MP Geoffrey Dickens airing claims about a diplomat in Parliament in the 1980s.

Lady Butler-Sloss insisted that she has "never" put the reputation of an institution ahead of justice for victims.

Home Office minister James Brokenshire said there would be a panel of experts to sit alongside Lady Butler-Sloss.  Asked if there could be co-chairs with equal powers, he told Murnaghan on Sky News: "I think it's this precise detail that we are working on at this stage because it is important that we do draw on the right experts."  He added: "I think that Baroness Butler-Sloss's integrity shines through."

Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper repeatedly dodged questions over whether Labour backed Lady Butler-Sloss as the right person to chair the inquiry. She told Murnaghan: "I think she is an extremely experienced person who will be very good to do this job but she also needs the right people around her, she needs the Home Office to take action to make sure they address all of these concerns.  "If they can't they will need to make changes and rethink the whole thing but I think the ball should be in the Home Office's court now to set this up in the right way and to make sure they can do that because I do think she has immense expertise that should be drawn upon."

Some comments

How can she be impartial as in a paper today her own brother was named as a man who went to homosexual parties where underage boys were employed for various very well known men. All of this will be the usual whitewash & less "important" men will be named as in the usual cover up.

Lady Butler-Sloss should stand down immediately from this post and it should be given to someone who genuinely cares about the victims of abuse. The fact that she did not want a Bishop named in a sex abuse scandal speaks volumes.

For me, the gap between (then) teenage girls being "touched inappropriately" at TV shows usually by other young people at the time and sometimes repeating the encounters - and the vulnerability of children, removed from homes and boarding schools to be raped by groups of adults, is so vast.

This inquiry must not be allowed to turn into a 'let's look everywhere but inside parliament' one or the guilty will get away with it again. It should start there instead.

Mr. Bishop never lets on what he reckons justice would look like. The nobend seems to have an opinion on everything else but, strangely, not on this subject. Fancy that.

A lot of Tory MPs don’t see anything wrong, they went to public school, were buggered by their teachers and then rented out to MPs, judges etc to be buggered again, probably for money, "keep your gob shut do as you are told and you will get a good job later in life".

3.2 The Muslims                                                                                                               

On 24 August 2009 we received an interesting E Mail from S Kumar

Destruction of Islamic Architectural Heritage in Saudi Arabia: A Wake-up Call

http://islam21.net/friday/19-05-06.html Saeed Shehabi (PhD), Chairman of IFID, London,

 

In year 2002, Dr Ahmad Zaki Yamani, the former Oil Minister of Saudi Arabia, delivered a lecture at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, on a subject that had not been openly discussed at this level. Dr Yamani’s lecture was about a project that he had undertaken to excavate the site of the Holy Prophet’s house in Makkah. A team of more than 300 workers, engineers, archaeologists and other experts worked over a 24-hour period, excavated the house, took detailed images of its design and structure, and filled it with sand before they left. When Dr Yamani was asked why the house was hidden again, he said that there were powerful people in his country who would object to the whole operation, arguing that it was blasphemous to glorify anyone but God.

During this year, 2006, the extent of the destruction of historic Islamic monuments has come to light with devastating impact. It is now estimated that more than 90 per cent of historic mosques, mausoleums and other artefacts have been erased from the face of the earth, to the extent that some Saudi voices, especially from the Hejaz, have begun to question the wisdom of the eradication of the country’s historic wealth. The policy of destruction and enmity to anything that is of symbolic value has now crossed the borders of Saudi Arabia to other countries. The destruction in February 2006 of the ninth-century tomb of Samarra in Iraq has extended the boundaries of this policy to other parts of the Arab and Muslim world. There is now a growing fear that other monuments and mausoleums in Iraq and elsewhere may be targeted by elements loyal to the Salafi School of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al Wahabi, the godfather of the most destructive force in the Muslim world.

The extremism of today’s Salafi movement has become a force of annihilation, which spares no one in its drive to dominate the Muslim world. It is closely linked to the Wahhabi movement founded by Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al Wahab (1703–1792 ac). His aim was to purify Islam by returning all Muslims to what he believed were its original principles as typified by al Salaf al Şalihīn (the earliest converts to Islam). He rejected what he regarded as corruption introduced by bid‘a (innovation, reformation) and shirk (idolatry). During his lifetime, he denounced the practices of various sects of Sufism as heretical and unorthodox, such as their veneration of saints. Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al Wahab revived interest in the works of an earlier scholar, Ibn Taymiyyah (661–728ah/1263–1328ac) and his disciple, Ibn al Jawziyyah (d. 1350 ac). Ibn Taymiyyah was reported to have said: “The leaders of Islam agreed that it is not permitted to build the mausoleums over the graves. They cannot be considered mosques and praying in them is not permitted.” Later, Ibn Jawziyyah said: “The mausoleums that are built on graves must be demolished.” Seven centuries had passed after the advent of Islam with none of the scholars raising the issue. Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al Wahab, who came four centuries after Ibn Jawziyyah, went further in his extremism and adopted doctrines that label people with differing views as unbelievers and polytheists. Those falling into these categories, according to him, were worthy of nothing but extermination. Their lives deserved no sanctity, their wealth could be plundered and their families could be enslaved or killed. The legacy of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al Wahab has not only survived for two centuries, but has also acquired new international dimensions. Extremists are now distributed over the five continents and are threatening not only non-Muslims but also the very fabric of the Muslim Ummah, which is being destroyed in the rising sectarian discord promoted by followers of the neo-Salafis.

Within Saudi Arabia itself, fear has become a major factor in silencing the voices of dissent. Despite the atrocities of recent years, which are committed by the neo-Wahhabis and neo-Salafis against non-Muslims as well as Muslims, the Saudi government has refused to disengage from its historic pact with the Wahhabis.

Earlier this year (2006), the grave of Hashim ibn ‘Abd Manaf, Prophet Muhammad’s grandfather, in the Palestinian city of Gaza was desecrated. Mr. ‘Abd al Latif Hashim, the Director of the Documentation Department at the Palestinian Ministry of Endowments, accused the Salafis and Wahhabis of carrying out this heinous act, and described the destruction of the grave as the loss of a historic monument in Palestine. The desecration was in line with the pattern of destruction followed by the Wahhabis over the past two centuries. Muslims consider these acts a disaster for the Muslim world for several reasons.

Historically, the destruction of graves goes back to the early days of Islam, although at that time, it was carried out for different reasons. In 236 ah/850 ac, the Abbasid Caliph, al Mutawakkil, ordered the destruction of Imam Hussain’s grave. The earth was levelled and the ground flooded with water. It was a political revenge for the rebellion against the Abbasid rule, spearheaded by followers of the descendants of the Holy Prophet. It was an act to prevent the use of this holy site becoming a centre for the opposition to the Abbasids. Attacks on graves on the early days of Islam were motivated by politics rather than religion. However, during the past two centuries, enmity against religious symbolism has been presented with the support of religious edicts in line with the teachings of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al Wahab. Visiting tombs of disciples or faith symbols has been equated to polytheism (shirk), which is liable to the maximum punishment. Tension with other schools of jurisprudence has escalated and a state of religious polarization has been forming in the Muslim world. The present Saudi rule in the early twentieth century is a marriage of convenience between the Salafi trend based on Wahhabi traditions and the Saudi ambitious political agenda. Relations among Muslims have become strained as the Salafi movement has taken root in many places, thanks to the Saudi petrodollars that have been abundant since the mid-1970s as a result of the oil boom. Two hundred years ago, the Saudi–Wahhabi alliance wreaked havoc in Iraq. When its forces invaded the country in 1816, they destroyed the mausoleum of Imam Hussain and other sacred places before they left.

The Arabian Peninsula became the launching pad for the new politico-religious trend. This led to the destruction of more than 90 per cent of Islamic monuments, holy places, tombs and mausoleums. Anything that had symbolic significance unrelated to the Wahhabi school of thought was deemed “polytheistic” and faced destruction. In 1924, ‘Abd al ‘Aziz ibn Sa‘ud and his troops occupied Makkah in the region of Hejaz. Among their first actions was the destruction of al Mu’alla graveyard, which contained the grave of Khadijah, Prophet Muhammad’s wife, and that of his uncle, Abu Talib. Two years later, in 1926, Ibn Sa‘ud occupied Madinah and demolished the tombed mausoleum over the graves of several of Prophet Muhammad’s descendants, including those of his daughter, Fatimah, and his grandson, Hassan ibn ‘Ali. Since no tangible resistance to their heinous actions was mounted by Muslims, they went even further and demolished the famous Seven Mosques of Salman al Farisi, Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, Fatimah, ‘Ali, al Qiblatayn and al Fath. Their sites have been transformed into banking facilities such cash dispensing machines.

The pain of the people of the Hejaz has become so intense that their journalists have begun to raise their voices. On 10 September 2004, Muhammad al Dubaisi wrote in the newspaper, al Madinah, an article entitled “The destruction of these mosques has deprived Madinah of one pillar of its immortal history, and a minaret of its traditional glory”. Saleh al Fawzan, a Salafi writer, contributed an article in response a week later to the same newspaper, justifying the destruction of the historic mosques.

The Wahhabis have gone even further. They have demolished the grave and tomb of Hamza ibn ‘Abd al Mutallib, Prophet Muhammad’s uncle. They have cleared the graveyard of the martyrs of Uhud (the second battle of Prophet Muhammad after the Conquest of Madinah). The routes of the battles of Badr and Uhud (first and second battles of Prophet Muhammad) have also been cleared. Serious consideration is now being given to the idea that the Cave of Hirā’ (where Prophet Muhammad received God’s Message from the Angel Gabriel) should be destroyed. This is not a building, but a cave in the mountain. Four years ago, heavy demolition equipment, including excavators, were dispatched to desecrate the mausoleum of Sayyid ‘Ali al Araidhi (d. 825 ac). On 12 August 2002, the grave of this respected figure (the son of Imam Jaffar al Sadiq) was removed from the face of the earth. An order is now in place to desecrate the grave of one of Prophet Muhammad’s Companions, Rafa‘ah ibn Rafi‘al Zurqi. He took part in the battles of Badr, Uhud and al Khandaq. He also participated in the Bay‘at al Ridwan. An adjacent historic mosque known as al Khandiq is due for destruction. Another symbolic site has recently been desecrated. The birthplace of Prophet Muhammad has been removed and new toilets built on the site. There is also a plan to separate Prophet Muhammad’s grave from his mosque in preparation for the desecration of the grave itself. The connecting doors between the two sites are regularly closed as a prelude to the implementation of the plan. It is known, too, that the Ka‘bah has not been spared the heinous actions of the Wahhabis. Early in 2006, many of the artefacts and historic items inside it have been removed and destroyed, including engraved writings, silk ornaments and curtains.

On 25 August 2005, the web site of al ‘Arabiyyah (the leading Saudi satellite channel) published an important article with the title, “A new plan for Madinah angers archaeologists …. Historians and intellectuals call for a review of the destruction of artefacts in Makkah and Madinah”. The article argued that these artefacts cannot lead to religious inventions and must not be destroyed. It quoted Dr Anwar Ishqi, a renowned thinker, as refuting the arguments that these historic items can create religious confusion and it called for the protection of the mere 10 per cent that have so far been spared destruction. Another thinker, Dr Sami Anqawi, a senior researcher in the artefacts of Makkah and Madinah and a former Director of Pilgrimage Research, called for a comprehensive view of the Muslim scholars, and confirmed that only a small percentage of historic works remain and that the continued destruction will bury Islamic history and civilization. On the same day, the Saudi daily newspaper, al Watan, confirmed that a new plan for Madinah would certainly destroy one of the most important historic quarters of the city. The area of Shraibat would be annihilated in the following months, together with all the sites relating to early Islamic and Prophetic history.

Our comment – This is indeed good news

 

4 Historical research

4.1 Rationalism of Veer Savarkar

 

In January 2010 Heidelberg University in Germany published a 29 page paper on Savarkar. Godbole’s book Rationalism of Veer Savarkar is included in the Bibliography. Details are -

 

Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar’s ‘Strategic Agnosticism’:

A Compilation of his Socio-Political Philosophy and Worldview by Siegfried O. Wolf

 

This was first noticed by Dr Shridhar Vaidya in January 2014

This was then noticed by A P Joshi of Chennai

Dr Bedekar of Thane (31 May)

Vinoo Wadher of London

S Kalyanaraman (31 May) FHRS_USA group / also Media_ Monitor5@yahoogroups.com

 

http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2014/05/veer-savarkars-strategic-agnosticism.html

 

http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/10414/1/HPSACP_Wolf.pdf

 

On 29 August I spoke about Rationalism of Veer Savarkar at Ganapati function at Slough Hindu Mandir. Audience were 150 in number. It was surprising to see so many non-Marathi people at this function. They all appreciated my talk.

 

4.2 Research work of Shridhar Damle of Chicago

(i) Nehru national library has microfilms of some 25,000 letters to and from Savarkar. Cost of copying them is Rs 20 each. If enough funds are donated to Savarkar National Memorial, Dadar, Mumbai this valuable material can be made available to researchers

 

(ii) Shree Damle has got 18 pages about Savarkar, Madam Cama and Shyamji Krishnavarma in Russian language from a book written in 1912. With help from Savarkar.org and Savarkar Pratisthan these will be translated into English. If you know Russian you can contact Shree Damle.

 

(iii) He has found confidential report of American Vice Consul of Bombay to Department of State about his one hour meeting with Veer Savarkar in February 1944. He will get more than 10 confidential files of US Offices about Savarkar during his visit to US National archive. He has official permission.

 

(iv) Shree Damle has visited Government archives in Bhopal, Calcutta and Delhi. After struggling for 8 months with Maharashtra Government, Home Office, he has got clearance to study Bombay CID reports about Veer Savarkar, but no permission to photocopy or take pictures. This may change after new elections in Maharashtra

 

4.3 Jana Gana Mana – the folly continues

We still find it mentioned in some E Mails that Jana Gana Mana was composed by Ravindranath Tagore to welcome King George V and Queen Mary at the time of Delhi Darbar of 1911. But when people visit our web-site www.satyashodh.com they know the truth.

 

4.4 Why was Gandhi killed in January 1948?

(a) This is an important issue which has been badly dealt with by Hindutvavadis and our opponents will not stop using Gandhi’s assassination to malign us. I therefore started to write a book but my computer crashed three times.

Over the years I had dealt with many aspects of the subject. I have now collected all the material together.

There is a lot to do and this time my work is saved on 2 drives. So my work will not be lost.

 

(b) What were the conditions set down by Gandhi to end his fast in January 1948?

People are blissfully unaware of them. Some say –“We all know that it was giving away 55 crores of rupees to Pakistan.” Gandhi had been very crafty.

On 13 January 1948 Times of India reported on front page

Mahatma Gandhi Starting Fast From Today

Surprising Delhi Announcement

Move to Bring about Hindu Muslim Unity.

ORDEAL FOR INDETERMINATE PERIOD

 

New Delhi January 12

Mahatma Gandhi told his prayer meeting this evening that he was undertaking a fast from tomorrow for an indeterminate period to bring about Hindu Muslim Unity

 

There is no mention of 55 crores of rupees.

 

The conditions laid down by Gandhi are given in Maulana Azad’s book India Wins Freedom (pages 218/219). There is cleverly no mention of 55 crores of rupees. If we read the seven conditions today, it will make our blood boil. It is amazing that though Azad’s book was published in 1959, Gandhi’s conditions remain unknown to Hindutvavadis after 55 years!

 

(c) Some friends had recommended that I should read 2nd edition of The Men who killed Gandhi by Manohar Malgaonkar published by Lotus Collection in 2008. I did but found that it is Party Political Broadcast on behalf of Gandhi. Malgaonkar says that he was living in New Delhi next door to Birla’s house where Gandhi was staying and was killed. Malgaonkar is unable to create the atmosphere in New Delhi at that time. Gandhi himself had confessed to have committed Himalayan Blunders. Malgaonkar does not mention a single one.

(i) There is no bibliography.

(ii) He writes as if he is British or a crafty Muslim like Maulana Azad.

 

(iii) On page 66 we find, “Even as late as March 1947, Gandhi had insisted, ‘If Congress wishes to accept Partition, it will be over my dead body. So long as I live, I will never agree to Partition of India.’  - So what happened to this promise? Malgaonkar keeps quiet. That was the promise on which Congress got elected.

 

If Gandhi had any morality he would have told Nehru and Patel, “You got elected on the basis of the promise to Hindu voters that you will never accept partition. If you want to go back on your words you must resign and seek a mandate for partition, especially as you are going to accept partition without exchange of population.”

Gandhi did no such thing, agreed to betray the Hindus and had to pay for it.

 

Patel and Nehru had secretly decided to accept partition without exchange of population. So, by end of March 1947 all Provinces ruled by Congress, passed Public Security Measures Acts. The whole of British India under Congress rule became a Police state. Congress became more oppressive than the British. Malgaonkar does not want to know. All such Acts are available in British Library, London.

 

(iv) On 16 January 1948 Times of India reported on front page –

India’s gesture to Pakistan

Immediate Payment of Cash Balances

Bid to remove cause of suspicion

New Delhi January 15

 

The Government of India have decided to implement immediately the financial agreement with Pakistan in regard to the cash balance with a view to removing “the one cause of suspicion and friction” between Pakistan and India.

“This decision” says a “communiqué” issued by the Prime Minister’s Secretariat late tonight. “It is the Government’s contribution in the best of their ability to the non-violent and noble effort made by Gandhiji in accordance with the glorious traditions of this great country, for peace and goodwill.”

The Prime Minister of India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru in a separate statement said ; “We have come to this decision in the hope that this gesture, in accord with India’s high ideals and Gandhiji’s noble standards will convince the world of our earnest desire for peace and goodwill.

“We earnestly trust also that this will go a long way towards producing a situation which will induce Gandhiji’s to break his fast. That fast of course had nothing to do with this particular matter and we have thought of it because of our desire to help in every way in easing the present tension.

 

The Government of India communiqué reads –

“The Government of India have fully clarified their position in regard to the cash balances must be considered as a part of overall settlement of outstanding questions in issue between India and Pakistan.

 

The question is this – where is the financial agreement between India and Pakistan?

Malgaonkar does not want to know.

Partition meant division of assets and liabilities. 55 crores of rupees was the last payment of division of assets. The financial agreement also states that Pakistan must accept liability of 300 crores of rupees. But this was to be paid at a later date. Why? And this amount was never paid back by Pakistan. 

Even today, Indian budget shows this amount outstanding from Pakistan. Comptroller General says that he has no authority to write this sum off.- and that is without inflation and

interest over 60 years. Today that will amount to some 9,000 crores of rupees. Malgaonkar does not want to know.

 

(iv) It is surprising that he uses the words Life sentence (pages v, 22, 279, 351) instead of Transportation for life.

 

(v) Gandhi Jinnah talks – where are the details of their discussions? Why the secrecy?

Malgaonkar does not want to know.

 

(vi)There is no demand to open up Cabinet papers of those days as the British Government has done.

 

(vii) Under English law there could not be any photography in court – Indian law was based on English law. And yet this was flagrantly flouted. Malgaonkar does not want to know.

(viii) P L Inamdar was a follower of Gandhi since childhood. He was lawyer for Dr Parchure who was acquitted. As the case developed Inamdar became repugnant of Gandhism. Malgaonkar does not mention this.

 

(ix) Kapoor Commission reported was published in 1970. A copy could have been available from any major bookshop selling Government of India publications. There is a copy in British Library. Why Malgaonkar could not get a copy till 2008?

 

This not what we expect from a Colonel in Maratha Light Infantry.

 

 

4.5 Savarkar in Andaman jail.

Brutal treatment of political prisoners in Andaman Jail was first exposed in Bengalee, the newspaper of Moderate leader Surendranath Banerjee. Our friend Dileep Pednekar of Basingstoke obtained copies of relevant pages of the paper dated 27 April 1912.

(It is strange that on the front page we find news of Titanic disaster)

Shree Pednekar also found a copy of Maratha (of Lokamanya Tilak) of 28 July 1912 which published the news of suicide of Indubhushan Roy Chowdhari in Andaman jail.

These were sent to organizers of Savarkar web-site in Pune.

Note – what a pity that we are doing this research more than 100 years after the events!

But we must be thankful to the British for preserving copies of our newspapers. Copies of above documents will be sent by E Mail if you contact Godbole

 

4.6 Taj Mahal

(i) As yet we can’t find any one who would visit Taj Mahal with our Tourist Guide and give us more information and photographs.

Our friends from Australia, Canada, America and even Britain visit Taj Mahal without telling us of their intentions beforehand. We can’t understand why.

 

(ii) It is astonishing how the legend continues to grow. While clearing up the study room I came across New Civil Engineer of 19/26 August 1999. Usual Taj legend is repeated and in addition we are told by Georgina Whittaker that 1,000 elephants were also employed!