INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INTO TRUE HISTORY

 

NEWSLETTER NO.37 OF 16 OCTOBER 2001

 

 

1. NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS

1.1 An Apology

We are sorry that we could not produce the Newsletters of 16 February and 16 June

 

1.2 Change of E Mail address

Shree Godbole can now be contacted on – v.godbole3@ntlworld.com

 

1.3 Rationalism of Veer Savarkar ( in Marathi )

Review of this book by Shree Godbole appeared in the Divali 1999 issue of Ekata monthly, a Marathi monthly of RSS published from Pune.

Another review by Shree Gopal Godse appeared in the Marathi daily Samana of Shivasena of Mumbai on 3 December 2000.

 

1.4 Rationalism of Veer Savarkar ( in English )

 

Godbole has started work on an English version of his book in Marathi. He would like to complete it by February 2003. The Prologue / Preface, Parts I, II and III are now ready. Parts IV and V are being checked

 

1.5 Might is right

Jiang Zemin President of China visited Britain in October 1999. And all the liberal traditions in Britain were set aside so that he would not be angry. He does not like any protests and the British Government obliged.

 

Evening Standard reported on 21 October ( Londoner’s diary )

Dalai Lama exiled from Tussaud’s

“ President Jiang Zemin has effortlessly imported Beijing style oppression to London. Staff at Madame Tussaud’s were ordered to remove a waxwork of the Dalai Lama on Tuesday ahead of Chinese president’s visit to the museum. The reason? To spare the visiting dignitary the inconvenience of facing a model of the old monk.”

 

“ Yesterday a Madame Tussaud’s spokesman, Fiona Piere, explained the affront by saying: ‘ It is the honourable thing to do in view of the fact that the Dalai Lama is totally against the President’s political and religious beliefs. This was done on our own initiative to avoid offence.”

Today, though, Tussaud’s are censoring their own censorship by denying the democratic meltdown ever took place. The waxworks’ chief P.R, Diane Moon, tells me ‘ There’d be no need to do that – I don’t understand it. The President wouldn’t have even seen the figure – he came in and went to the studios for a sitting.’

Alison Reynolds, director of Free Tibet, is appalled at Tussaud’s dictatorial airbrushing: ‘It is absurd example of kowtowing to China. I think it’s possible that the Chinese President would have been offended and this demonstrates the extent of his paranoia – he’s even afraid of a waxwork.’

 

* In a similar move, books criticising China’s human rights abuses and genocide in Tibet disappeared from shelves in libraries in Oxford and Cambridge Universities. 

 

On 21 October Metro reported on page 7

‘ Protesters haunt Jiang as UK strikes 2 billion pound deal.’

Human rights protesters yesterday continued to dog Chinese president Jiang Zemin on the day two of his historic visit to Britain.

As police battled to subdue demonstrators, it was announced Britain had clinched 2 billion pounds of trade deals with the Communist country.

The privately negotiated agreements will make the U.K the biggest European investor in China.

Security surrounding the visit was tight but one protester managed to break through police barrier near the Millennium Dome. David Wetton, 55 got to within a yard of the leader shouting ‘ free Tibet’ He was pulled away by four police officers, arrested and charged with breach of the peace. After his release, Mr Wetton said : ‘ I have always felt very strongly about Tibet and what’s going on in China. I just wanted to get as close as I could and shout something to the president because he doesn’t like protesters’

 

The extent of the Met operation aimed at stifling protests angered demonstrators.

 

In Greenwich Park, police invoked a little known bylaw to disperse protesters because they did not have written permission from the Royal Parks Agency to gather there. The move prompted one group to claim officers had violated their civil rights. They said the Met was acting on orders from Whitehall after China warned protests would sour relations between the two countries.

 

Jo Farley, a protester at the Greenwich visit, said : ' It is ridiculous, what the police are doing, because this is a peaceful demonstration and this is supposed to be a democratic country. Our Government is just sucking up to the Chinese.’

 

The Met denied it had overreacted. A Met spokesman said : ‘It is our objective to strike an appropriate balance ensuring safety of the president of the Chinese republic whilst facilitating legitimate protest.’

 

Among the deals announced was a 500 million pound agreement between National Power, Hunan Province in China, and Greenwich Nat West, HSBC and ING Barings banks for a power plant and 10million pound contract between Marconi Communications and China’s Railways.

 

** The extent of police high-handedness can be gathered from letters to the editor of the Daily Telegraph of 21 October 1999. Here they are under the title A disgraceful use of police force:-

Alan Stevens wrote, “ I am appalled by the heavy-handed treatment meted out to some members of the crowds demonstrating against the visit of Jiang Zemin. He is the leader of arguably the most repressive regime in the world today, one that perpetrates massive human rights abuses against not only its own people, who have no rights to free speech or proper democratic elections, but also those in Tibet, which has been virtually destroyed. “.

 

“ Who issued the orders to police officers on duty to be so repressive ? They appear to have been politically motivated.”

 

“ Jiang Zemin was warmly greeted by Tony Blair and Robin Cook with double-handed handshakes. That we should be so obsequious is obscene. It beggars belief.”

-----

David and Lorraine Morhen of Kent wrote, “ How awful it was to see police in London using strong-arm force to smother and constrain flag-wavers and people merely shouting at a procession down the Mall.

It was such a different reaction to what is usually expected from crowds lined along that thoroughfare.

Tony Blair should realise that people in this country remember the images of Tinanmen Square. What price Labour’s ethical policy now ?”

____

Simon Orme of London wrote, “ The Chinese dissidents must have felt quite at home in the Royal Parks. Denied the right to assemble and demonstrate. Flags and posters confiscated. Detained.

How thoughtful of the Government. How disgraceful.”

____

Viscount Montgomery of London said, “ It seems extraordinary that the day after condemning Pakistan for suspending democracy, our Government has formally welcomed Mr Jiang. “

 

 

1.6 Chhatrapatee Shivaji dominates Agra Fort now

On 20 February 2001 Shree Yogesh Kulkarni (yogeshkulkarni@hotmail.com ) sent us an E Mail.

 

It was yet another historic moment. .. a grand and imposing statue of

Shivaji was installed just in front of the Red Fort, Agra. And guess who unveiled the statue? None other than the Union Home Minister L K Advani.

 

Sporting a red Maratha turban and big tilak on his forehead, Advani recapped

History for a while. Admitting that the great Maratha warrior was his ideal,

Advani said that the country needs a statesman like Shivaji who can lead it

from the front." A fearless and firm leadership like Shivaji can make the

difference. He should be our role model", asserted Advani.

 

While addressing a gathering near the fort, Mr Advani said that Shivaji and

Veer Savarkar were the two giants of modern Indian history who influenced his mind in the childhood." I read a book The grand rebel and was mesmerised by the qualities and greatness of the warrior legend who sowed the seeds of Indian independence. On Chatrapati's birth anniversary I feel proud to be given the opportunity to unveil his statue," he added.

 

The Home Minister said that there are hundreds of statues of Shivaji in the

country ."From Mumbai to Raigarh and Gujarat to Delhi one can see so many

statues of Shivaji. But what we see here is something different. This

statue, installed just in front of the fort, has its own historical relevance and sanctity. For a patriot this place now could be another pilgrimage," he said.

 

Earlier Union Minister of Heavy Industries, Manohar Joshi said that he had come to know from the organisers that local MP refused to attend this function." It's sad that despite being a non-political function, an MP of a particular party did not join us. I feel Shivaji belonged to all of us. I could have come here even if I was not granted invitation," he said. Maharshtra Chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh demanded that a statue of Shivaji should be installed inside the parliament."

 

I would request Advanji and my friend Manohar Joshi that the Union

Government in Delhi should consider my demand. I feel that Shivaji was one

of the greatest statesman India had. He was the leader of leaders," he said.

 

Our comments :- Now it is time to follow the footsteps of Shivaji. We must resolve to kill those in Pakistan who tortured our soldiers in Kargil conflict two years ago and burn the Bangladeshi villagers who gruesomely murdered India Border Security Force jawans in April 2001.

 

1.7 Brtish pronunciations of our words

The British Press and T.V want to go back to the imperial days. During the Kumbh Mela days they used the word Ganges instead of Ganga ( Evening Standard 24 January 2001, Metro 15 January, p16; Times 12 January p20 and Sunday Telegraph 7 January, p28 ), during the conflict between American power company Enron and Government of Maharashtra they started to use Bombay instead of Mumbai (Financial Times 21 May 2001, p8)

Of course, they never use the word Peking, they will say Beijing

 

1.8 Godbole’s visit to Hindusthan ( April /May 2001 )

Mr and Mrs Godbole visited Pune for a marriage ceremony.

Meetings

* During his stay it was extremely difficult to get out of the house, the temperatures soaring to 42 degrees centrigrade. Still Godbole managed to meet some friends

>> Prof Asnani holds a gathering of a group of about 30 people who meet at his house to discuss problems facing the Hindu society, on the first Sunday of each month. A special meeting was called for Godbole who explained the activities of Muslims in England, something they would never read in Indian newspapers. He said ‘ We are threatened by Muslims even in England. We may dislike them, but they have a vision, a mission. And what are Hindus doing ? They gather in temples and their activities are restricted to – bhajan, bhojan, puja and prasad and go home. You suggest a slight change and they will consider that you are mad.’

‘ After the Dutch granted independence to Indonesia some Indians migrated to Holland from Surinam. One of them attended Godbole’s special tour of London in 1997. After the end of the tour the participants were sitting in the office of Arya Samaj, in Ealing, West London. There was a slogan on the wall ‘ gaurase kaho, hum Hindu hai.’ This gentleman in his 70s asked Dr Acharya, the resident priest of Arya Samaj to remove the slogan. He considered it an insult to be called a Hindu. When we are facing relentless attack by Muslims this our attitude!!’

At Prof Asnani’s house Godbole also met Prof P N Oak, Londhe, Milind Joshi, Mamdapurkar, Sippy, Mehendale and Muzumdar. Godbole promised to keep in touch with the group by E Mail.

 

>> Afterwards it was decided to hold another meeting in Mr Londhe’s flat in Kothrud. This time Godbole met Ashok Athawale ( formerly of Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur ) Smt Anuradha Khot (a Hindu Maha Sabha worker from Mumbai ), Saharashtrabuddhe, Moregavakar, Deshpande and Vasant Apte.

Prof More of Nanded has written an excellent book on Koran in Marathi. Knowing the sensitivity of the issue he published the book himself and it is not for sale. Mr Godbole was given a copy with his compliments.

After the massacre of Hindus in Noakhali in November 1946, Muslims tried to do the same in Bihar. But Hindus were prepared and Muslims paid heavily. Angered by this Nehru and Patel crushed Hindus of Bihar mercilessly. That history is still unknown. Balshastri Hardas of Nagpur wrote an eyewitness account in his book ‘ what I saw in Bihar ?‘ It was immediately banned by Sardar Patel. Apte said that he could get hold of a copy of that book. Godbole is waiting for the book.

 

* Godbole also met Dr Shreerang Godbole, a specialist in diabetes. He had known about Godbole’s works for some time, but the two never met.

* Godbole met Dr P V Vartak who had written excellent books on Ramayan and Mahabharat. Godbole made suggestions for improvements.

* Godbole also met M S Dixit, an historian. He had started a movement to fix plaques on houses associated with great men and women of Pune, for example revolutionary Vasudev Balvant Phadake, Dr Anandi Gopal Joshi

( first Indian doctor to qualify in America in 1887 ). It was sad to note that the anti- Brahmin feeling still mars even such work. Dixit approached Saraswat Bank, owners of the building where Justice Ranade once lived. They refused permission for a plaque in his name. The plaque has therefore been fixed on an adjoining house with an arrow showing the place of Ranade’s residence.

 

• Unity of the Hindu nation

The Ambabai of Kolhapur is the family deity of Godboles. He therefore visited that temple. While wandering in precinct he came across a notice in Kannada language. The notice in Marathi stated that if people want to make any donations in the name of the Goddess they should seek an official receipt. After making enquiries Godbole was told that Kannada speaking Hindus consider it a duty to make pilgrimage to this temple. She is their revered Goddess too. Similarly Vithoba is revered by both communities.

This incident reminded him of Kannada inscription in Pune. Godbole had been visiting the Parvati temple in Pune since childhood. In 1981 he was surprised to find inscription in Kannada on the front door of Kartikswami temple on the Parvati hill. He made enquiries and was told, “ Maratha women do not visit this temple. Once a Kannada Hindu visited Parvati. He also visited other temples on the hill. He was surprised to know there was a temple of Kartikswami ( elder brother of Lord Ganesha ). He requested that a notice in Kannada to be written on the front door. For some unknown reason Kannada women do visit this temple. “

 

• Other impressions

Road transport in Maharashtra is much improved. In many places bridges are built by private contractors who are allowed to charge a levy. After certain number of years these bridges become the property of the Government of Maharashtra. An excellent scheme.

-There are central dividers on many roads, which helps traffic to flow smoothly

- On highways the petrol pumps have much improved in appearance and services they provide.

- Dr Bhide of 2 Budhwar Peth, Pune has inherited a family house some 250 years old. Part of the front was lost during road widening. But he has rebuilt the house with old style bricks, mortar and timber. His determination is worth praising.

 

• It is worth noting how mass media moulds the attitude of people. Even when the temperatures were reaching 42 degrees centigrade, male newscasters always wore ties, and ladies have hair cut like Europeans.

 

1.9 Godbole’s visit to Canada

Godboles visited Canada for the Marathi Sammelan in Calgary during 29 June / 2 July 2001. One expects usual entertainment programmes, but in addition there were two major events.

* Dr Vijay Bhatkar was the Chief Guest. He is a computer wizard. He could have lived a life of luxury in America, but he returned to Hindusthan and in record time of three years he developed the Super Computer. PARAM 8000 in 1991. In 1998 he built PARAM 10,000 one of the world’s largest supercomputers.

 

* Dr Abhay Bang and his wife were educated in Hindusthan and went to America for further studies ( John Hopkins University). But instead of living a life of luxury they too decided to devote their life for uplift of the poor tribal people in the forests of Gadchiroli district near Nagpur. The audience was thrilled by the slides he showed and gave him a standing ovation. Many were in tears at what the doctor and his wife had done.

 

* We also met Dr Mandke. He left U.K and has started a hospital for heart operations in Mumbai. His aim is that no one should be denied heart surgery simply because he or she is poor.

 

Yes, we do have such people. Why should we be disheartened?

1.10 British Justice

The Sun reported on 23 August ‘Top copper escapes speed cameras fine’

Fury erupted last night after a police chief escaped a fine – by claiming he couldn’t remember who was driving when his car was caught by a speed camera.

 

Highflying Det Supt Adrian Roberts had his speeding ticket scrapped following a meeting with another senior officer.

But angry colleagues have now forced a review, and motoring groups demanded he be prosecuted.

Mr Roberts 36, was head of Cleveland Police traffic unit when it introduced mobile speed cameras in 1997.

Now head of Middlesborough CID, he wrote to his force after his Citrogen Ax was photographed breaking a 30 mph limit on April 8 – a Sunday.

He said he could not remember who was behind the wheel.

 

Supt Graham Cummings, in the Administration of Justice Department scrapped the ticket after deciding the photo did not identify the driver.

But it is a crime for the registered owner of a car to fail to name the person driving at the time of a speeding offence.

Members of the public who used Mr Robert’s explanation would still face a fine and penalty points.

One senior cop said last night “ This smacks of a cosy deal being done, of one rule for the police and one for the public.”

 

Mr Roberts was sent a letter after his car was caught in Stockton-on-Tees.

He was given the choice between accepting a 60 pound fine and three penalty points or pleading not guilty.

 

Senior source said “ there is real anger within the force. It’s ridiculous to suggest that a superintendent cannot recall what he was doing on a Sunday a few weeks earlier. There seems to have been no questions asked, such as who else was insured to drive the car and if they could recall what they were doing.”

 

 

2. AROUND LONDON TOUR OF PLACES ASSOCIATED WITH INDIAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS

 

2.1 Mr Godbole conducted four such tours

* First one was organised by Ajit Vartak on 22 March 2001. Fourteen of his friends attended.

 

* Second one was on 28 July. 30 people mostly Computer Engineers attended. Out of them 20 were led by Tushar Bapat. Ninad Chhatre, Milind Bhave and his wife Sau Aboli, Ajit Vartak and his wife and parents, Rahul Kulkarni, Anant Jukkalakar attended. 

 

* Third one was arranged on 18 August. 26 people, mostly Computer Engineers attended including an Englishman.Some of them were Sujata Tyagi and her friend, Shree and Sau Angle, Vinayak Ambekar, Padmakar Khandekar, Ravindra Savant, Sanjay Athavale, Shree and Sau Kshirsagar, Ashish Bokil,.Bipin Patel, Mangesh Kulkarni and his wife, Rahul Rasal It started to rain by 6 p.m. Godbole therefore changed the plan. When the party reached Warwick Avenue it was still raining. The question was – should we abandon the tour here ? One young lady said, “ our forefathers suffered so mush for us. Can we not bear getting wet for a while.” And all the participants followed Godbole to 10 Howley Place where Tilak once lived.

 

* Fourth one was on 29 September. 8 people attended. They were Pradeep Kale and his mother, Mrs Bembalkar, Gopal Agarwal, Shirish Dhamnekar ad their friends.

 

* Full description of the tour has now been extensively revised. It runs into 46 pages and is available by E Mail

 

* Godbole was surprised to get a call from Indian High Commission. One of the first Secretaries had asked for details of Godbole’s tour.

 

* A high-ranking officer of Government of Maharsahtra was also interested in the tour. Unfortunately he could not attend the tours in July and August. However, he did meet Godbole along with his friend Dr Tanaji Acharya.

 

2.2 Slide shows

Dr Agarkar of Kalyan, Maharashtra, conducts slide shows of the tour

 

* In October 2000 he had been to Nanded to deliver a lecture on Scientific Temper and Human Development. After this lecture a slide show on London Tour was arranged by Prof. R K Deshpande. It was liked by many. Sikhs have a big Gurudwara in the city. The incidence of Jalianwala bag is mentioned in their exhibition. They therefore appreciated the information regarding Madanlal Dhingra and Udhamsingh very much.

 

* On 10 February 2001 he conducted another slide show on London tour for the students of standards VII and VIII in Shardashram Vidyamandir, Dadar
Mumbai. There were about 220 students for the show. The programme was
received very well. Shardashram is a famous school in Dadar area. Sachin Tendulakar the present cricket hero was the student of this school.

 

 

3 Historical findings

3.1 Origins of Christianity

The Daily Mail publishes some interesting information in its column ‘Coffee Break’ On 17 November 2000 we found -

How did All Hallows Day ( November 1 ) become the modern All Saints Day ?

Prof Jack Santinoi of Department of Popular Culture, Bowling Green State University, Ohio explains

Halloween, the eve of or day before All Hallows Day, has its origin in an ancient, pre-Christian festival of the dead. The Celtic peoples, once found all over Europe, divided the year by four major holidays. According to their calendar, the year began on a day corresponding to November 1 on our calendar, which marked the beginning of winter.

It was a time when cattle and sheep were moved to lower pastures and all livestock were secured for the winter months. Crops were harvested, so the date marked both an ending and a beginning in an eternal cycle.

This festival was called Samhain ( pronounced Sah-ween ) and was the biggest and most significant holiday of the Celtic year.

The Celts believed that at this time, the ghosts of the dead were able to mingle with the living, because at Samhain the souls of those who had died during the year travelled into the other world.

People gathered to sacrifice animals and offer gifts of fruits and vegetables. They also lit bonfires in honour of the dead, aiding them on their journey and keeping them away from the living.

Samhain became Halloween when Christian missionaries attempted to change the religious practices of the Celts.

In 601 A.D Pope Gregory I issued an edict to his missionaries concerning the beliefs and customs of the peoples he hoped to convert.

Rather than trying to obliterate these practices, he instructed his missionaries to use them. If a group of people worshipped a tree, rather than cut it down, he advised them to consecrate it to Christ and allow it to continue to be worshipped.

Church holy days were set to coincide with native holy days. Christmas, for instance, was celebrated on December 25 because it corresponded with the pre-Christian mid-winter celebration. In 610, Pope Boniface IV converted the Pantheon in Rome into a Christian church dedicated to martyrs.

A festival called All Hallows Day, deriving from the Old English halig meaning ‘holy’ and devised to honour every Christian saint, especially those who didn’t have a special day was originally held on May 1. But, in the spirit of Pope Gregory I, this was changed in 834 to November 1 to substitute for Samhain and drew the devotion of the Celtic peoples.

The traditional Celtic deities diminished on status, becoming the fairies or leprechauns of more recent tradition.

 

3.2 Temple bell in Kolhapur – forgotten Maratha History

Chimaji Appa, younger brother of Maratha Peshwa Bajirao I defeated the Portuguese in India in 1735 at Vasai, some 30 miles from Mumbai. After their defeat Chimaji removed four of their church bells and presented them as war trophies to Shahu, grandson of Shivaji. One of them was presented to the temple Mahalaxmi in Kolhapur, where it remained for 161 years, from 1740 till 1901 when it started to crack. It has inscriptions in Portuguese as follows :-

Hail! Many Full of Grace the Lord is with three – GRAITA PLENA DOMINVS TECVM AVE MARIA HIS. At present it is kept in a museum in the Town Hall.

When Godbole went to Kolhapur in 1990 he made enquiries about the bell only to find that even residents of Kolhapur had forgotten about our glorious past. This is probably the only example in the History of Hindus where a status symbol of a foreigner decorated a temple.

Our comment :- What happened to other three bells ?

( Ref :- Article in Tarun Bharat of Kolhapur of 21 March 2001, p10 )

 

 

3.3 Indian Classical Music belongs to Hindus

Sakal, the Marathi language daily of Pune carries some interesting stories. On 3 May 2001 it carried a feature of famous singer Pandit Ramkrushnabuva Vaze.

Vaze was born in Ozare, in Goa in 1872. His deep interest in Music brought him to Mumbai and then to Gwalior where he studied music under Nisar Husein Khan. After having spent 30 years in the northern India Vaze returned to Maharashtra. He was asked by well known Moderate leader G.K.Gokhale,

“ why don’t you write history of our Music ? “ Surprisingly he was asked the same question by famous scientist Dr C.V Raman.

For a very long time Muslims had monopolised music. Why was this ? Music originated in Samaveda. So, Vaze asked the question to a Khansaheb. He said, “ Indian classical music originally belongs to Hindus, but during Muslim rule many Hindu singers voluntarily converted to Islam. I am myself descendent of one of them. It is not that Muslims are deeply interested in music, but Muslim rulers were interested, that is how we came forward. Hindus abandoned music. Therefore it may seem that Indian classical music is Muslim but that is not the case. It is definitely a heritage of Hindus.

 

3.4 Perseverance pays off for RAF ‘swastika’ squadron.

On 1 April 1997 John Young reported for The Times. He said,

“ An RAF squadron that played a crucial role in the defeat of the Japanese in the Second World War has achieved official recognision more than half century after it was disbanded. The Garter King of Arms has approved a new badge for the squadron association that will be dedicated at St Clement Danes, the RAF church in the Strand, on April 22.

The ceremony will mark the successful outcome of a long campaign by veterans and friends of 273 Squadron……

 

The squadron was formed in 1918 and then reformed in Ceylon in August 1939. It fought throughout the long and arduous campaign to recapture Burma in support of Allied ground troops. …..

 

Most squadrons were formed or reformed in Britain, where their badges were submitted for royal approval. Far from home, members of 273 squadron designed their own badge and sent it to the War Ministry in London for authorisation, only to be told nearly two years later that it was unacceptable.

 

The reason was thought to be that the design incorporated an ancient Asian peace symbol, the fylfot, which had been copied from the wall of a Buddhist temple near the squadron airfield in Ceylon. Unfortunately, the fylfot bore a close resemblance to the Nazi swastika. A resemblance, which the RAF high command evidently found too close for comfort.

 

The squadron, which was too busy fighting to put forward a different design, was disbanded early in 1946, never having served as a unit in Britain. The original 273 Squadron badge was displayed during the war but never received official approval.

 

On their return home its members were told that, since the squadron no longer existed, a badge could not be granted retrospectively. Consequently it could not be commemorated, along with other squadrons, on the floor of St Clement Danes or in the RAF museum in Hendon.

 

Last June, Nicholas Soames, the Armed Forces Minister, confirmed in Commons that the rule still applied. However, he added that a badge could be granted to an official squadron association.

 

An association was duly formed and has since been recognised by the Ministry of Defence as representing the interests of those who fought with the squadron in the war.

 

A final hitch occurred when it was found that there was no space between 272 and 274 squadrons on the church floor. Instead the new badge, without the fylfot and displaying the crown of the queen instead of George VI will have an honoured place next to that of No 1 Squadron, the oldest of them all.

 

3.5 Slavery : Time for truth

3.5.1 The U.N held a conference on Racism in Durban, South Africa in August / September. Israel and U.S withdrew and some interesting information came out in the open about slavery

Ann Leslie wrote for the Daily Mail on 30 August 2001

‘ Crimes against humanity ‘ are only crimes when committed by whites against blacks – not when they are committed by blacks against whites, or blacks against other blacks it seems.

 

Nor will anyone at the Durban conference concede the uncomfortable truth that African slavery was not a get-rich-quick idea invented by whites : Africans had been selling fellow Africans to each other since time immemorial.

 

Arab traders then cashed in on this already thriving trade, force-marching the purchased Africans across deserts for shipment to North Africa and the Middle East ( where many black males were castrated to work as guards in Arab harems).

 

Even 25 years ago in oil rich Dubai, I met black women descended from African slaves, who were not paid any regular wages and who, in private, were unembarrassedly referred to by their Arab owners as ‘slaves.’

 

Arab delegations – intent on attacking Israel’s ‘racist’ Zionist policies - will not, of course, permit any discussion of their own racism towards minorities, past or present. Although the Arab role in the enslavement of Africans long pre-dated ours, don’t expect any ‘ unreserved apologies ’ from them.

 

When the whites arrived in Africa with even larger money-bags than the Arabs, one African chief set out the deal : ‘ We want three things : powder, ball and brandy. And we have three things to sell : men, women and children.’

 

The Durban conference will not be examining the equally discomfiting truth that it was not the Africans who ended the slave trade, but European whites.

 

In 1772 slavery was abolished on British soil, and in 1833 outlawed throughout the British Empire.

 

Far from welcoming the end of this exploitation of the African peasantry, African tribal chiefs ( and Arab slavers ) were mighty annoyed about our meddling in what would now be called their ‘ cultural traditions.’ Delegations from West Africa arrived in London to express outrage at the colonists’ determination to end their age-old and lucrative enterprise.

 

So, if reparations are to be paid by former slave-owning white nations, then should they not also be paid by black African states whose original wealth was built upon the very ‘crime against humanity’ ?

 

3.5.2 Prof Linda Colley, of London School of Economics in her letter to the editor of The Guardian, said, “ … Even in 1700 two of the most formidable empires in the world were both Islamic – the Mughals in India and the Ottomans. And the world’s most durable empire, which still exists under another name, was not European, but China. Slaves could be found in all three, and in the Ottoman case whites were enslaved as well. None of this lets Europeans off the hook, or detracts from our duty to give more aid to struggling nations of Africa.”

 

“ But if we want to understand cross-cultural relations, we must get rid of the simplistic notion that in the past only whites had power and that all non-Europeans lacked it. The world was and is far more complicated “

 

3.5.3 Arabian slave trade

In his letter to the editor of Independent ( 9 September 2001 ) W R Haines wrote, “ Arabs in east Africa were responsible for more slavery and for longer than the West. Dr Livingstone estimated that 50,000 slaves used to be sold annually through the slave market in Zanzibar and that, for every slave sold, four died on the way to the coast. So some 250,000 were being removed from east Africa each year. Those that survived were shipped by dhow to Arabia, where they were traded along west/east sea routes. The Sultan of Muscat had “ and Zanzibar” as part of his title. It is not just the West that’s to blame for this human misery.

 

3.5.4 We came across an issue of Daily Mail of 15 November 1997. It carried a review by Paul Johnson of the book The Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas.

 

One of the most fascinating themes in Thomas’s book is his cataloguing of African complicity in the trade.

Despite popular belief, Europeans did not introduce slavery; they just latched on to an existing market.

For centuries before Europeans began shipping black people to the Americas in the 15th century, Africa had a thriving market in slaves. This does not make the Atlantic slave trade excusable but it explains how European traders operated with such ease.

 

Indeed, after prostitution, trading in slaves is the world’s oldest profession. Aristotle stated a universal truth: ‘Humanity is divided into two – the masters and the slaves.’

Two millennia later, in 1842, the sultan of Morocco told the abolitionist British consul : ‘ The traffic in slaves is a matter on which all sects and nations have agreed from the time of the sons of Adam.’

 

But the slave trade to the Americas, which lasted from the 15th to the 19th centuries was something different, it can be cited as the greatest act of human depravity in history, worse than the Holocaust, worse than Gulag.

 

Two great and supposedly saintly men – King Ferdinand V, known as Ferdinand the Catholic, and the Emperor Charles V, who retired to the monastery he built for himself at the Scoria, near Madrid – gave permission early in the 16th century for 4000 Africans, ‘ the best and strongest slaves available’ to be shipped across the Atlantic. They were the original villains. But they were not the only ones

 

Africans were chosen because they worked harder, longer and more willingly than whites or Indians. And this fact had been known for centuries to sharp Arab traders, who engaged in slaving on a prodigious scale long before Columbus crossed the Atlantic.

The Arabs continued to transport Africans in scores of thousands to North Africa, the Mediterranean and the Middle East. In 1700, the Moroccan sultan Mulai Ismael had a black slave army of 180,000 men. It has been calculated that just as many went to Egypt.

The Arabs were the great internal slavers in Africa. But the local black kings enslaved Africans in the first place. Thomas reports that few Africans were kidnapped by white slavers.

 

Virtulayy all were sold, quite legally, by black kings and by black or Arab traders. The largest single category were prisoners, taken in endemic local African wars, which were waged for hundreds of years before the transatlantic slave trade began

 

In the 1850s, Sigissmund Koelle, an expert in African languages, made a detailed survey, which showed that 34 percent of slaves were war prisoners. 30 pc had been kidnapped by Africans, 11 pc had been condemned to slavery in law courts, 7 pc had been sold to pay debts and 7 pc had been sold by families or friends.

 

In the 1820s The African potentate Eyo Honsety II of Creek Town said that when a king succeeded to the throne, he would sell off his predecessor’s hundreds of wives as slaves. Sometimes, kings sold their own wives. In 1695, it was reported that ‘ often when ships are in a great strait for slaves and cannot be supplied otherwise, the King of Whydah will sell his 300 or 400 wives to complete their number.

About 11 million Africans survived the journey across the Atlantic. The Portuguese were the biggest slavers for longest, taking 4,650,000 in 30,000 voyages. Then came the British, who shipped 2,600,000 in 12,000 voyages.

The success of the British did not mean they were crueller than the Spanish, French, Dutch, Danes and Americans, who also took part in large-scale slave trading, merely that they won more wars and were more efficient.

 

In 1750 William Chancellor. A ship’s surgeon on the slaver Wolf, wrote that the trade was a way of redeeming an unhappy people from inconceivable misery. This was a common view and it is not surprising that the Quakers were successful slavers.

 

In France, successful slavers were ennobled. Thomas quotes a patent of Louis XV raising to the nobility a Bordeaux slaver who ‘ is distinguished by his zeal’ by the extent of his operations and by the commerce of the slave trade.

 

Many Catholic and Protestant clergy approved of slavery as means of converting Africans who would otherwise remain pagan. This argument ignored the fact that in some U.S states it was a criminal offence to teach religion to slaves.

 

And all the defences of slavery overlooked the horror of the ‘middle passage’. More than 13 million slaves left African ports. Only 11,328,000 were landed in Americas. So 1,75 million perished at sea and were thrown overboard.

 

Britain began large-scale slaving after the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 ended the War of Spanish Succession.

Queen Anne boasted to parliament : ‘ I have insisted and obtained that the contract for furnishing the Spanish West Indies with Negroes shall be made with us for 30 years. This contract was sold out to South Sea Company and led to the famous ‘Bubble’ in 1720, the first stock exchange crash in Britain. Sir Isaac Newton, who hoped to make a fortune out of slaving, lost 20,000 pounds ( worth of 10 million pounds today ). On the other hand, Thomas Guy, who sold out in time, became a millionaire and founded Guy’s Hospital, a world famous institution built on the profits of the slave trade.

 

Dr Johnson’s angry question was “ How is it that the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of Negroes ? “ Four out of America’s first five Presidents owned, bought and sold slaves.

 

To its eternal credit, Britain took the lead in campaigning against the slave trade. A key milestone was the conversion of the Quakers

 

So what about the issue of compensation ? ….. The most active agents in the slave trade were the petty kings of Africa and those who served them. In 1840, King Gezo of Dagomey told the U S Navy : ‘ The slave trade has been the ruling principle of my people. It is the source of their glory and wealth.’ The successor states of their Kingdoms are the 50 or so independent countries of Africa. Should they pay up ?

 

3.6 Hindusthan – the holy land for Arabs

Pandit Mahadevshastri Joshi of Pune compiled Bharatiya Sanskritikosh or Encyclopaedia of civilisation of Bharat. On page 215 we find

Arabs and Bharat

Traditionally Arabs believe that Hazrat Adam descended from heaven to land in Hindusthan and from there he travelled to Arabia. Therefore Arabs regard Bharat as their holy land ( pitrubhumi )

Ref :- Arab aur Bharatake Sambandha by Sayyad Suleiman Nadavi, year 1930

 

We have asked our friends in Pune to investigate further

 

 

4 HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN AMERICA

On 21 June 2000 Andrew Gumbel reported from Los Angeles for the Independent. He writes 

US is accused of exploiting Latino children on farms

A leading human rights group accused the United States yesterday of violating international standards on child labour by allowing minors - the vast majority Latinos - to work gruelling hours in the fields at the expense of their education, health and other basic labour standards.

 

Human Rights Watch said hundreds of thousands of minors across the country were working days of 14 hours or more, often for much less than the legal minimum wage, and that they were being exposed to highly toxic pesticides and running a serious risk of illness and injury from heavy equipment and sharp instruments.

" In the fields, the U.S is like a developing country," said Lee Tucker, the author of the report Fingers to the Bone : United State's failure to Protect Child Farm workers.

 

Under the 1938 Fair Labour Standards Act, agricultural workers are exempt from the age restrictions that apply to almost every other sector of the economy. Although American politicians have lobbied in support of a far-reaching international treaty to outlaw abuses of child labour, the US is not in compliance with the treaty, Human Rights Watch alleged.

 

" A12-year old kid can work unlimited hours on a farm but isn't allowed to work in a fast-food restaurant," Ms Tucker said. " There is no good reason to have such a double standard."

 

Children were routinely exposed to pesticides, sometimes working in fields still wet with poison, and often given no access to water to wash their hands or avert dehydration. The risk of injury from knives, heavy equipment or falls from ladders was exacerbated by the long hours; sleep deprivation and a relatively high incidence of depression

 

 

 

 

5. AMERICAN ELECTIONS

 

George W Bush has finally sworn in as the 43rd President of USA. What should we note?

 

(i) American Democracy

Out of a population of over 200 million people on 100 million or roughly 50% voted and the votes were equally divided between Bush and Gore. Thus the winner was supported by only 25% of population. 75% of population did not give him their support.

 

Gore got 49,859,736 votes

Bush got 49,642,200 votes.

Thus the one who got less votes was the winner!! 

 

(ii) After the outcry over the counting of votes in Florida, an important question arose. If the counting dispute was not sorted out in time then what ? 

Sunday Times reported on 19 November 2000, “ If the dispute is not resolved by January 2001 when Clinton leaves office, Dennis Hastert, the Speaker of the House of Representatives could be appointed president until the Florida deadlock is resolved.”

“Should he prefer not to relinquish his post, the job might fall to the most senior senator, Strom Thurmond, the 98 year old Republican from North Carolina.”

“ Should that shock prove too much, next in succession would be Madeleine Albright, the secretary of state. SHE HOWEVER, IS DISQUALIFIED BECAUSE SHE WAS NOT BORN IN AMERICA. …..”

[ But you propose that in India too, only those born in India can become the President, the Vice President and the Prime Minister the Americans would denounce you a Hindu Fundamentalist!! ]

 

(iii) It was ultimately the U.S Supreme court that decided the fates of Bush and his opponent Gore. And who appointed the Supreme Court judges ? The American presidents. These are flagrantly political appointments. Out of the 9 judges 7 were appointed by Republican presidents. And that is democracy!

 

 

(iii) Hillary Clinton wife of President Bill Clinton, got elected as a Senator from Chicago. After her victory she said, “ Yesterday we voted as Democrats and Republicans. Tomorrow we work as New Yorkers.”

[ why can’t the Indian politicians show the same attitude ? ]

 

 

6. Religion and Politics in America

On 30 January 2001Toby Harnden reported from Washington for The Daily Telegraph. He said, “ Bush puts religious-based organisations at centre of policy.”

Religion is being brought back to the centre of American government by President Bush, who cites his Christianity as underpinning his own brand of ‘compassionate conservatism.’

Announcing that religious and community organisations would be eligible for billions of dollars in government funding yesterday, Mr Bush gathered 35 Roman Catholic, Protestant, Jewish Muslim and secular leaders at the white House. ( what happened to the Hindus ? were they invited ? we do not think so. It is not in our blood even to protest at such treatment )

“ They were all people, he said, who had ‘heard the universal call to love a neighbour like they’d like to be loved themselves. ( Has nobody told him that Muslims call Hindus as Kafirs and have no neighbourly love for them. We think not we Hindus still believe in Sarva Dharma Samabhava ) who exist and work hard, not out of the love of their fellow human beings.”

Mr Bush said a White House office would be established to distribute the money to groups that dealt each day with the ‘deep needs and real suffering in the shadow of America’s affluence’ including problems of addiction gang violence and homelessness.

It would be called the White House Office of Faith-based and Community Initiatives and beheaded by Scott Goldsmith, a Jew and former mayor of Indianapolis, would act as presidential adviser.

Although Mr Bush was careful to say he would not fund the religious activities of any group, his initiative provoked criticism from some on the Left who said it violated the constitutional separation of church and state. In the early days of his presidency, Mr Bush has made it clear that his personal religious faith is almost inseparable from his political philosophy. His inauguration speech contained several biblical references and his education plan unveiled last week allows parents to use government money to send children to religious schools.

“ He believes faith is a powerful tool to change lives.” Said Scott McClellan, a White House spokesman. Some critics said Mr Bush was foisting religion on Americans without any proof that it could do a better job than government. Others feared that he could be planning to cut by curtailing government initiatives. Steve Benen , of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said a legal challenge might be mounted. “ It’s a misguided public policy and from a constitutional perspective it’s a nightmare.”  he added.

But Mr Bush’s advisers have calculated that his proposals will find favour with a majority of Americans and draw support in Congress.

Survey show that around half of Americans go to church at least twice a month. Senator Joe Lieberman, an orthodox Jew who ran for vice-president, has frequently spoken of the need for the government to promote faith-based groups.

Mr Bush renewed his commitment to Christianity at about the age of 40 with the help of Billy Graham, the evangelical preacher ( In the 1960s Mr Graham openly stated, ‘unless you come to the feet of Christ you will not get

salvation’ ) and gave up drinking. A Methodist, he reads the Bible every day and attends church at least once a week.

His belief in the value of faith-based organisations grew from discussions with Marvin Olasky, one of the first proponents of ‘Compassionate conservatism.’

Mr Bush hopes that his support for faith-based initiatives will help him to build bridges with black voters, only nine per cent of whom voted for him in November’s elections.

Our Comments :- As always Hindus will be the losers. Hindu religion is not mentioned even once in this article.

7 SOME IMPORTANT NOTES RELATING TO GANDHI MURDER TRIAL 

( continued from newsletter 35   )

28. Why was Gopal Godse finally released ?

Gopal Godse, younger brother of Nathuram Godse who shot Gandhi dead was sent to jail after the trial. When questions were being asked about his date of release Government of India and Government of Bombay province

( which became Government of Maharashtra in May 1960 ) kept on saying,

 “ Gopal Godse’s release it is entirely at our discretion. We may detain him as long as we like. “

 

Gopal Godse made several appeals. These were all rejected by the Supreme Court of India. Eventually a hearing was due to take place at the Supreme Court at New Delhi on 19 October 1964. And Godse was released from prison on 13 October, six days earlier. WHY ? Why was Government of India so anxious to release Gopal Godse before the hearing ? Let us see.

 

Gopal Godse was sentenced to Transportation for Life by the Special Judge Atma Charan. High Court at Simla confirmed that sentence. What is transportation ?

Savarkar was transported to Andaman Islands 1000 miles from Chennai

( Madras ), Tilak was transported to Mandalay in Burma involving a travel of more than 3,000 miles. Gopal Godse should have been transported in a similar manner but in reality Gopal Godse was not transported to anywhere.

He was kept in jail in Ambala and then Nasik where he stayed for most number of years. He was transferred to Aurangabad jail in January 1962. He was sent to Delhi jail on 23 September 1964 so that he could appear before the Supreme Court for a hearing. Gopal Godse argued his case in court on 28 September. The date for full hearing was set on 19 October. Government of India had to send its lawyers at that hearing.

 

10 October 1964 was a Saturday. Gulzarilal Nanda the Home Minister of Government of India visited Delhi jail and met Gopal Godse. On 13 October he was released. Why ?? What was the Government of India afraid of ?

 

Gopal Godse was sentenced to transportation for life. As he was not transported to anywhere his sentenced should have been commuted to a life sentence of 14 years ( maximum ) under section 402 of the Indian Criminal Procedure Code and also  section section 55 of the Indian Penal Code. This the Government of India had failed to do. So, instead of facing a humiliating hearing in the Supreme Court, the GOI decided to release Gopal Godse immediately, not because the Congress leaders had a change of heart or felt any sympathy for Gopal Godse. The order of release was made under section 401 of the Indian Criminal Procedures Code. This section deals with powers of the Government to show clemency. What a travesty of justice!! Godse was in jail for more than 16 years. He was entitled to various remissions for example on the occasion of India becoming a Republic on 26 January 1950, for good behaviour, for donating blood. He should have been released before 1962 under due process of law.

 

 

8. BEHAVIOUR OF CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS TODAY

8.1 THE CHRISTIANS

 

8.1.2 CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISM IN AMERICA: THE OMINOUS SIGNS

In our previous newsletter we drew readers' attention to rising tide of Christian Fundamentalism in America. These fanatics want to ban teaching Darwin's theory of evolution.

New Scientist, the monthly magazine gave full details in its issue of 22 April 2000. It contains a "Special Report" entitled Burning Darwin. It states, " From Kansas to Korea, creationalism is flooding the Earth. Start worrying now.

Shree Godbole has a copy of this issue 

 

NOTE :- Why should Hindus be concerned ?

The dangers are far reaching. This right wing fanaticism is spreading in America. And these fanatics eventually will force the Indian Government to facilitate easy spread of Christianity in India.

The Daily Telegraph of 15 February reported ‘Darwin back in school’ We must maintain our vigil.

 

Has the U.S ever engaged in germs warfare ?

The answer is yes. U.S effectively used germ warfare on its indigenous population.

In a treaty made between the Ihanktonwan ( People of Village ), a band of the Lakota ( Sinoux ) People in 1858, U.S President James Buchanan retained the option of reducing annuity payments or suspending them entirely if the Ihanktonwan population happened to decrease.

It’s believed that a decrease was engineered by the President’s agents distributing blankets infected by with smallpox virus, and by stealing treaty goods intended for the native peoples.

Smallpox began decimating native communities from as early as 1514, when it was introduced into Panama. Subsequent epidemics continued throughout the 19th century.

Disease was an overwhelming and governing factor for the estimated 90per cent drop in native populations between 1492 and 1900.

Smallpox, but cholera, measles, whooping cough, mumps, tuberculosis, scarlet fever and influenza took a greater toll than warfare or starvation.

( Ref :- Daily Mail of 8 August 2001, p53 / Coffee Break )

 

 

8.2 THE MUSLIMS 

 

8.2.1 MUSLIM LIBERALS MUST SPEAK OUT

On 1 November 2000 The Daily Telegraph published a letter by one Charles Allen of Taunton, Somerset. He says, " The calls by Lady Uddin and Lord Ahmed for Salman Rushdie's police protection to be lifted ( report Oct 30 ) would carry much more weight if they and other prominent members of Britain's Muslim community publicly condemned not simply the 'fatwa' imposed on Rushdie, but the notion that he merits the threats made against him.

Islam places high value on virtue  ( maruf) and moral citizenship (salah) but the good Muslim is " one who submits" to the divine truth. He must follow the Five Pillars of Islam and the Six Pillars of Faith. He has a religious duty as a mujahid or "striver" to spread Islam through conversion of unbelievers and the extermination unbelief. This striving is often called the Sixth Pillar of Islam, jihad, usually interpreted as "holy war against unbelievers."

And this is where the trouble starts. The Prophet Mohammed called for the words of God as transmitted to him and set down in the Koran to be taken at face value. The Koran (not unlike the Old Testament) contains many passages calling for the extermination of Kafirs (deniers) and those who commit the sin of blasphemy by rejecting conversion.

The so-called Verses of the Sword exhorts Muslims to " seek out, ambush, besiege, seize and slay unbelievers wherever they may be found, unless they are converted to Islam." Violence against unbelievers and blsaphemers is also sanctioned by the example of the Prophet himself.

How then is the good Muslim to live at peace with his kafir neighbour without losing the true spirit of 'jihad' or betraying his faith ? ........

Until Muslim liberals here and abroad have the courage to speak out publicly against this fundamentalist view of Islam and show that an acceptable alternative exists, we must afford Rushdie the protection to which he is entitled as a British subject.    

 

8.2.2 SAUDI JUSTICE

On 12 May 2000 The Independent carried a letter by Mr Roger Smith of Amnesty International. He wrote

Rupert Cornwall writes that if Saudi Arabia's ruling dynasty is to bring in reform, now is surely the moment (report, 9 May). This should be more than economic reform.

Now is unquestionably the time for urgent reform for those who are in prison without charge, facing a punishment that may include amputation, flogging or death: who have had no opportunity to defend themselves or to be defended; who may not know what charges have been brought against them; and whose first realisation that they are to be executed is when they are brought to the place of execution on a Friday morning.

Saudi Arabia operates a justice system without justice.

When will Saudi Arabia be ready to talk about guaranteeing human rights for its 19 million inhabitants ? This week Prince Turki bin Saud of the Saudi Arabian foreign ministry claimed that the country's recent election to 53-member UN Human Rights Commission in Geneva ' vindicates it of all accusations' concerning human rights abuses, but this week Amnesty International publishes new report laying bare the abuses that continue unchecked in the kingdom.

 

8.2.3 Destruction of Buddha statues in Afghanistan

On 13 March 2001 Robert Fisk reported for The Independent. He says

The Taliban, the Buddhas and the Saudi connection.

The destruction of the great Buddhist statues in Afghanistan by the Taliban militia was as predictable as it was culpable; Saudi Arabia bears ultimate responsibility for this appalling annihilation of the world’s heritage.

For it was Saudi Arabia’s rigid Sunni Wahabi sect that created the Taliban, and it was Saudi Muslim legal iconoclasm that led directly to the wrecking of the Buddhas.

The ruin of the massive statues in Bamiyan has tell-tale origins in Saudi Arabia. Back in 1820, the much-worshipped statues of Dhu Khalasa, dating from the 12th century, were destroyed by Wahabis.

And 10 years ago, only weeks after the Lebanese professor Kemal Salibi wrote a book suggesting that Jewish villages in what is now Saudi Arabia may have constituted the location of the Bible, the Saudi Sunni authorities sent bulldozers to destroy the ancient buildings in these hamlets.

Saudi organisations have bulldozed hundreds of historic buildings in the name of religion in Mecca and Medina, and former United Nations officials have condemned the destruction of Ottoman-style buildings in Bosnia by a Saudi aid agency that decided they were “ idolatrous. “

When the Saudi Sunnis built the massive Faisal mosque in the Pakistani capital Islamabad – originally destined for the Afghan capital of Kabul its construction was followed almost at once by the smashing of a large number of early Islamic figure shrines in the city. Graffiti appeared beside graveyard shrines saying that they must be destroyed and that ‘ there can be no sainthood in Islam.

There is, in fact, nothing “ Islamic “ in the desecration of the Bamiyan statues. For 1,400 years, as the writer Emran Qureshi has noted, pious Muslims managed to coexist with pagan statuary – from the Spinx in Egypt to the statues of Iranian Persepolis and the Buddhas of Bamiyan. The latter had survived centuries of Islamic rule with little damage The Taliban’s decision to destroy the statues has been at odds with Afghanistan’s more tolerant traditions.

In Saudi Arabia, private Christian worship, even at Christmas is illegal. Christians caught saying communal prayers have been deported. Its kings are buried without even a gravestone.

But, no American “demarches “ have been made to the oil rich princes whose alliance with the United States is so important and whose dominating Wahabi sect condemned the Bamiyan statues.

 

8.2.4 Fantasy of Islamic brotherhood

Our Muslim friends are never tired of telling us that the whole Islamic world is one. You hurt one Muslim and you will face the wrath of whole of Islamic world. Is this true ? Let us see :-

Zahid Mubarek, 19, was sentenced to 90 days in Feltham young offenders’ institution for shoplifting 6 pounds worth of razor blades and interfering with a motor vehicle.

Tragically, five hours before he was due to be released, while his family were preparing a welcome home celebration, Zahid was beaten to death with a wooden table leg by his cell mate, Robert Stewart, 20, a racist psychopath with a history of violence who was on remand for sending malicious communications. ( The Guardian 2 November 2000, p21)

But what happened to the Islamic brotherhood ? Any demonstrations in

Syria ? No. Libya? No. Saudi Arabia ? No. The truth is that Arabs despise Muslims from Indian continent ( they may call themselves Pakistanis or Bangladeshis, but for the Arab world they are Indians) and could care less if thousands were killed by Neo Nazis.

 

Take another example. On 7 June 2001 it was reported in Metro, ‘ An Asian man was badly beaten by skinheads in a new instance of racial violence in Oldham. Mohammed Asif Kayani was attacked as he returned home from work on Tuesday. The 34 year old labourer was beaten about the head and knocked unconscious. He was treated at the Royal Oldham Hospital for a broken jaw and nose and cuts to his face. His wife said her husband’s injuries were so severe he had difficulty in communicating.

Did this case arouse any feeling of resentment in the Islamic world? Absolutely not.

 

How many more examples do we need ?

 

It is time we learnt the truth and convince fellow Muslims of the same.

 

9 WHY WE CANNOT SPEAK THE TRUTH

Too frightened to blow the whistle.

The Daily Telegraph of 10 December 1999 carried an important letter by Father Luke Millar of London. He says, " Last year I was a visitor at the bedside of a patient who was being starved to death, and whose only water came when an Irish Catholic nurse was on duty. His family, some of whom had worked in the very same hospital, were too scared to make any complaint for fear of receiving similar treatment if they should be admitted there.

 

That fear of theirs, that the system can be so vindictive as to wreak revenge on whistle-blowers, was even more terrifying to me than the realisation that involuntary euthanasia is common practice in hospitals.

 

I was a coward and did not create a fuss. But, kneeling there, I said a prayer. Perhaps, as your current campaign leads to a change of attitude and a greater hospital care, that coward's prayer is being answered.

 

 

10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

We are grateful to the following for their help :-

 

* For making copies of our newsletters and distributing them to friends

Dina Nath Behl of London, Dr Godbole of Rochdale.

 

* For making copies of our newsletters and sending them to friends in Pune and America

An anonymous friend from Pune

 

* For studying and making suggestions of improvement in our writing

Pandit Ramkrishnayya of London.

 

* For continuing with slide shows of Godbole's special tour of London.

Dr Agarkar, of Kalyan, Maharashtra.

 

 

** Please help by :-

 

* acknowledging the receipt of this newsletter to the following address :-

 

Mr V S Godbole

14 Turnberry Walk

Bedford

MK41, 8AZ

U.K

 

E Mail v.godbole3@ntlworld.com

 

Telephone Number 01234 - 357388

 

* sending money to Mr Godbole (in pound sterling or Indian rupees )

* making five copies of this newsletter and sending them to your friends.

* circulating this newsletter among your friends.

* trying to get parts of this newsletter published in various newspapers,

  magazines and periodicals.

* arranging slide shows by Godbole at various social functions

* purchasing books from Mr Godbole.

 

 

VANDE MATARAM