INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INTO TRUE HISTORY

Newsletter No 33 of 16 June 1998

 

1 News and current affairs

1.1 Dr Acharya, our friend and resident priest of Arya Samaj of West Ealing, London has left England  to work in Canada. His address is

Dr Tanaji Acharya                 ( Tel No. 001-905 -475-5778 )

4345 - 14th Avenue

Markham

Ontario

Canada L3R, 0J2

 

1.2 The Aryan Problem

This book contains papers read at a seminar held in Bangalore, South India in July 1991. The papers expose the falsity of the concept of Aryan race and the Indo-European language they were supposed to have spoken.

 

Prof. Bharadwaj, President of Arya Samaj, West Ealing, London. was anxious to send copies of this book to various scholars. Mr Godbole, accordingly sent copies to the following :-

 

School of Oriental and African Studies, London

India Office Library, London

North London University.

University of Cambridge

University of Oxford

University of Durham

University of Hull

 

1.3 Rationalism of Veer Savarkar

* This work of Mr Godbole (in Marathi) is now with the printers. It is expected that typing will be complete by August and the book printed in November 1998

 

* Mr Godbole is translating the book into English. The preface has been translated and sent by Internet to friends & well wishers.

 

1.4 Around London Tour of places associated with Indian freedom fighters

* Mr Godbole met Mrs Shruti Sadolikar, a classical singer from India, in Holland, towards the end of May. She said that she was interested in attending such a tour with her group on her next visit to England. 

 

* A Gujarathi leaflet on the tour is being produced.

 

1.5 British Justice.

1.5.1  The Steven Lawrence case

Stephen Lawrence, a 18 year old West Indian school boy was stabbed to death as he waited for a bus in Eltham, South East London, in April 1993. The handling of the case by the Police has been disgraceful beyond belief. So disgusted was even the right wing paper Daily Mail that in 1997 in an unprecedented move it published photographs of the five white murderers - Gary Dobson, Neil Acourt, Jamie Acourt, Luke Knight and David Norris. It openly challenged them to take the paper to court. The lawyers of the five did not take the challenge.

 

How many more such cases go unnoticed ?

 

A public enquiry into police handling of the murder investigation was started in 1998. The chairman is Sir William Macpherson. The salient features are :-

 

* Every day brings new revelations of inept detective work, a lack of urgency and resources, missed opportunities. The case shows an astonishingly casual and incompetent attitude on the part of certain police officers.

 

* At first the police complained about a wall of silence in the community. But some of the crucial information reached them within hours and days of the murder. They treated it with " considerable indifference " The full information came from an informant who was not seen by police again for four days

 

* Police were given the names of five suspects within hours of killing - but did not arrest them for two weeks.

 

* Vital evidence was lost due to this inexcusable delay in arresting suspects - a delay outrageously justified by former Deputy Assistant Commissioner David Osland, who said even arresting them after two weeks was 'premature'

 

* The senior investing officer, retired Detective Superintendent Brian Weeden admitted not making an arrest earlier because he was ignorant of the criminal law on arrests, believing he had to have evidence rather than reasonable suspicion.

 

* And when the five were eventually held and their homes searched police forgot to look under floorboards, despite being told knives were probably hidden there.

 

* An internal enquiry was carried out by Deputy Chief Superintendent Roderick Barker. He gave an explanation. First he had discussed what approach to take with Commander Hugh Blenkin, in charge of operational matters in 1993. Blenkin, he said, had told him that the review should be carried out sensitively and should not criticise any officers, particularly Detective Superintendent Brian Weeden, who was then the senior investing officer.

 

* Eventually in June 1998 Assistant Commissioner Ian Johnson of the Metropolitan Police made a dramatic and unprecedented public apology to the Lawrence family. He said that in retrospect the police could have done better in the investigation.

 

In February 1997 he said ' I believe right from the start we did everything we could ' Today with the backing of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Paul Condon - he accepted unreservedly that that was not the case. The internal police review of the investigation, which had suggested nothing had gone wrong, had been " totally discredited " I deeply regret that we have not put away the killers.

 

* The Police Federation never expressed any sorry to the Lawrence family. But their chairman Mike Bennett complained that questioning of his members at the enquiry has been too tough and 'humiliating'

 

So much for the British Rule of Law in 1998!!

 

 

1.5.2 Child murderers

On 14 November 1997 Paul Cheston reported for the Evening Standard

Baby death couple admit tape recorded cruelty.

 

A mother and her partner who escaped prosecution for killing a baby because it cannot be proved whether one or both was responsible for the child’s death, today changed their plea and admitted cruelty and neglect. John Sherrington, 33 and Lavinia Adams, 31 will be sentenced on these charges by Judge Richard Hawkins at the Old Bailey next month. The move came a day after a tape of 18 month old Sarah’s screams were played to the jury. The tape was recorded as Sherrington held the baby in a headlock between his legs. Sarah died of brain injuries and heavy bruising in November last year, two days after being admitted to St Helier Hospital, Carshalton.

 

Both defendants have now admitted two counts of failing to seek or provide treatment for Sarah’s injuries. Martial arts expert Sherrington also admitted squeezing Sarah between his legs and Adams had pleaded guilty to biting the baby. The judge ordered that three other charges of child cruelty against Sherrington would lie on the file. Orlando Pownall, prosecuting told the court

” There is no doubt one or other of the defendants caused the fatal injuries. In the absence of evidence showing whoever caused these injuries and if the other was offering wilful encouragement as part of shared intention to harm the child, it would be wrong to charge either or both with homicide.” The jury has been told that Sherrington and Adams had independently and jointly attacked Sarah during the eight weeks before her death. Police found the tape when they searched the defendant’s Sutton home after their arrest.

 

[ But suppose they had not found the tape, or the tape did not exist, the two murderers would have gone free!, because that is British Justice !! True, the baby died, she died of horrible attacks, and true there could not be anyone else causing the death, but it could not be proved that one or both were responsible - what a system of justice. YES there have been many such cases where both parents have gone scot free ]

 

 

 

2. Truth is unpalatable

Babies, lies and videotape : These terrible films of parental abuse force us to face the unthinkable.

 

Libby Purves wrote for the Times on 28 October 1997 :- It doesn’t bear thinking of does it ? The children’s ward is darkened, quiet and warm, its peace is broken by the distant squeak of a nurse’s shoe. The small child lies in a cubicle, breathing quietly. At the bedside sits the timeless figure of  mother watching at her infant’s sickbed. She reaches out to the baby and roughly flicks or slaps it awake. Then suffocates it. Or breaks its arms, or forces disinfectant into its mouth.

 

But everything has been seen by hidden observers. Lights snap on, a nurse comes in, the damage is prevented and the harrowing process of law begins to roll : towards care orders, prosecutions, psychiatry. That baby will not grow up with its own mother now, but at least it will grow up.

 

These things have happened not once but more than 30 times in the past decade. The video cameras were installed in two hospitals. Under cover of clinical work, Professor David Southall then conducted covert observation of parents whose babies had suffered inexplicable illness. He got this answers. Four of the parents - not all, but mostly mothers have since confessed that a total of eight previous deaths in  their family were not the medically mysterious “ sudden infant death syndrome ” but straightforward suffocation. Another death sibling of the video babies was found to have been poisoned.

 

These parents, says Professor Southall, were plausible and pleasant : what he saw on the video cameras was a rapid transition to brutality which would otherwise be unbelievable. Such things are what scientists call “ counter -initiative “ nobody wants to accept that smiling, well presented parents do the things recorded on Professor Southall’s log. “ Hitting child on mouth ... toothbrush rammed down throat, ... Mother disconnected oxygen ... swore at him .... slapped him ... flicked eyelids open ... pushed face into pillow. “ Unbelievable: but it has to be confronted. ....

 

Think of the far greater privacy of a home. Think of the fact that most of the babies in the Southall studies had no visible marks of abuse on them, so cunning were their tormentors. Reflect that a baby doesn’t necessarily die : the paper also remarks that a significant proportion of cerebral palsy and learning difficulties remains unexplained, but could be due to episodes of suffocation. As I said, it does not bear thinking of. In Britain we prefer not to. Professor Southall has published his findings in the American journal Paediatrics, which deplores the criticism he has met. What Dr Southall wants .. is a change in the whole philosophy of child protection. .... His case is that there are some parents too dangerous to trust. ..... they were concerned and loving while a doctor or nurse was in sight : only in the dim, lonely room under the cameras did the nightmare begin.

 

Pontificate all you like about civil rights, but without video such people would be uncatchable..... What he will get is hornet’s nest about his ears. .... But the videos and convictions and confessions are there. Infanticide happens. Note another uncomfortable piece of history involving the American journal : the case of Waneta Hoyt. This woman provided evidence for a landmark 1972 study suggesting that cot death runs in families : a whole industry flourished, building devices to test for it and alarms to prevent it.  Twenty years later Hoyt admitted that she killed five of her children. These things are horrible but they are true; we do not have the right to indulge our sentimentality by romanticising motherhood and blinding ourselves to the things that go sour in women, as well as men.

 

OUR COMMENTS :- Many people may find the truth about Taj Mahal unpalatable But the fact remains that it is a Hindu Temple Palace.

 

 

3. History today

 

3.1 Human Rights in Western Europe ?

3.1.1 Sweden ' lobotomised young children '

On 6 April 1998 Jim Heintz in Stockholm reported for the Guardian. He said :

 

Children as young as seven years old were lobotomised in Sweden and many people were subjected to the controversial surgery without relatives' permission, accordingly to a Swedish television documentary. About 4,500 people - twice as many as previously reported - were lobotomised from 1944 to 1963, the programme, to be broadcast on state television today, reports. .

 

The report is the latest to show a dark side to Sweden's widely admired medical and social services network. Last year it was reported that 60,000 people were forcibly sterilised between 1935 and 1976.

 

In a lobotomy the patient's frontal lobes are severed from the rest of the brain to try to relieve mental disorders. The procedure, widely used in many countries in the past, erases much of the patient's emotional life..

 

Martha Stormbladh, whose husband was lobotomised in 1963, said the operation left him seriously impaired. 'They have taken everything from him, emotional life, sexuality,. And they have taken him from me and the children ..... Who could believe that our lives would be like this - in Sweden ? ' she is reported as saying.

 

Mr Strombaldh was lobotomised because he suffered from schizophrenia, but the operation was also performed on 500 people who were not psychiatric patients, including some developmentally impaired children, according to the programme. Among them was a seven year-old boy, diagnosed as hyperactive, who died during the operation. The programme also says some patients were operated on without their relatives' permission, in violation of the law.

 

According to the Swedish news agency T T, the documentary is based on examination of records from the surgical departments of mental hospitals.

The Socialstyrelsen, Sweden's national welfare board, had said about 2,000 people had been lobotomised in Sweden. The opposition MP Dan Ericson, who has been pushing for compensation for those who underwent lobotomies is quoted as saying the figure of 4,500 is plausible.

" It's incomprehensible that there has been so little sympathy in parliament for this. But it's probably because this is a weak group that has difficulty speaking out." - AP

 

 

3.1.2 France 15,000 were forcibly sterilised.

 

On 11 September 1997 Susannah Herbert reported from Paris for the Daily Telegraph. She says,

 

“ About  15,000 mentally handicapped women aged under 45 have been sterilised without their knowledge or permission while in the care of French institutions, it emerged yesterday. The women, who include lightly afflicted individuals with learning difficulties, below average IQs or social adjustment problems, were sterilised at the request of their parents or on the initiative of supervising institutions. According to the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, Down’s Syndrome sufferers have also been systematically sterilised.  Many of the victims were told at the time of the operation that they were being treated for appendicitis or the like and are still unaware they can never have children.

 

One woman, Virginie, 42, was sterilised in her twenties, despite having only a very light mental handicap. ‘ I wanted to have a baby but they told me that, because of a hip operation I couldn’t have one - it would be paralysed’ she told Charlie Hebdo.: This was a pretext. They cut my tubes without warning, telling me that they had to operate again on my hip. My mother told me when I woke up. I started to cry. I didn’t dare to tell the man I was going out with. I was frightened he’d leave me, he adored children. Now I have a partner and when we see parents with their children t makes us feel truly terrible.“

 

The sheer number of women involved is surprising as France has long banned all sterilisations except in cases where the operation is justifiable on strong medical grounds. By contrast, in Sweden, the United States and Canada, where scandals of forced sterilisations have come to light, the operations have been carried out in accordance with government policy or law.” Although, national figures are unknown, Nicole Diedrich, an academic with France’s Institute for Health and Medical Research ( Inserm), said yesterday that 30 per cent of the mentally handicapped women in the Gironde department had been sterilised. Working out from this data, it’s probable that France had thousands of victims - she said. She called for an inquiry to find how many of the 44,000 women in mental institutions had been affected. “

 

The  15,000 figure, said Charlie Hebdo, does not take into account previous generations, immigrant women sterilised without their knowledge, in the sixties nor the inmates of psychiatric hospitals. The institutions and the parents are responsible. They are the ones who asked for the girls to be sterilised, saying they were incapable of bringing up children - said Mme Diedrich.“ It is often concerned young girls with social or affective problems who had difficulty at school.

 

 

3.2 Mayor is held over massacre of Indians in a Mexican village

On 29 December 1997 Hugh Davies reported form Washington for the Daily Telegraph. He says :

 

 An exodus of more than 4,000 frightened Mayan Indians was beginning yesterday from isolated villages in the mountains of the southern Mexican state of Chiapas amid fears of more violence from paramilitary groups who massacred 45 people, including 18 children, with rifles and machetes. The peasants, many barefoot, trudged through rain, carrying what little they had to the village of Polho, where doctors and human rights workers were organising refugee shelter and food.

 

Tension in Mexico rose as evidence emerged implicating a local mayor belonging to the ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party ( PRI ) in the killings. Identified as Jacinto Arias Cruz, he was arrested with 40 other men and accused of supplying the automatic weapons, including AK-47s used by the gunmen. He was also accused of bringing together all the participants to agree on a cover-up story. Local police apparently cordoned of the area to allow the gunmen to go about their grisly work uninterrupted.

 

Witnesses said police tried to hide the massacre, digging mass graves. Mexico’s Attorney-General Jorge Madrazo, said the “immense majority” of victims were shot in the back by high calibre weapons. The details of official involvement are being seized on by the mainly Indian rebels of the Zapatista National Liberation Army as indications that the government has no interest in settling the long running war over  issues such as land reform, equal justice and local autonomy. The guerrillas made a dramatic entry in Mexican life on Jan 1,  1994, by staging an armed uprising led by a mysterious and charismatic non-Indian calling himself Subcommander Macros. They briefly occupied the city of San Cristobal de Las Casas. The attacked village is not far from San Cristobal, now a Zapatista stronghold.

 

QUESTIONS

1. How is it possible to have such brutality in a Christian country ?.

2 What has happened is not new. When did the US government raise its

   voice?

3 Why has the Pope always been silent on such matters ?

4. Why are not missionaries rushing to help Indians throughout South

    America ?. Why are they so much interested in India ?

 

 

3.3 We are still concerned about British opinion today

* On 30/31 May and 1 June 1998 a gathering of Marathas was held in Holland. Mr and Mrs Godbole attended. In a side hall were photographs of some important Marathas, such as Lokamanya Tilak. Mr and Mrs Godbole were most upset by the captions under the photographs of Damodar Chaphekar (an assassin) and Savarkar (a convicted terrorist) The organiser tried to explain that there were contemporary British opinions. Godbole replied, “ But why do we need British opinions? Why not say that these were patriots. Chaphekar avenged the atrocities committed by British Officers in Pune during the plague outbreak of 1897, by shooting dead Mr Rand, one of the officers..  Savarkar was sentenced to transportation for life twice!! a sentence unparalleled in the history of the British Empire. We should not give a damn to the British opinion, contemporary or otherwise. “ The organisers agreed. We must get rid of this obsession with the British opinion.

 

* Mr Godbole started his prorogation of truth about Taj Mahal in 1979. During the X’mas break he had invited a group of friends at his house. He gave his first talk on the subject. A friend wrote from India, “ How many Europeans were present at the meeting ? “ meaning that unless the Europeans accept you work it is useless. Mr Godbole retorted, “ My work stands on its feet. It does not require approval by Europeans or anyone else.”

 

 

3.4 British Morality - They robbed the helpless Jews in 1939!

Louise Jury reported for the Independent on 3 April 1998. She says :-

HOLOCAUST DEBT FAMILIES GET BRITISH APOLOGY

 

The government yesterday apologised to Holocaust survivors and their families whose money and valuables were wrongly kept by British banks at the end of the Second World War. And, to the delight of Jewish organisations, it announced that an initial £2m would be made available to reimburse those with outstanding claims to settle.

 

Publishing a long awaited report on the consequences of British wartime Trading with The Enemy Legislation, Margaret Beckett, the President of the Board of Trade, said the Government was “ revolted by Nazi persecution and has the greatest sympathy for its victims and their relatives. " Provisions for the relief of victims of the Nazis at the end of the war had been “ well intentioned “ but sometimes “ insensitive to their plight “ she said.“ The present Government deeply regrets this, and I would like to apologise to those individuals and their relatives and decedents. A different attitude would be expected now. "

 

The Government came under fire last year for the way post-war bureaucracy prevented  many Jewish families from reclaiming valuables placed in Britain for safe keeping. “ Enemy assets” frozen during the war included accounts held by German and eastern European Jews. In one case, the family of a woman who killed herself rather than be taken by the Gestapo to a death camp was denied a claim, because she was not actually “detained “ as laid down in the rules. Others claimants were refused if they had been detained in a labour camp rather a death camp.

 

 

 

 

3.5 Credit to the Indian Revolutionaries at last ?

India Weekly  of 13-19 June 1997 reported “ The Indian Army is ahead of the Indian Government in evaluating the history of freedom struggle.

 

Is the history of the country’s Independence struggle all about Mahatma Gandhi, the Congress and non-violence ? At a recent function in Pune, marking the presentation of the first Veer Savarkar Award for promotion of national security awareness and strategic thinking, the Army chief, General Shankar Roy Chaudhari, sought to correct the general bias prevalent among the people.

 

Fifty years after Independence, General Chaudhari said, the country must recognise that there were two streams of the freedom struggle. The main stream of course was led by Mahatma Gandhi and was based on mass action and non-violent non cooperation. But another stream also existed. It was much smaller and yet of significance. It went back to the armed uprising of 1857 and perhaps even earlier when Indians resisted with arms the attempted entry and settlement of Europeans. The freedom fighters in Bengal, Maharashtra, South and Punjab who fought against the British with arms belonged to this second stream. Their efforts, however were uncoordinated and individualistic or in small groups. Persons like Baridnra Ghosh, Surya Sen, Jatin Das, Bhagat Singh, V V S Iyer and Veer Savarkar contributed to keeping the spirit of resistance alive till Gandhi came on the scene.

 

The Army chief recalled that the first territory to be liberated  and fly the Indian flag was Chittagong after the firebrand freedom fighters raided the armoury in the early 1930s. The Indian National Army and its war with the British and the naval mutiny were logical developments of this stream of resistance to the British  through armed struggle. General Chaudhuri also made another interesting observation. Referring to his visit to the Andaman cellular jail, now declared a national shrine, and the cell where Savarkar was kept in confinement, General Chaudhuri said that the list of people who were banished to the kalapani  and suffered for their patriotism is incomplete. Not all the names have been traced and inscribed there. The army chief pleaded for due recognition to all these who undertook the armed struggle for India’s independence. From his remarks it would appear that the Indian army is ahead of the Indian government in evaluating the history of India’s freedom struggle.

OUR COMMENTS :- Dear oh dear. What is happening in India ? What an anguish must Gandhi and Nehru feel ? Our friends in the West must be worried that we are honouring terrorists! Of course history of Europe occupied by Hitler is different. There we must not use the word Terrorist - the French, Belgians and Dutch terrorists suddenly become Members of the Resistance.

 

 

3.6 Midwives to lift boycott of Nestle ( Might is Right - once again )

The cash-strapped Royal College of Midwives yesterday pulled out of the international boycott of Nestle products, in spite of renewed evidence that formula milk manufacturers endanger the health of babies in developing countries by marketing aimed at persuading mothers to stop breast feeding. The decision of the RCM, whose members look after women in the days after childbirth when they begin breast feeding, is likely to cause a storm. Strong feelings over sponsorship from Sainsburys, who sell their own brand of formula, threatened to split the national Childbirth trust this month and ended in over 30 breast feeding counsellors resigning.

 

Midwives were divided on the issue of the boycott at their conference in May, where several baby milk companies have stalls. The midwives voiced concern over the way baby milk was being promoted and voted to end the hypocrisy of boycotting Nestle while accepting other sponsorship. They called for a review of relations with all companies. But an RCM statement indicated a wider boycott was not on the cards. Louise Silverton, the RCM’s deputy general secretary, said : “ It is far better to maintain a professional working relationship with baby milk companies, to ensure a flow of accurate and evidence based information and to try and influence their policies from the inside. "

 

The Nestle boycott began in 1977 when evidence emerged of the impact of bottle feeding on babies in developing countries. Poor families were unable to afford sufficient powdered baby milk and were over-diluting it, sometimes with unclean water and without sterilising equipment. The World Health Organisation estimates effective breast feeding could avert 1.5 million infant deaths a year. The boycott, which is endorsed by organisations in 18 countries, succeeded in persuading baby milk companies to sign an international code on marketing their products. In January a report from 27 charities and Church organisations found widespread breaches of the code. Patti Rundall, of Baby Milk Action which campaigns against the promotion of bottle feeding, said she thought it dangerous for midwives to accept money from companies such as Nestle.

 

 

4. Behaviour of Christians and Muslims today.

 

4.1 PRIEST JAILED FOR SEXUAL ABUSE OF BOYS  

 

On 1 May 1998 Owen Bowcott reported for the Guardian. He says :-

A Roman Catholic priest who sexually abused young boys in his Warwickshire orphanage and stood by while they were beaten by nuns for complaining about their ordeals, was jailed for seven years yesterday. Sentencing Eric Taylor, aged 78, Judge Marten Coates called him " a disgrace to your cloth and the church." He was found guilty at Warwick crown court of 16 charges of indecent assault and two of buggery of boys at the Father Hudson home in Coleshill between 1957 and 1965.

 

His victims, some as young as six, were so haunted by the abuse that many later withdrew into reclusive lives or turned to alcohol for comfort. At least two orphans were so guilt-ridden that they committed suicide, according to police who carried out the investigation. Another, due to appear as a witness at the trial attempted to kill himself during the prosecution's evidence.

 

Taylor had only been ordained for three years when he arrived at the Coleshill orphanage in 1957, when he was 37, the court was told. It was not long before his reign of terror began. Taylor, a heavy smoker, would spend his spare hours prowling the home's corridors searching for victims. Choirboys were abused in the vestry, altar boys kissed after mass and boys fondled during swimming lessons, the court was told.

 

Those boys who complained were usually beaten by nuns with belts, canes, wet rags or straps. " I heard the pleadings and screams of [one ] victim " a former resident told the court. " the screams for mercy as he was cowering about the floor, never being able to avoid each strike."

 

 

 * On 30 April 1998 BBC2 showed a programme at 1930 hrs entitled, “ Home Ground” Former residents of Catholic children’s homes in Scotland talk about the systematic abuse some residents reportedly suffered at the hands of carers.

 

 

4.2 Feast of slaughter in a return to the Dark Ages

On 18 April Paul Field reported from Paris for the Daily Mail. He says :-

 

As authorities turn a blind eye, families of Moslems watch the barbaric killings : It was a scene more fitting to the Dark Ages. In a field not far from Paris, hundreds of sheep were led to the slaughter in a manner which would turn the hardiest stomach. The helpless animals, legs trussed and eyes wide with terror, were slung on to makeshift wooden cribs where their heads were yanked back and their throats slit. The bloody ritual was performed in the name of Islam and its sacred Eid-el-Kebir ( Feast of Sacrifice ), celebrated each year by a billion Moslems world-wide. But there seemed little sacred about what I witnessed yesterday.  Chaos reigned. The killing was carried out wherever there was space. Children ate sandwiches as their fathers and elder brothers prepared carcasses for consumption later. To facilitate removal of the fleece, the slaughtermen made a slit in a rear leg and blew ferociously until the sheep was inflated. Then, hung from a specially erected metal spike, the animal was skinned....... It was difficult to believe such barbarity was being tolerated in the civilised world.

 

The ceremonies are clearly in breach of European regulations stating that animals must be slaughtered in licensed abattoirs. But with many of France’s five million Moslems taking part in towns and villages across the country, both the domestic authorities and EU officials turn a blind eye so as not to risk trouble. It is blindness they may find more difficult to sustain after this year’s events. Among the crowds at three of the French sites yesterday were two undercover RSPCA officers who secretly filmed the scenes. Their video evidence is to be sent to EU Agricultural Commissioner Franz Fischler to add to the pressure from a growing lobby of support for a ban on the practices.

 

‘ All the regulations are being flouted here’ said one Inspector. ‘ The sheep are clearly in distress. They are witnessing others being killed while they await their own fate. The lack of bleating is indicative of their suffering and awareness of the situation. ’ Peter Stevenson, legal director of Compassion in World Farming, said : ‘ Mr Fischler has agreed the killing of animals is illegal outside abattoirs but no one seems  willing to do anything about it. We hope that the Commission will eventually threaten to take action against France.' Many animals are likely to have been brought from Britain. France does not have sufficient numbers of the uncastrated rams which tend to be used for the festival.

 

The Daily Mail accompanied the RSPCA team to the three sites in the Paris region .... Past the entrance, to the right, were makeshift pens housing hundreds of sheep. Kneeling on mats, four Moslems dressed in white overalls recited a few verses of the Koran. They were the official slaughtermen. Four at a time the sheep were hurled on to the cribs. The more they resisted the more force was applied. Their throats were then slit. Tipped on to the ground, blood pouring from their necks, their bodies convulsed for several minutes before being carried or dragged away. Other Moslems, too impatient to wait for the butchers pulled the distressed sheep by their legs to wherever there was enough room to hold them down and cut their throats, sometimes taking several attempts with blunt knives.

 

In the pens children were obvious to the distress of the sheep, poking them with sticks and tying their legs together so that they fell over in pairs. There was little organisation. Within several square feet there could be a live sheep lying on the ground waiting for its owner to sharpen his knife, the putrid smelling intestines of another, a child throwing straw and women sitting on the ground washing blood from the offal of a massacred animal. Some flung the prepared carcasses over their shoulders and carried them home, while others used planks of wood as chopping boards to cut up the flesh before bagging it up.

 

Among the most vocal protesters has been former screen star Brigitte Bardot,

OUR COMMENTS :- We wonder why,  with such barbarity in their blood, Muslims in Europe fear racist attacks by the Nazis.

 

 

4.3 PAKISTAN’S BRETHREN FALL OUT

On 14 April 1998 Richard Galpin reported from Islamabad for the Guardian

 

For years the villagers of Shahukhel, in Pakistan’s North-West Frontier Province, lived in peace. In the picturesque village surrounded by orchards and wheat fields Sunnis and Shias lived and worked together, even building their mosques within yards of each other ( so, they have their separate mosques! even though they believe in the same Allah, same prophet Muhammad and same Koran ) But now heavily armed troops patrol the deserted streets. All the women and children, and the elderly, have fled, while the men mourn at makeshift graves inside the mosques.

 

One man, Nasrullah, wept openly at the grave of his childhood friend Habibullah. “ I am a Sunni and Habibullah was a Shia.” he said “ before we used to live here as brothers, there was never any problem or dispute between us. We never thought we would fight each other.” But Shahukhel and many other parts of Hangu district have been gripped by one of the worst outbreaks of sectarian violence ever witnessed in the province. Days of fighting have left up to 30 people dead and dozens injured. The army has been called in to restore order, and thousands of troops, paramilitary forces and police are deployed in the area. Although a curfew has been enforced in some parts, there are still reports of sporadic clashes.

 

In Shahukhel alone, 13 people were killed - almost all of them Shias - when a large force of Sunni tribesmen attacked from the surrounding hills.“ There were several thousand of them who set up positions on the hills over there.” said Syed Muhammad Sibtain, pointing to ridge less than a mile away.“ They opened fire with mortars, rocket-launchers and heavy machine guns. ” The Shias say they fought back for 30 hours but were unable to match the firepower of their opponents, who descended on the village, burning and looting. In one small courtyard Yasin Ali, a local policeman, held up the blood soaked clothes of his wife and son. A mortar round had left a gaping hole in his front wall.“

 

The attack came in the afternoon” he said “ The first shell hit my uncle’s home, killing one of my relatives and then a second mortar bomb hit this house, killing six people, including my wife and four year old son.” The bloodshed was sparked by the Shias’ annual New Year celebrations, known as Nauroz . The radical Sunni Supreme Council objected to the festivities and called for a two day strike in protest. When the celebrations went ahead, armed men opened fire on the crowd, killing at least 10 people.

 

Sunnis make up the majority of Pakistan’s population and according to one local elder, they dislike the assertiveness of the comparatively small Shia community.“ The Shias are exceeding their limits. They used to celebrate New Year in a sober way inside their mosques,” the elder said “ But now they go to the bazaars shouting slogans. Sometimes they are very provocative. " Violence has escalated between the two communities, particularly in Punjab province. Heavily armed extremists groups on both sides - widely believed to have carried out attacks in which hundreds of people have died. The Shias of Shahukhel blame the increasing influence of the Sunni extremist group Sepah-i-Sahaba ( SSP ).

 

Malik Fakhre Alam, a village elder whose house was destroyed, called for the SSP to be banned. “ If a ban is imposed on the SSP throughout the country and they are crushed, then it is possible to have peace,” he said. “ if not, there is no hope.”

 

OUR COMMENTS :-  We must learn how to exploit the differences between various Muslim factions. As Shias are a minority in Pakistan, we must take their side.

 

 

 

4.4 ISLAMIC LAW : MOTHER TO BE SHOT AFTER BABY IS BORN.

On 9 December 1997 Dennis Newson reported in the Evening Standard :-

 

A pregnant woman accused of murdering her husband has been condemned to death by a firing squad - once her baby is born. The grim fate which awaits 36 - year old Assa Larsanova as she sits in a condemned cell in Chechnya is being told for the first time tonight on German TV. Assa, who is five months pregnant was found guilty of plotting to kill her husband, whose throat was slit with a knife. The murder was carried out by her sister and a friend who were executed two hours after sentence was passed. They were driven to the Square of People’s Friendship, in Grozny, stood against a wall and shot by bursts of a machine-gun fire. The execution was watched by 5,000 people and carried live on TV

 

The judge showed more mercy to Assa, who already has three children. They ruled that she must give birth first before she is shot. Cameras from Germany’s ZDF TV channel were allowed into her prison to film her. She said : ‘ I don’t know what will happen to my baby when it is born. Who is going to look after it ?’ I am innocent. I did nothing. My sister said I was an accomplice but she was forced to make a confession.“

 

The exact procedure which will be followed when her baby is born is not clear. One version is that she will be shot immediately -said Masha Brook, who works for ZDF in Moscow. But she may be allowed to breast feed the baby and won’t be killed until the last drop of milk runs dry. It seems as though, she is resigned to her fate and has given up a hope of a reprieve. Her only chance is if her husband’s parents were to forgive her. But they are unrelenting, and may even be given a gun so they can join the firing squad.” Assa is a victim of the strict Islamic law which has been introduced following the civil war.”

 

4.5 Albanians sold as sex slaves on the streets of Italy

On 15 June 1997 John Hooper reported from Rome for the Observer. He says

 

Klodi, a 20 year old with the lilting giggle of a schoolgirl, has experienced more suffering and betrayal than most people in a lifetime. She was bought and sold, carried off against her will, and forced by savage means to do repugnant and dangerous work without reward. The people who freed her say she is one of about 15,000 young women from Albania who have been abducted from their native country and forced into prostitution on the streets of Italy.

 

Previously the people who were behind the prostitution lured girls with offers of a job, or romance or whatever, says Father Oreste Benzi, of the Pope John XXIII Association, a Roman Catholic welfare group striving to bring the women's plight into the open. ‘ Now what they are doing is kidnapping them. It is slavery. True slavery.

 

‘Klodi ( not her real name ) is from Durres on the Adriatic coast. Last week, speaking by telephone from a street location in Italy, she recounted how a friend had taken her in after she ran away from home. He was not a boyfriend, but more like a brother. We grew up together. But he betrayed her trust, selling her to two men. ‘ One of the men said he’d fallen in love with me. It was only then that I understood what had happened - he had bought me. ‘

 

Two days later, the men forced her abroad a gommone, one of a fleet of high powered semi-rigid inflatables whisking clandestine immigrants across the Adriatic to Italy. On their arrival, the men told her that she would work as a prostitute and would hand over all her earnings to them. She refused. Every day, for two weeks, they beat her and tortured her. “ They did things to my body that I couldn’t have imagined “ she says.

 

One day, in the room where she was being kept, she saw a television interview with Father Oreste. Like a lot of Albanians, Klodi understood some Italian and was able to make out that he was talking about an organisation which took care of women like her. She still cannot believe her luck. Talking about it prompts the schoolgirl giggle. ‘ It was like a sign from God.” she says. She decided to agree to prostitute herself in the hope of making contact with the Pope John XXIII Association. ‘ I was on the streets for five days. Then a boy picked me up who wasn’t like client. He was just larking about. So, I decided to tell him my story and he helped me.

 

By the grotesque standards of the pitiless traffic. Klodi was lucky. Another girl, from Pogradez, near the border with Macedonia, described how she had been dragged away from her parents garden when she went outside to call her brother in for lunch. She said she had been raped by each of the 16 men on board the vessel which carried her across the Adriatic. On arrival, they fixed the minimum that she had to earn - 600,000 lires ( £240 ) a night on weekdays and a million lire a night  ( £ 400 ) at weekends. If she failed to make enough, she had cigarettes stubbed out on her arms and knives down her ribs.

Father Oreste said kidnappers could demand and secure 25 million lire

( £10,000 ) for each girl. He is outraged by the role played by Italian men, whom he calls ‘the true criminals...perverts, lining the pockets of jailers of these wretched creatures.’   The only politician to have taken an active interest in the plight of Albania’s white slaves is a woman. Maria Paola Colombo Svevo, an MEP for the Italian Peoples’ Party, said last week that one of the problems of dealing with the phenomenon was juridical one. Italy and other European Union states were equipped with laws covering illegal migration, but lacked the means to cope with women such as Klodi, who had entered Italy illegally, but against their wills.‘

 

What is needed is to define the point at which trafficking in human beings becomes slavery she said. One result of this gap is that the only response the Italian authorities can make to a woman who reports her presence is to declare her an illegal alien and order her expulsion.‘ What the victims need is a period of legal residence that would afford them protection. These women have not made a choice. They have been coerced, ‘ she said.

 

THIS IS HAPPENING TODAY UNDER THE NOSE OF POPE HIMSELF !! WHY IS HE SILENT ABOUT IT ?

5 Research Findings

 

5.1 SWASTIKA IN BRITAIN

 

5.1.1 Swastika on the Bible

While travelling by London Underground ( October - November 1997 ) Mr Godbole saw an interesting poster at Victoria station. It was put up by the British Museum ( Library ) and showed the front cover of The Lindisfarns Gospels ( c 698 ). There are 4 swastikas on the page. 2 clockwise, 2 anticlockwise ( Vedic or Mantrik is clockwise, Tantrik is anticlockwise )

 

5.1.2 Swastika on National Savings Certificates Daily Mail  of 7 May 1998 contained some interesting information in it’s Answers to Correspondents section. The question was “ Why did National War Savings Committee certificates have swastikas on them ?”Eric Buchanen replied  as follows :-As a young schoolboy in the twenties I remember many schools offered red savings stamps popularly known as War Savings, which included a swastika in the design. These were later replaced by blue stamps which I believe, bore the head of Britannia. The swastika is an ancient symbol, regarded by many as a sacred or good luck emblem. It was a stylised representation of a wheel, depicting the travel of sun god in his chariot of fire across the sky from east to west, and is believed to have originated in ancient Egypt. The right-handed swastika depicted on our savings stamps pre-dated Adolph Hitler and his Nazi paraphernalia by many years. The Nazi swastika was a rare example of a left handed swastika.

 

 

5.2 Roots of Christianity

5.2.1 When was Jesus born ?

Letter by C R Malyan of London was published in the Evening Standard  of 10 December 1997. He says,

Lord Tanlaw and J C L Sharp ( Letters, 27 November, 3 December ) are up the creek with 2001 as starting date of the third millennium. The latter begins simultaneously with the end of the second millennium at midnight on 31 December 1999. Dr Potter is simply ‘ pouring water on troubled oil. ‘ placing Christ’s birth at 4 BC  ( Letters, 3 December ). However, the historian Robin Lane Fox puts Christ’s birth at 8 BC and this estimate is now generally accepted. “

 

Does this not make a mockery of the millennium celebrations ?

 

5.2.2 Happy Saturnalia

On 22 December 1997, The Times published a letter by Nicholas Walter of Rationalist Press Association. He says:-

 

Christmas is a tricky business. The problem with trying to reclaim it for Christianity ( letter December 17 ) is that for centuries the inhabitants of the Roman Empire celebrated midwinter as the pagan Saturnalia or the Mithraic Day of the Unconquered Sun, until the Christian authorities eventually decided that it coincided with the birthday of their founder and claimed it as their own. Most people nowadays are simply reclaiming the festival for its original purposes. And the problem with telling children that Father Christmas doesn’t exist ( report, December 18 ) is that for many people the same is true of Jesus, after all, there is far more evidence for Father Christmas.

 

 

5.3 Post War Imperialism

Daily Mail  of 8 December 1997 contained an interesting piece of information in its Answers to Correspondents column. The question was “ Did the British Army re-arm Japanese prisoners of war to fight against rebels in Vietnam in 1945 and 1946 before handing the problem over to the French? "

 

* Kevin Heneghan replied as follows :- Further to earlier answer, 40,000 Japanese prisoners of war were re-armed by the British in the fight against nationalists in Vietnam. Some were re-issued with weapons captured at the fall of Singapore. Maj Gen Douglas D Gracey, in charge of SACSEA Control Commission No 1, to which my small Intelligence Corps unit was attached, was within his rights under regulations issued by President Truman’s American government. But the Allied Supreme Commander, Gen Douglas MacArthur, declared ‘ If there’s anything that makes my blood boil, it is to see our Allies in Indo-China deploying Japanese troops to reconquer the little people we promised to liberate.’

 

To Vietnamese nationalists ( whom we called Annamites ), use of the Japanese against them was a blatant example of British perfidy.Their country had been ruthlessly exploited by the French since 1862. In World War II with American aid, they had fought against a Japanese bolstered Vichy French regime and fully expected independence after the war, but Churchill was determined to re-instate the French. He believed nationalism was contagious and could affect Burma and India.

 

* D Curtis replied as follows :-Though McArthur complained, the Americans were not above adopting the same tactics. To keep the U S out of Korea in 1945, the Soviets installed a government sympathetic to themselves and occupied the country north of the 38th parallel, ostensibly to disarm the Japanese occupation forces. The U S ordered the Japanese Military Command in the south to maintain control until U S forces could arrive, doing exactly what the British had done in French Indo-China and the Dutch East Indies.

 

 

5.4. British Barbarity

5.4.1 Treatment of the Jews in 1948

Many Indians still believe that after Indian independence the British suddenly became much civilised, since they had to concede Indian independence due to Gandhi’s non-violence. This is far from truth. After World War II the question of Jews in Europe came to a head. Most Jews wanted to go to Palestine ( Israel ). British vehemently opposed their plans. Many attempts by Jews were foiled by the British. Particularly brutal was the ramming of the ship Hagana : Exodus 1948. British forces attacked it in international waters, forced the refugees onto another vessel to return to France, from where they had started their journey. They refused to disembark in France. French authorities flatly refused to force them to do so. The ship sailed for Germany. British Military Police, under instruction of British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin, attacked these helpless refugees and forced them to get off. They were marched to concentration camps from where they were liberated. All this is documented and shown on TV on the occasion of 50th anniversary of founding of the state of Israel. 

 

5.4.2  Treatment of Africans in 1959

A lot has been said about Enoch Powell after his death in April 1998. One of his contribution was for freedom of countries of East Africa. Brian Sewell reported for the Evening Standard on 21 April 1998, “ ... That he was not a racist in any conventional sense is evident to anyone who cares to consult his courageous philippic against the Conservative government in 1959, when 11 half starved Mau-Mau prisoners of Kenyan authorities directly responsible to the Colonial Secretary were bludgeoned to death by their warders for refusing to undertake slave labour; the risk of sacrifice to which he then exposed his political career was brave indeed, and for a few black men who had murderously opposed white rule, far away from Wolverhampton, easily dismissed as savages - but Powell was a man who believed in human rights and in the value of other men’s cultures as much as his own. “

 

We are only concerned with barbarity of British Rule in Africa, at this stage. Yes, they were barbarous enough to bludgeon to death the freedom fighters, even in 1959! Let us not make a fool of ourselves.

 

 

5.5 Subhash Chandra Bose & Muslims

 

1997 marked the birth centenary of Subhash Chandra Bose. Many tributes have been paid to him. However nobody has written anything about his constant capitulations to Muslim demands. Time has come to look at this important subject.

 

In 1920 Bose stood 4th in the ICS examination. However, he decided not to serve the British, came to India in July 1921, met Gandhiji who asked him to see Chittaranjan Das in Calcutta. Terrible atrocities were committed by Mopla Muslims on Hindus of Malbar ( Kerala ) during August - December 1921. Neither Bose nor Das rushed to help the Hindus affected by the riots. Throughout Bose’s writings there is no mention of any anguish that he felt. Very briefly he says, “ True Moplas did commit some atrocities but they fought against the British. “ That is all. After Malbar Muslims carried out terrible riots in Gulbarga, Nagpur, Lucknow, Shahjahanpur, Prayag, Jabalpur and Kohat. Bose kept quiet about all these riots.

 

In a speech of 1922 Das said, “ When Congress comes to power and runs Calcutta City Corporation, 60% of all municipal vacancies will be reserved for Muslims.” There was no pact with Muslims to join forces against the British. It was simply a madness inherited from Gandhi. Bose was of course a disciple of Das

 

In 1928 Bose met Dr Hedgewar ( founder of the RSS ). Hedgewar felt amazed and sorry that a young intellect like Bose was obsessed with fantasy of Hindu Muslim unity.  

 

Government of India Act 1935, assured a majority to Muslims in Bengal. Their Chief Minister  ( probably Fazul Huq ) said, “ In Bengal Muslims are 51% of the population but 60% of Government vacancies will be reserved for them, irrespective of whether or not they are qualified. “ The result was that if B A degree was the qualification for a particular job a Hindu candidate was asked questions of M A standard, whereas a Muslim candidate was asked to sit a paper of Matriculate standard. Bose kept mum about this lunacy. That was not all Sharad Chandra Bose said that despite this policy Muslims do not pass, so government should have a simple test, once Muslims pass it they should get the job. What insanity!!

 

In May 1939 Bose was outmanoeuvred by Gandhi and had to resign as President of the Congress Party. He immediately started the Forward Block. That party  was eager to capitulate to Muslim demands and sough co-operation of Muslim League, but considered Hindu Mahasabha as communal organisation - a political plague. Bose clearly felt that unless Hindu Mahasabha was crushed India had no salvation. On 1 August 1939 Savarkar said in a speech at Pune, “ From the point of view of protecting Hindu interests Gandhi is bad, but Bose is worse than Gandhi.” He clearly implied that Bose was more dangerous to Hindus than Gandhi. What changed this situation ?

 

In June 1940 Bose came to Mumbai. He was seeking a solution to the Hindu Muslim problem. According to newspaper reports ‘ he went to outbid Gandhi ‘ justifying Savarkar’s concerns. Jinnah asked, “ On whose behalf are you going to negotiate with me ? “ Bose said, “ On behalf of the Congress Party. “ But they have ousted you. “ said Jinnah.“ I am a leader of the Forward Block. “ said Bose.“ Sure. “ said Jinnah, “ But Forward Block does not represent interests of the Hindus. So, how can you negotiate on behalf of Hindus ? If Savarkar was to negotiate, it has some meaning as he represents Hindu Mahasabha which protects Hindu interests. Why don’t you go and see him.? "

 

Bose became wiser after this rebuke. He saw Savarkar who advised him to get out of the country and form the Indian National Army. Even then Bose wasted time, got arrested for agitation for removal of the so called Black Hole of Calcutta Monument, repented, escaped from internment and eventually did what Savarkar asked him to do. For that adventure we shall always be grateful to him.

 

There are two books on the subject. Indian Freedom Struggle and India at Cross Roads. They should be studied to appreciate the gravity of Bose’s attitude towards Muslims from 1920 to 1940.

 

Today RSS and BJP are committing the same mistakes that Bose made. On 12 November 1996 two aeroplanes collided mid-air near Delhi. Most of the passengers were Muslims. And who rushed to help them ? RSS workers! They even buried the dead. What did they get in return ? Thanks for one day may be. But have we not seen this before ? YES. During Indira Gandhi’s emergency of 1977.  Muslim fanaticism returns after a few months and continues to flourish. 

 

It is astonishing that RSS have learnt nothing from the past. Sangh Sandesh of UK proudly reported the help given to Muslim victims or aircrash in their issue of Nov-Dec 1996, but said nothing about the Noakhali massacre of October 1946!  Whole RSS organisation behaved as is they were dead to the

Hindus of Noakhali

 

Hindu Muslim unity is a mirage. It will only be achieved when Muslims clamour for it. NOT otherwise.  

 

 

6. We Hindus are treated badly, but do we deserve better ?

 

6.1 Mentality in India

In February 1998 our friend Mr Ramakrishnayya was in India. When he fell ill he went to Sai Baba Hospital at Puttaparthy ( Andhra Pradesh ). His name was taken down by the attendant and he was asked to wait in the queue. He waited for half an hour. Two European girls came in. They were immediately seen by the doctor. When Ramakrishnayya protested the manager said, " Oh, you feel that it is wrong to give special treatment to Europeans because you suffer racial discrimination in England. But we are civilised people in India. We consider it our duty to treat Europeans first. After all they are guests in our country. Our religion teaches us ' Atithi Devo Bhava ' ( treat a guest as god )

 

6.2 Misconceptions about India

Indian economy has grown considerably over last 30 years. There are many business opportunities for people than used to be the case. Two years ago Mr Godbole asked his colleague, “ One of my nephews has got a degree in Electronics. Guess what he is doing now. “ “ A Bus Conductor ? “ said the Indian lady who game from East Africa.“ He is a horticulturist. He sells flowers all over Europe, including Covent Garden in London. “ replied Mr Godbole

 

6.3 Tourism in India

While studying for Membership of the Chartered Institute of Transport Mr Godbole’s tutor was teaching Tourism and Transport. There was a global map on the board. Naturally the question of Tourism in India arose. Mr Godbole was asked for information on the subject. Before he could answer another Indian who came from Tanzania said, “ .... if you can get on the train, you will probably find a seat near the toilet...” Mr Godbole replied, “ That is not true. In 1990 I travelled 3000 miles on Indian Railways. All the routes were planned by Mr Dandapani the travel agent from London and seats reserved from here. Even on the smallest stations like Udaipur the Station Master knew when we were travelling and by which train. He would say, ‘ ah, the Godboles. you go to bogey number so and so and you should stand at such and such a place ’  I had no problem whatsoever. Whole class of 15 students was surprised. But just consider the pathetic remark of the Indian from Tanzania!

 

6.4 Wife of British Prime Minister in sari - Indian women in western dress

Cherie Blair, dressed in a traditional Indian sari, stole the show at a gala banquet to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Indian independence. Mrs Blair, accompanying her husband to the Grosvenor House Hotel dinner succeeded in upstaging the guest of honour, Prince Charles, on the eve of his 49th birthday. She wore a bright turquoise and vivid pink silk sari revealing a partially bared midriff, adorned with a gold necklace and matching sandals.

[ Evening Standard  14 November 1997 ] And Indian women ? Oh, they wore western style designer outfits!!. !

Daily Mail of 14 November 1997 published a coloured photo of Mrs Blair on the front page.

Why should the world treat us with respect ??

 

 

7 Acknowledgement

 

We are grateful to the following for their help :-

 

For transmitting our newsletter 32, and preface to Mr Godbole's book on

Rationalism of Veer Savarkar,  on the Internet

Sudesh Sangray of Luton    

 

For delivering a parcel of our newsletters, and manuscript of Rationalism of

Veer Savarkar, to India

Arvind Kulkarni of Thane, India 

 

For making copies of our newsletter and distributing them to friends :-

Dina Nath Behl of London, Dr Godbole of Rochdale.

 

Dr A P Valvade and a anonymous friend from Pune, India

 

Dr Ramesh Bambal of America

 

For posting copies or our newsletter 32 in India

Dr V Bedekar, of Thane, India

 

For donating money for publication of Mr Godbole's book  Rationalism. of

Veer Savarkar

Dr Godbole of Rochdale                              £50

Mr Mukesh Patel of Milton Keynes  £100

 

Mr Thakur of Sevenoaks                              Rs 2,500

 

 

8 Publicity and Appreciation

 

8.1 Sangh Mail, a newsletter of RSS workers, on 2 February 1998,  carried a news of Mr Godbole's slide show  - Taj Mahal : Facts and Fantasies, held at Hounslow, on 7 January 1998 .

 

 

8.2 Following books are available from Mr Godbole :-

 

1. Taj Mahal : Simple Analysis of a Great Deception.

 

2. Why Rewrite Indian History ?

 

3. Taj Mahal and the Great British Conspiracy.

This book has 338 pages and describes our mental bankruptcy over last 200 years. Price £6 including postage, or £5 if you collect personally in London.

 

4. Chhatrapati Shivaji by Setu Madhavarao Pagdi

English biography of Shivaji. Price £3 plus postage.

 

5. Vedic Mathematics

 

 

8.3 Please help by :-

 

* acknowledging the receipt of this newsletter to the following address :-

Mr V S Godbole                    ( Tel No 01234 - 357388 )

14 Turnberry Walk

Bedford

MK 41, 8 AZ

U K

If you receive the newsletter by E Mail please acknowledge receipt to the sender.

* sending money to Mr Godbole ( in pound sterling or Indian rupees )

* making 5 copies of this newsletter and sending them to your friends.

* circulating this newsletter among your friends ( send them on E mail ).

* trying to get parts of this newsletter published in various newspapers,  

  magazines and periodicals.

* arranging slide shows by Godbole at various social functions.

* purchasing books from Mr Godbole.