INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INTO TRUE HISTORY

 

Newsletter No 29 of 16 June 1996

 

1 News and current affairs

 

1.1 Taj Mahal and the Great British Conspiracy

* This book has now been published by Dr Bedekar

* Four friends have promised a total of Rs 30,000 for publication, Mr Godbole has contributed further Rs 11,000. If you too want to contribute towards the costs it will be welcome.

 

Viraj Sardesai of America informs us that the book is now available on INTERNET (World Wide Web) The code name is GHEN (Global Hindu Electronic Network)

 

1.3 Why Rewrite Indian History?

Copies of this booklet are available from Mr Godbole.

 

1.4 The Falsity of Indo-Saracenic Architecture

This work will be kept pending for some time.

 

1.5 Taj Mahal : Facts and Fantasies

No slide shows so far in 1996.

 

1.6 Around London Tour of places associated with Indian freedom

fighters

 

• Mrs Sharma, a freelance correspondent had enquired about this tour. Full details were given to her in November 95

 

• Visitors from America have to wait for 9 to 10 hours at Heathrow Airport when they are on the way to India. They can easily visit some of the places associated with our freedom fighters in London.

 

If you can help in furthering this cause please contact Mr Godbole.

 

• A six page leaflet is available from Mr Godbole for such visitors.

This will enable any tourists from America to visit on their own.

 

1.7 An encouraging response from the RSS

We reviewed RSS chief Golwalkar Guruji's book Bunch of thoughts in our newsletter 18 of October 1989. Copies were sent to various senior RSS officers. When Rajubhayya became the RSS chief in place of Deoras, one copy was also sent to him in April 1994. On 26 October 1995 H V Sheshadri wrote to Mr Godbole. He says," This is to acknowledge and sincerely thank you for your letter of 1st April 1994 and your detailed suggestions and comments vis a vis " Bunch of Thoughts ".................. We are presently going through your constructive suggestions in a dispassionate manner. It was a fortunate coincidence that your communication reached me just in time to stop the 'Bunch ' from going into print. Its composing had been completed and was awaiting the striking order.

 

I am really sorry for this inordinate delay in replying to your good self. I am extremely happy to know from Dr Tatvavadiji whom I met just last week how deeply you are involved in the sacred task of Hindu Renaissance in U K – a mission dearest and nearest to all our hearts."

 

 

1.8 How did a few thousand British rule India ?

Our children who are being brought up in foreign lands want to know about Shivaji. Same is true of non Maharastrians in India and abroad. A book on him in English will be a great help to them. Mr Godbole had requested some of his friends who originally came from Pune to get a few copies of Shivaji's biography in English by Setu Madharao Pagdi, whenever they visited Pune on holidays.. That is the only book of its kind. But four of Godbole's friends came back empty handed saying," That book is out of print." Out of print does not mean out of stock. Continental Prakashan of Pune did have about 100 copies of this book. Dr Bhide of Pune kindly acquired all these copies and posted them to Godbole. With such incompetence even today no wonder a few thousand British ruled over us.

 

1.9 Ambedkar's birthday.

On 23 April 1995 Friends of India Society organised Ambedkar birthday celebration in London. Rajubhayya the RSS chief was the chief guest.

 

The main speaker was a doctor from Stoke on Trent regarded as authority on Ambedkar. He also happened to be known to Mr Godbole. He said, " Ambedkar was a wise man. He proposed partition of India. Even today we have a problem with Muslims living in India. What would have happened if there was no partition. Was he a traitor because he proposed partition? "

 

"Ambedkar's father was sergeant in the Indian army. So he considered defence of India when proposing partition."

 

"As for his conversion to Buddhism, he did not want to cause damage to the Hindu society."

 

These utterances were bad enough. But Prof. Rajubhayya, in his speech said,

" Ambedkar knew that after all Gandhi and Nehru were going to accept partition of India, so he too towed the line. It is true that he did not want to hurt Hindus so he asked his followers to embrace Buddhism."

 

What a pathetic performance by the two speakers!. In a life or death situation

anything that will help the enemy is treachery. For that reason, yes Ambedkar was a traitor. In 1946 he wrote the book Pakistan or Partition of India as if there were Hindus and Muslims fighting with each other and then millions of untouchables somewhere up in heaven. It is mischievous, and biased against Hindus. Neither Ambedkar (in 1947 ) nor our doctor friend told us what happened to the millions of untouchables who lived in the territories which became Pakistan. (they too were brutally treated and hounded out)

 

Ambedkar lived for ten years after partition of India. All his calculations and prophesies were proved wrong. Did he ever admit as much? NO. Godbole's doctor friend did not tell us how partition led to better defence of India. Were the borders of India after partition easily defensible?

 

As for Ambedkar's conversion to Buddhism less said the better. Savarkar wrote two articles in Kesari a Marathi daily of Pune in October 1956. He says quite bluntly," At present many Hindus feel that Ambedkar had some sympathy for Hindus so he adopted Buddhism. Future generations are also likely to be misguided into thinking the same way. Therefore it is important to set the record straight. Ambedkar wanted to do maximum damage to the Hindus but he did not get a chance. He has not done any favours to us by not embracing Christianity or Islam. He has shown his sick mentality by his anti-Hindu propaganda for last three years, criticising Hindu people and Hindu religion in most foul language. But he dare not criticise Islam and Christianity for the same failings - because he is a coward." Godbole's doctor friend being young may not have known this past, but Rajubhayya should have known better.

 

Ambedkar's idea of partition depended upon exchange of population. But he must have known what kind of men Gandhi and Nehru were. Partition simply implied that Hindus would be driven out of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and West Pakistan. But Gandhi and Nehru would prevent Muslims being sent to Pakistan from India, in equal numbers. And that is precisely what happened.

 

One did not need to be a visionary to predict this outcome. Gandhi approved of the Rajaji plan on 30 July 1944. It meant whole of Punjab and whole of Bengal going to Pakistan. To propose partition under such circumstances was a treachery. Moreover Ambedkar did not propose that as the two wings of Pakistan were thousand miles apart, they should be separate states. Oh no, anything that would dent the ego of the Muslims and expose their disunity and infighting would not do for Ambedkar. After all there was no love lost between Bengalis and rest of Pakistanis.

 

Ambedkar dreamed of Muslim-Untouchable unity. Congress party ministries resigned from various provinces in October 1940, Muslim League declared 22 December, a day of liberation. Ambedkar joined in and embraced Jinnah -

literally and in open! ( see article by R D Gayakyad in the Marathi bi-monthly Amrapali of 1-16 April 1986.) Yes Ambedkar embraced Jinnah in who called Ambedkar a Kafir.

 

Ambedkar's hatred of Hindu religion has now culminated in Ambedkar

Buddhism.

 

1.10 We are treated badly by others, but do we deserve better?

1.10.1 In May 1995 Mr Godbole conducted his Around London tour of places associated with Indian freedom fighters. This tour was arranged for friends from Leeds. He was told by Mr Dhabhi, a RSS worker that some friends could not come as it happened to be a Fathers' day and they wanted to spend time with their sons and daughters on that occasion.

Even the British do no celebrate Fathers' day. What an excuse for not attending our tour! Why did they not say that they considered it more important to spend time with their children than visit the places associated with Indian freedom fighters ?

 

1.10.2 In August 1994 Mr Godbole attended a party to celebrate the 70th birthday of a mother of one of his friends. At the end of the function her son proposed to observe five minutes silence for world peace and in memory of victims of wars in Bosnia, Ruanda Burundi. But he said not a single word about the plight of Hindus in Kashmir or Bangladesh.

 

Why should other treat us with respect?

 

2 Historical findings

2.1 Top Kapi Museum in Turkey : Mr Kantola's photographs have been received. More about them in the next newsletter.

 

 

3. How history gets twisted/ falsified even today

Dhananjay Keer wrote Veer Savarkar's biography in 1966. He says that -

Savarkar was mean. He paid his secretary and his bodyguard very poorly. He gave no money to his friends even in great need.

 

This is not true. Other historians say that Savarkar did lend money to others on what used to be called Promissory Notes. The words are corrupted to Parameshwari Notes meaning money given by god. Many such people refused to pay the loans back saying," Oh money given by Savarkar is money given by Parameshwar ( god ) how can it be returned back ? " In the end Savarkar simply burnt such notes.

 

Mr Keer also says that Savarkar would not see anyone without an appointment, but gives no dates. He implies that due prison conditions Savarkar did not like company of people. This is gross perversion of facts. In jail in Andaman islands Savarkar made every effort to contact other inmates. How could he have carried out so much work in prison if he was a loner. In his internment in Ratnagiri (1924 -37 ) Savarkar carried out social reforms. As a result people of Ratnagiri stopped practising untouchability. Was this possible if Savarkar did not meet others? .

 

Savarkar did meet Subhashchandra Bose without previous appointment in June 1940. The two also met secretly when Bose was President of the Congress Party. In his public speech of 30 April 1938 Savarkar said," some 30 to 40 congressmen who felt it an insult that Gandhi should negotiate with Jinnah came to my house often. They said that I should intervene and put a stop to such talks." This was not possible if Savarkar did not want to meet people.

 

Keer states that Bhai Paramanand was also denied a meeting, without prior appointment. But this is false. In 1937 Savarkar was preparing a speech as President of Hindu Maha Sabha for its annual session at Karnavati (Ahmedabad) Bhai Paramanand realised its importance and met Savarkar's elder brother Babarao instead.

 

One can understand an author pointing out failings of a hero, but he /she must check facts and not twist the history.

 

 

4 Behaviour of Christians and Muslims today

4.1 On 27 September 1995, Robert Fisk reported from Beirut for Independent

Plight of Palestinians : As Libya expels thousands, even those who thought they had found a home are locked out

Colonel Mummar Gaddafi yesterday ordered 1,500 Palestinians to leave Libya and seemed to set to evict scores of thousands more foreign workers, including 200,000 from Sudan.

 

Despite Libyan promises to the Arab League to end the expulsions of foreigners, 30 Palestinians were stranded in the desert at Salloum on the Libyan-Egyptian border last night and hundreds more were being rounded up in Tripoli and placed on buses.

 

Panois Moumtizis, head of foreign relations for the UN High Commissioner for Refuges, warned of an impending humanitarian crisis. The expelled Palestinians were living in " appalling conditions ..... It's like a rubbish dump," he said.

 

Egypt has refused to accept expelled Palestinians except those in transit with official papers to Jordan, or to Gaza and the West Bank. Other Arab countries also appear reluctant to take them.

 

The PLO leader, Yaser Arafat appealed to Libya to reprieve the refugees, many of whom are lone-term residents with responsible jobs in the Libyan oil industry.

" I appeal to my brother, the President Muammar, to make the right decision concerning his Palestinian brothers and allow them to return to their places of residence in Libya," he said.

 

It is now almost a month since Colonel Gaddafi, the oddest and least predictable of Arab leaders, announced that he was ordering up to 25,000 Palestinians out of Libya in protest at the PLO- Israeli peace agreement. Save for Colonel Gaddafi himself and his puppet press and television service, no one seems to believe that his stated reasons for the expulsions are real.

 

Recent rioting between the police and Islamists in Benghanzi, along with difficulties in paying foreign workers in Libya - which remains under UN sanctions for its alleged part in the Lockerbie bombing - are believed to lie behind the evictions.

 

On the other hand Iraqi sources have indicated that Libya has sent a guest-worker recruiting team to Baghdad to hire more Iraqis to join 65,000 of their fellow-countrymen who are working as teachers and doctors in Libya.

 

A Libyan border official said Colonel Gaddafi had ordered all Palestinians to pack  their bags after Israel and the PLO reached a new deal on Sunday in Egypt to extend self-rule across the West Bank." On Sunday, authorities sent letters to all the Palestinians in Libya ordering one group to leave the country within 24 hours and the remainder within 48 hours," the official said.

 

The PLO-Israeli accords offer little hope for the abruptly displaced Palestinians, which may, in part, be the point that the Libyan leader is trying to make. Under the Middle East peace process their fate is not due to be discussed until May 1996. Most expelled Palestinians have gone to the Gaza Strip or Jordan, Mr Mountzis said. But many are still stuck at borders lacking the right entry papers. Israel is refusing entry to those who cannot prove they have permanent residence in the Gaza Strip. Jordan has et up a camp at its southern port of Aqaba as a " sorting " station.

 

Many thousands of Sudanese illegal immigrants are also to be deported from Libya. About 15,000 Sudanese are stuck at the Libyan border town of Kufra waiting for transport home.

 

Mr Mountzis visited the Libyan-Egyptian border on Monday to distribute food and blankets. He said he saw 12 large tents set up on the Libyan side of the border." Libya wants to make a camp for them near the border and get them out of the country," he said.

 

He described conditions on the border as hostile. Swarms of flies and mosquitoes were increasing the risk of illness, and one woman was taken to hospital after being stung by a scorpion." It's a rubbish dump there. There are scared to sleep at night because of the scorpions; children have diarrhoea and women have to wait till darkness to relieve themselves because they are exposed."

 

So much for the Islamic brotherhood of man! And yet the Palestinians will

never say that they are Palestinians and not Muslims. But our Dalit brothers

have been saying that they are not Hindus.

 

 

4.2 Daily Telegraph of 15 December 1995 reported that Bosnia Peace accord was signed by the warring factions. But according to the deal Bosnian Serbs will have to live under Muslin control in Sarajaveo. And what did they do? They evacuated the city and even dug up graves of their dead and took them away They do not trust that Muslims will respect even Serbian dead!

 

4.3 On 3 April 1996 BBC 2 showed a programme entitled Last Among Equals. Evening Standard states," Mark Tully, the veteran (and venerated) broadcaster, reporting on Indian Dalit Christians. Having converted from Hindusim, these former untouchables have found that Christian churches operate their own caste systems too. In a village near Madras, upper and lower caste Christians do not share places of worship or burial grounds."

( Now you know why Ambedkar did not embrace Islam or Christianity )

 

 

5. Victorian Britain

In November/ December 1994 BBC2 televised a series on Thursdays called

FORBIDDEN BRITAIN.- OUR SECRET PAST 1900 TO 1960

 

It shatters the myth of Britain being a land of peace, law and order, and happy and contented families and people. It dealt with the following aspects :-

 

Juvenile crime

Youth crime was a part of daily life. One former thief said that he never broke into a working class home because they had nothing to steal. They mostly stole food items. Easy targets were the corner shops who displayed food on pavement. Parents knew about theft, but welcomed food however obtained. The police knew about these petty thefts, but turned a blind eye. As long as property was protected their job was done. Gang warfares were rampant.

 

Middle class boys got away with crime because of their class.

 

Sex outside marriage and under age sex would land one in a juvenile court.

Eloping was a crime.

 

Advent of the Car led to more crime. There was more opportunity for crime. If you steal a new car police would nod at you, but if you stole an old car they will become suspicious.

 

At some stage Approved schools were established instead of prisons. Shoplifting would land youngsters in such schools. One in five ran away, some were caught some managed to survive by stealing food and money for years.

Bostral schools was another alternative boys from the age of 16 to 23 were sent there. The authorities were law onto themselves and would make life hell. There was no appeal, no fear of an outside inspection. They could get away with murder. Illicit beatings were common place.

War provided a way out for boys in bostrals. Those who had been in such schools could join the army. Desertion among soldiers was rampant. 20,000

deserted each year.

 

Second World War provided opportunities for youth crime. With conscription's of fathers youngsters were left on their own. Blitz and blackouts provided excellent opportunities for thefts. This fact was suppressed for the sake of morale. One former thief said," we stole ration books. It did not hurt the people from whom we stole. They simply got emergency books."

 

Extra marital affairs

We dealt with partly in previous newsletters. In addition we were told :-

War time marriages were a disaster. Couples rushed into marriages for infatuation. Separation created pressures on women. Broken marriages were kept a secret for morale on the war front. Frustrations led to the tendency for living for today which led to affairs and unwanted pregnancies. Most of the time married women were left dry when they were in a mess. Once the women were pregnant the men did not want to know. Soldiers tried to get their wives pregnant.

 

After the war men came home. They had affairs but that was o.k. Women were expected to be faithful. Divorce laws were weighed heavily against women

 

Racism and civil unrest.

Rioting in the streets was quite common. Publicity was censored by the government. Police beatings went unrecorded. At the end of World War I Britain was divided by class religion and race. Black soldiers were needed in the army and navy during the war. But afterwards they were not welcome in Britain. Police turned a blind eye to violence against blacks. Eventually 2,000 were repatriated to West Indies.

 

In 1926 there were several miner's strikes. Police protected the strike breakers.

 

Fighting in Ireland spread to Catholics and Protestants in mainland Britain, especially Liverpool and Glasgow. Orangemen marches created hatred for the Catholics. School children were given a day off to join in the marches. Religious rivalry spread to football grounds. In Glasgow Rangers and Celtic football clubs were organised on religious divide. There were riots on football ground.

 

There was lack of crowd control which resulted in a tragedy in 1946 when 33 spectators were crushed to death when barriers broke down during a football match.

 

During inter war years there were several marches of the unemployed. Their

only strength was their numbers.

 

In 1932 there was a hunger march in London. Photography and reporting was banned by the government. Feature films dealing with such issues were censored.

 

There were confrontations between Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts and the Communists, not only in London but elsewhere. Mosley had powerful friends. Police were partial to his supporters. On 4 October 1936 Mosley planned a provocative march through the East End of London, then populated largely by Jews. Police beat even the women protesters. After stiff resistance by the Jews the march ended in a fiasco. Uninformed marches were banned afterwards

 

Racism raised its ugly head again in 1954 and 1958. Mosley used teddy boys for his campaign of keeping Britain white.

 

Homelessness

Very little information is available on this aspect. Vagrant was the term used to describe homeless. Officially homeless children did not exist, but their problem was not solved since the Victorian days.

 

Homeless people survived on raw leaves, cherries, dandelions, flowers and carrots. Pesticides were not in use then. So it was quite safe to eat such vegetation. Graveyards were used by the homeless at nights.

 

The welfare of homeless children was left to charitable societies like National Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children ( NSPCC )

 

Some had dreams of making fortune in the British Empire. They got on ships with high hopes, only to be returned to land by the captains.

 

Irish labourers had extremely hard time during inter war years. They faced hostility and discrimination. If lucky they could find seasonal work on farms. They slept on beds of straw. They had no cooking and washing facilities. They had to walk miles to find work.

 

Last refuge of the homeless was the Salvation Army hostels. It was an unnerving experience for any one.

Second World War added to the problem of the homeless. Some 1/2 million people were now homeless. Though there were disused Army camps which could be used, local councils did not want to house the homeless.

 

In the post war period teenage runway girls were sent to mental hospitals.

 

Sexual abuse

In 1908 incest was recognised as a crime due to pressure from NSPCC. True extent of sexual abuse is not known. Working class cases of abuse are recorded by NSPCC and the police. Girls were mostly abused by their fathers, sometimes by their brothers. One reason was that because of lack of accommodation families slept together.

 

The effects of such abuse haunts the women even after 60 / 70 years. They faced loneliness, were withdrawn, developed self destruction tendencies. Adults paid no attention to children's' complaints. As a result they were frightened into silence. They knew no one they could trust. When they did complain there was no evidence to prove sexual abuse had taken place. Worst still, even the institutions for such children were not immune from sexual abuse. There was no check on the staff running such institutions.

 

By the 1950s family stability had returned - at least on the face. In middle class homes abuse went unnoticed.

 

Unemployment

In the 1930s various schemes were introduced to get people back to work. Retraining centres did not have enough money allocated for their effective use. They were a farce.

 

Prospectus for women were even bleaker. They were trained for domestic service. When they found jobs as domestic servants they were general dogs bodies working from 6.30 a.m. to 8 p.m.

 

Emigration was not easy. In 1928, 10,000 emigrants were sent back by Canadian government as there was no demand for labour in that country. The unemployed were saddled with a debt of £ 20 for sea passage to and from Canada ( a large sum in those days )

 

Churches tried to rekindle religious faith by regular prayers. But there was utter disillusionment at such attempts.

National Unemployed Workers' Union led marches demonstrations and meetings. They organised unannounced sit down at important places like the Oxford Circus.

 

Some hard-line politicians decided that the unemployed were getting work shy. So they set up Instruction Centres run by Army Officers. In fact they were labour camps. Conditions were Spartan, discipline harsh. Manual labour caused hands to blister. But workers had no choice. They got 15 shillings a week dole for six months, after which they were sent to labour camps. If they refused to work they were sent back and got no dole. Such pitiable conditions persisted for nearly ten years. It was only the World War II that brought full employment to Britain

 

A book based on the series is published by the BBC

 

 

6. Forgive and forget

6.1 Evening Standard reported on 5 June 1996," Welsh hand out a snub to

Churchill archive"

The first act attempts to show the public some of the Churchill Papers,

controversially bought for the nation with £132.25 million of Lottery money a

year ago, have already net with indifference in one quarter.

The Welsh have said they are not interested in the small but fascinating exhibition derived from the collection which opens tomorrow at the Public Records Office in Chancery Lane.

" We are very disappointed," said Piers Brendon, curator of the Churchill Archives in Cambridge, where the papers are held and can already be seen by appointment." We approached the National Library of Wales in Aberystwyth and they did not want to know, although they said they would be interested in an exhibition about Churchill and Lloyd George."

No reasons for refusal were given but may be still embedded in Welsh memories is Churchill's decision as Home Secretary in 1911 to break the Welsh miners' strike at Tonypandy.

 

Dear oh dear. The Welsh are still bitter about events of 80 years ago!. Look at us Hindus. We have no memory whatsoever. If the collection was displayed in India, there will be huge crowds.

 

6.2 John Hiscock reported from Los Angeles for Daily Telegraph on 9 April 1996:-OLD CONFLICTS REKINDLED OVER CAMP FOR JAPANESE.

Plans to build a museum on the site of a California camp where 10,000 Japanese-Americans were interned during the Second World War has infuriated historians and ex-servicemen's groups.

Fifty years after it closed, the former Manzanar internment camp has become such a divisive issue that angry citizens have said that they will destroy any memorial or museum that is built there.

Officials of the National Parks Service, which is developing the museum, have been threatened and jeered on site visits.

Manzanar was built near the small town of Independence in 1942 when United States military authorities rounded up 110,000 people of Japanese descent - more than two-thirds of them American citizens - who were living on America's west coast, and shipped them to 10 internment camps in the Western states.

 

US authorities acknowledge that about 10,000 went to Manzanar, forced to leave homes, jobs and businesses to be confined behind barbed wire in wooden barracks.

 

The injustice of the episode was cited by Congress when it named Manzanar

an historic site.

But many people dispute the accepted history of the camp and are particularly enraged by an historical marker at the entrance which refers to Manzanar as a concentration camp.

 

According to the revisionist account, rather than the eight towers with machine-guns that Park Service historians say ringed the camp, there were only one or two fire watchtowers.

" To say these people were interned there is an incredible lie" said Lillian Baker an historian and author of four books on the subject

" They volunteered to be re-located there because they had nowhere else to go. At Manzanar they had their own post office, library, bank, hospital and newspaper. They could take the bus into town and do whatever they wanted."

 

But Ross Hopkins, the National Parks Service's superintendent of Manzanar, said," There is a cadre of super-patriotic individuals whose agenda seems to be to belittle and minimise the experience of Japanese Americans at Manzanar. Somehow they feel it reflects badly on America."

 

Just note how history gets twisted even today. Survivors of these camps are still alive. Why not ask them what happened ? Why speculate ?

 

 

7. Why we cannot tell the truth

Occupational safety & health news of December 1995 reports four cases of workers too scared to speak the truth. The editor heard following stories when his train was delayed for 50 minutes.

 

* A man on his way to a hospital appointment because of chronic lung problems. According to his doctors, these had probably been caused by his 25 years in construction. The blocks he was told to lift above chest height on his current job

(no handling aids) were too heavy for him and he knew nothing of the manual handling regs. Even after my explanation he said he wouldn't be mentioning them to his boss. He'd definitely get the sack if he did that. Anyway, they'd been very good when he'd had a fall off some scaffolding (no hard hat) a few years previously and had taken him back on after his sick leave.

 

* A 23 year old who worked in an amusement arcade. Every week she did five, eight-hour shifts, four of which ended at 10 p.m. when she locked the day's takings in the safe. She was always frightened because the arcade attracted a lot of youths and she and her (female) colleagues wouldn't stand much of a chance if the clients cut rough. Furthermore, if the alarm wouldn't set (a frequent occurrence) she had to stay, by herself, waiting for the engineer. She's waited upto 12.30 a.m. before now. She did not get paid after 10 p.m. Complain? Ask about the company's policy on lone working? She'd lose her job.

 

* The wife scared witless about her 50 year old husband who'd had a heart by-pass op two years ago. He'd worked all his life for the same car company. There were no light duty jobs available on his return to work so he was put straight back on the track. And at present they were sending increased numbers of car bodies through. He came home, ashen-faced with exhaustion, every night and went straight to bed. The company's occupational health department said," there's nothing we can do." and anyway, heart by-passes are commonplace these days. No, he couldn't get out; her job as a keyboard operator was only part-time and they couldn't afford it. And besides her firm was very good about not pushing her too hard when she got " these awful pains in her arms and shoulders." No, she never heard of Display Screen Equipment (DSE) regs.

 

* A woman with appalling varicose veins who was the manageress of a tobacco kiosk. There was nowhere to sit down in the booth so she stood all day. Other staff would not turn up and when this happened she'd have to do their shift herself. She did not get paid for this - she got time off in lieu .. except she never got the time off. She needed an op for her veins but she did not think they'd keep her job open.

 

The editor adds :- None of this was recounted for my benefit; they did not know what I did for a living (though I got some funny looks as I talked about health and safety law) For them, these were the facts of working life. I wondered not for the first time, what on earth is the point of all our carefully drafted legislation when it has absolutely no impact on the lives of so many of our fellow citizens? And, I thought, fat chance that the proposed new regs on employee consultation will make the slightest bit of difference either.

 

We are all scared for our jobs. So are Indian historians who refuse to face truth about Taj Mahal.

 

 

8 Obituary

8.1 We are sad to announce the death of Jeevan Kulkarni, a research scholar from Mumbai (Bombay). He died of cancer on 19 November 1995. It is sad that his work did not get the recognition it deserved. His book Historical Truths & Untruths Exposed was published by Dr Bedekar of Thane, India. It shows Kulkarni's calibre

 

8.2 Subrahmanyan Chandrashekharthe Indian Noble prize winner died in

August 1995.

He won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1983, half a century after he had confounded members of the Royal Astronomical Society with his audacious lecture on white dwarf stars. He was still a student at Cambridge when he presented his findings in 1935.

 

His uncle C V Raman received the Nobel Prize for physics in 1930 for his study of the scattering of light rays.

 

Having obtained a Physics degree from Presidency College, University of Madras Chandrashakhar won a scholarship to Trinity College, Cambridge. In 1931 he discussed ' the black hole ' though he did not use the term. In 1936 he moved to the University of Chicago and its Yerkes Observatory at Williams Bay, Wisconsin. He remained there for the next 50 years.

 

During the Second World War, Chandrashakhar worked on the study of ballistics in Maryland, having refused an invitation to join other scientists at Los Angeles, on the Development of the atomic bomb. ...... Two of his students, Tsung Dao Lee and Chen Ning Yang shared the Nobel Prize for Physics, in 1957.  Chandrashakhar had to wait until 1983 for his, and by this time he had been working on the mathematical theory of black holes. He considered this work to be the most important he had done.

 

Subrahmanyan Chandrashakhar is survived by his wife Lalitha, also a physicist.. There are no children. .

 

8.3 Our friend Kumar Sundaram died of heart attack in May in Australia. He did a lot of research on Hindu civilisation all over the world.

 

 

9. Acknowledgement

We are grateful to the following for their help :-

• For taking copies of our newsletters to India and posting these there

Arvind Kulkarni of Preston Road, Wembley, England. Mr Rajesh Tawari of Amaravati, India, Smita Pethe of Thane , India

• For making copies of our newsletters and distributing them to friends:-

An anonymous friend from Pune, India, Dina Nath Behl of London, Dr

Godbole of Rochdale, Raj Vora of Dombivali, India, Viraj Sardesai of USA.

Mrs Sharma, a correspondent from India

• For publicising our Around London Tour

Mrs Bhanap, President of Maharashtra Mandal, London.

• For donating for our cause :-

Mrs Kelkar of Richmond upon Thames (Rs 100)

Mr Raste of Croydon (Rs 200)

Mr Thakur of Seven Oaks (Rs 100)

An anonymous friend from Pune ( Rs 7,000 )

• For contributing towards the publication of Mr Godbole's book

Taj Mahal and the Great British Conspiracy -

Mr Mohanlal Gupta of Canada, Raj Vora of Dombivali, near Thane, India, an anonymous friend from Pune, India and Devendra Kanthola of Glasgow. They all contributed Rs 5,000 each.

 

Dr More of Rahuri, Maharashtra has offered Rs 3,000 for the same

 

 

10. Publicity and Appreciation

We received a letter from Dr Gogate of Amaravati, India. He is very pleased with Mr Godbole's booklet Why Rewrite Indian History?.

 

 

Please help by :-

 

* acknowledging the receipt of this newsletter to the following address

 

Mr V S Godbole

14 Turnberry Walk

Bedford

MK41,8AZ

 UK

 

* sending money to Mr Godbole (in pound sterling or Indian rupees )

* making 5 copies of this newsletter and sending them to your friends.

* circulating this newsletter among your friends.

* trying to get parts of this newsletter published in various newspapers, magazines and periodicals

* arranging slide shows by Godbole at various social functions.