INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INTO TRUE HISTORY

 

NEWSLETTER NO. 41 OF 16 FEBRUARY 2004

 

1. NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS

 

1.1 Rationalism of Veer Savarkar (in English)

At long last the book will be published on the auspicious day of Gudi Padwa (21 March 2004) at Thane, Maharashtra.

Copies will be available in Hindusthan, England and America.

Back page of the book is as follows -

 

Rationalism of Veer Savarkar

 

Vinayak Damodar SAVARKAR, popularly known as Veer Savarkar was the unsung hero of the Indian freedom struggle against the British rule (1906-47). He made an outstanding contribution to this great cause. Leaders like Gandhi, Nehru and Bose adopted Savarkar’s main philosophies, but many years later. At the time of the Indian independence in 1947, many prominent leaders of the Congress Party, including its President, were members of Savarkar’s secret revolutionary society called The Abhinav Bharat. He was the main source of their inspiration and, yet, was never given any credit for this.

 

Savarkar suffered terribly for 27 years at the hands of the English rulers. He spent 10 ½ years of hard labour in jail in Andaman Islands, 1,000 miles off east coast of India, followed by further 3 years in various jails in India and then 13 ½ years in internment there. Despite having suffered this appalling persecution, Savarkar had the greatness to proclaim, “ I never hated the English just because they were English.” He sincerely believed in the universal brotherhood of man.

 

In prison, Savarkar faced religious fanaticism from Muslims too. Although he was then in a helpless condition, he fought against their tyranny and defeated them and won their respect. Yet he said in 1927, “ I never hated Muslims nor even despised them.” He was a Humanist

 

During his internment of 13 ½ years, Savarkar was forced to live in a remote place called Ratnagiri and could move within the district but was forbidden to take part in politics. Undaunted by this, he concentrated on the task of social reforms and had to fight against the entrenched attitudes of orthodox people. By 1933, with his sheer resourcefulness he managed to achieve four incredible social changes in Ratnagiri.

* Removal of the practice of untouchability.

* Dining together by Hindus of ALL castes, including untouchables.

* Opening up of a new temple for ALL Hindus including untouchables.

* Running of a Café open to ALL Hindus including untouchables.

 

After his release from the internment in 1937, Savarkar fearlessly opposed Gandhi’s policy of perpetual capitulation to Muslim demands as it was clearly proving to be disastrous to the nation. For this reason, Savarkar was much misunderstood and maligned which continues to be so even today. But unlike many public figures of his times, he did not abandon his principles to suit the public mood.

 

Savarkar was above all a Rationalist and this aspect of his life has largely remained unknown to the public. This book is, therefore, designed to enlighten the readers of this vital part of his character. It is also a valuable guide for the rejuvenation of the Hindu Nation.

 

 

VANDE MATARAM

 

We are extremely grateful for Dr Agarkar for his valuable help in making the final corrections at printers in Pune

 

 

1.2 One Law for the rich, one for the poor

On 10 August 2001 the Daily Mail reported

Reprieved by NHS: Violent doctor is spared jail after judge says that he’s more use in a hospital

A hospital doctor who broke a Tube worker’s nose after his train was delayed was spared jail yesterday – after a judge said the Health Service needed him more. But Dr John Nelson will still have to pay out nearly £9,000 over the incident in which he struck out because he feared the hold-up would mean him missing his plane to Spain.

The 37-year-old anaesthetist headbutted Alan Deabill as he and his colleague tried to restrain him after Nelson had slapped another Underground worker.

A jury at Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court found him guilty of assault causing actual bodily harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years.

But Judge Duncan Matheson said that after a ‘great deal of anxious thought’ he would not jail him.

‘At the end of the day, the conclusion I’ve come to is it’s not in the public interest I should deprive the NHS and the hospital where you work and your patients of your skills and services as I surely would be doing if I sent you to prison. ‘You are a doctor and have a specialism as a qualified anaesthetist and have received a lengthy training, both as a doctor and as a specialist in anaesthetics.

‘I recognise you are an expensive commodity, and a resource to the NHS, a resource which is not exactly in abundant supply.’

Nelson, who worked at Charing Cross Hospital in London, was fined £1,000 (£750 for the assault on Mr Deabill and £250 for the assault on Mr Lardner) and told to pay £1,500 in compensation for attacking Mr Deabill and another worker, Steven Lardner, in June last year at Kennington station, South London.

He must also pay prosecution and defence costs totalling £6,300.

 

Judge told him,” There is a very strong case for saying this sort of offence should have an immediate custodial sentence even for somebody with a good character. You’ve done a lot of damage to your reputation, professional and private, and the scars will remain.”

He added, “ There isn’t one rule for professional people and the affluent, and another for those who don’t have advantages. In one sense, with your education and professional qualification it’s almost more serious because you should have known better.”

“Equally I’ve to make sure, if I don’t send you to prison, it’s not a case of you being able to buy your way out of prison because you happen to have money to pay compensation and costs.”

 

The incident happened as Nelson was trying to get to Luton Airport to catch a flight. Infuriated by a delay he had stepped from the train to find out what was holding it up. When station attendant Mr Lardner told him to ask the driver, whose carriage was out of sight in the tunnel, he started to hurl abuse at him and then slapped him. He then stalked out of the station, pursued by Mr Lardner, Mr Deabill, and another colleague. There was a struggle in which he headbutted Mr Deabill and kicked Mr Lardner’s shins.

The three men took Nelson back into the station, where he tried to get away on another train but was kept on a platform until police arrived. Mr Deabill was taken to hospital where an X-ray revealed a broken nose.

 

Peter Rowlands, defending said the men had used considerable force to restrain Nelson, who suffered extensive bruising. Nelson, of Clapham, South London, admitted common assault on Mr Lardner but denied the charge of assaulting Mr Deabill.

He now faces investigation by the General Medical Council and could be struck off.

 

This is how the British justice system works in 2001, just imagine what it would have been like in 1901!

 

 

2. AROUND LONDON TOUR OF PLACES ASSOCIATED WITH INDIAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS

No further tours were carried out

 

3. History today

3.1 Racism in Eastern Europe

We Hindus always feel sympathy for East Europeans as they were suppressed for so long by the Soviet Union. But after winning their freedom, they have proved to be just as racists as other Europeans. Let us look at recent experience of Black football players

 

Some recent events

* On 4 October 2002, Darren Lewis reported for the Daily Mirror

Bent Defies Race Yobs

Striker Marcus Bent was racially taunted and spat at by Sartid fans as Ipswich battled through to the second round of the UEFA Cup in Yugoslavia yesterday.

Bent who scored the game’s only goal from a penalty after nine minutes, said, “ There was a lot of racist abuse, a lot of spitting when you went near the crowd. You could hear them doing monkey chants.

But the boys dealt with it, I dealt with it, and all that really matters is we came away with a win.” Former Champions League winner Finidi George, who played all over Europe with Ajax, Real Betis and Real Mallorea, said, “ I could hear them all the time. It was not pleasant. They’re quite backward in their thinking and something should be done.”

Similar incidents involving players from Arsenal, Liverpool and Fulham in recent weeks has forced UEFA into promising harsh punishments for clubs whose supporter use racist chants.

 

 

** On 14 October 2002 Ken Dyer reported for the Evening Standard.

Cole: Even stadium medics were racist

Ashley Cole today revealed that the racist abuse was so widespread during England’s match in Bratislava that even the stretcher-bearers were joining in.

European football officials UEFA could close down the stadium in the Slovakian capital and order the team to play away home following an investigation into the abuse which both Arsenal defender and England team-mate Emile Heskey (England striker) described as the worst they had ever experienced

 

Cole said, “ It has to be stopped. I don’t like to see the country or the team suffer, but something has got to be done. It hardly happens in England any more but when I play in Europe, it still goes on. Emile seemed to bear the brunt in Bratislava but I had my share as well. It was all over the stadium and when I went to pick up the ball up a couple of times, even the stretcher staff were making monkey chants.”

Heskey said, “You could hear the abuse. It was very loud, especially in the second half. Police were around but they seemed to do nothing about it, so what can you do?”

“ A lot was said in the dressing room and the players could not believe it. At club level we never get that. Playing in Europe we get bits but that was some of the worst stuff we have been subjected to.”

 

On 15 October 2002 Mike Davies reported for the London based paper Metro. He said, “ Heskey : Time to ban the racists”

Emile Heskey has urged UEFA to act over the racist chanting, which marred England’s opening Euro 2004 qualifying tie against Slovakia. Heskey and Ashley Cole were the subject of racial abuse throughout the game in Bratislava on Saturday. And the Liverpool striker believes European football’s governing body must act strongly – including banning Slovakia supporters travelling to the return match next summer.”

“Yes, I would support a ban. UEFA has to do something,” Heskey said.

 “You feel hurt they are looking at your colour, not you as a person.

He added, “ I wouldn’t travel abroad as an English fan. I’d go to the home matches, but I’d rather keep it at that because of fans in other countries.”

Last night, sources within UEFA said a ban on Slovakia fans travelling to England was unlikely. Such action could only be taken if there was a serious risk of violence between rival supporters. However, referee Domenieo Messina referred to the abuse in his match report and UEFA will be under pressure to take firm action.

Last week, PSV Eindhoven (a Dutch team) were fined just £9,500 after their supporters abused Arsenal’s Thierry Henry during a Champion League match.

Football Association director of communications Paul Newman said :’The penalties that are imposed is the key to all this now. UEFA’s disciplinary body has to decide what’s appropriate. It wasn’t one or two people, it was the whole stadium and that’s not acceptable.’

Newman also revealed Heskey and Cole will receive written apologies from the Slovakian Football Association over their treatment.

 

On 16 October 2002 Charlie Whelan wrote for the Evening Standard

UEFA’s shame for not tackling racists

“ …. what we need here is solidarity, not factionalism. If the players are indeed to mount their own action, then they should do so together – black and white walking off as one.

And since both the clubs and football authorities have been so slow to tackle this problem – Arsenal, who fielded nine black players against PSV, did not even officially lodge a complaint about the incident – it may come down to player solidarity. With no one on the pitch, there is no one to racially abuse, and UEFA would be shamed into taking action.

The Football Association also have some hard thinking to do. They must make it clear that England are not prepared to play in places where there is a record of racist abuse and that may even mean not participating in the European Championships.

Ridding the game of racism is much more important than short-term glory.

Mind you, the racist chanting did not seem to bother the television commentators who, like their colleagues from years gone by, ignored it on Saturday.

Thank God for Alan Green, of Radio Five Live, who constantly made it clear what was happening and condemning it throughout the match.”

 

 

3.2 How history gets falsified today

3.2.1 Nathuram Godse

Nathuram Godse shot and killed Gandhi on 30 January 1948. He never denied that and went to the gallows for it. Unfortunately his side of the story was never allowed to be told by the Governments of Congress Party. Over last 2 to 3 years a drama named Mee Nathuram Bolatoya (This is Nathuram speaking) has appeared on Marathi stage. The shows are very popular. A well-wisher recently sent an audio cassette to Godbole who was surprised by the falsification carried out by the producer. Here are the main points -

(1) There is depiction of a Muslim Inspector named Shaikh. His daughter is pregnant and seeks salvation of Nathuram.

There are many books on last chapter of Gandhi. One does not find an Inspector named Shaikh in any of the books.

 

(2) Nathuram meets Sindhu Godse, wife of his co-accused brother Gopal.

Sindhu says to Nathuram that Congress Party government closed their contracts with her company, one by one. This is fiction. Sindhu had no business when Nathuram went to the gallows. She started her business of Structural Steel Fabrication, some 2 years afterwards.

 

(3) At above meeting Nathuram says to Sindhu, “ Don’t live on charity.”

This is absurd. Things were extremely bad for Brahmins in Maharashtra after Gandhi’s assassination. Hundreds were thrown out of Government employment for writing articles criticising Gandhi’s policies of constant capitulation to Muslims. New graduates were literally begging for work. Against this background, Nathuram’s remarks would have been absurd. He never made them.

 

(4) Nathuram tells Sindhu that it is against his principles to request Government of India that he should be sent to gallows in Pune instead of Ambala, so that he could meet his parents before leaving this world. They were too old to travel.

Again, this is false. Nathuram did make such a request because his parents were old and could not stand the strain of travelling to Ambala. But the Iron Man, Sardar Patel refused the request of a dying man.

 

(5) There is scene of meeting in Ambala jail between Nathuram and Gandhi’s son Ramdas. It is childish to suggest that Nathuram could have ordered coffee for his guest Ramdas.

Moreover, such a meeting NEVER took place. True, there was correspondence between the two. However, when Nathuram asked Ramdas to convince him that he was wrong during a meeting, Ramdas chickened out. Why? Because Nathuram in his letter of 3 June 1949 said, “ You can argue emotionally or logically and try to convince me that what I did was wrong. Or may be that I will convince you that I was right all along.” Ramdas being Gandhi’s son, never wanted to take chances. He never met Nathuram.

 

(6) The producer fails to emphasise that it was not the partition of India that led to Gandhi’s assassination. Partition took place in August 1947. Gandhi was killed in January 1948, full five months after. Even government prosecution did not suggest that Nathuram wanted to kill Gandhi ever since partition. It was sickening attitude of Gandhi towards Hindu Muslim relations after partition that led to his assassination.

Note – the cassette was made by Anand Rangbhoomi of Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra.

 

3.2.2 Savarkar

In August 2002 Godbole obtained a copy of a cassette on Veer Savarkar by Prof Ram Shewalkar and was surprised by the narration. Her are just a few points –

* Shewalkar says that Savarkar wrote his autobiography. This is wrong. He started writing it in 1949, but it only covered his childhood and education. He never found time to complete his autobiography.

 

* Shewalkar says that in 1939 Savarkar proposed Indo British Commonwealth to Churchill, and people ridiculed him for it. Again, this is wrong. After breaking out of the first World War in 1914 Savarkar made some proposals to Mr Montague the then Secretary of State for India and in it he did propose the idea of British Commonwealth. In 1927, British Empire did become British Commonwealth.

Moreover, Churchill was not in power in 1939.

 

* Imparting of Military training to Hindu Youth,

Prof Shewalkar does not explain why Savarkar supported the British Government’s campaign for war effort and pleaded with Hindu youth to join in the armed forces in huge numbers. His move looked like supporting the enemy (British rulers). There were two main reasons -

British had been predominantly recruiting Muslims from Punjab and North West Frontier Province into the Indian Army. Their percentage had risen to 70%. This posed a grave threat to Indian freedom.

Moreover, Gandhi’s policy of constant capitulation to Muslim demands had also created a sense of superiority among Muslims and inferiority among Hindus. Military training of Hindus was the only answer. If not, Muslims would have joined in the armed forces in large numbers again and be trained in warfare.

 

* It had been Savarkar’s misfortune that other leaders realised the importance of his preaching years later. Shewalkar says that at the time of Savarkar’s 61st birthday (i.e. in May1944) a well-known Socialist leader said, “I worship the Savarkar of 1910.” This is absurd. Due to his support of Hindu youth joining as recruits in armed forces Savarkar had become an outcast during World War II. The remark was made by a Socialist leader in 1937 after Savarkar was released from internment.

 

* Violence /non-violence

Shewalkar refers to the paper Talwar run by Savarkar in 1906 and says that in opinion of Savarkar it is absurd to talk of constitutional movement when India has no constitution. Therefore we had no choice but to take up arms.

Once again, this is wrong. The thoughts were expressed by Savarkar in his letter from jail in Andaman Islands dated 4 August 1918.

 

* Shewalkar makes an extraordinary claim that Savarkar was externed by Government of India, he would not be allowed back in India. And therefore he composed his famous poem- Sagara Pran Talmala (Oh Seas take me back to my motherland). No such order exists.

 

* Savarkar’s elder brother Babarao was sent to Transportation for Life to Andaman Islands. According to Shewalkar, Babarao’s wife Yesutai wrote to Savarkar “You are in England. Now what will happen to me? Why did you bring such calamity on us?.” Savarkar wrote a letter of consolation to Yesutai.

This is outrageous. Yesutai was a woman of extraordinary courage. British administration had left her homeless and penniless. But she never cursed Savarkar. She simply stated the British oppression that she had to endure. That is all.

 

* In jail in Andaman Islands, Savarkar composed the poetry Kamala. He had no writing material, so he scribbled on prison wall. One Ramhari, a prisoner from Bihar learned the lines by heart. After his release from Andaman Islands he went to Calcutta and then straight to Mumbai to see Savarkar’s elder brother Babarao who published Kamala under a pseudo name Vijanavasi. – So says Shewalkar.

The truth is that Babarao was still in jail in Andaman Islands, Ramhari saw Dr Narayanrao, Savarkar’s younger brother.

 

* Social work of Savarkar while in internment in Ratnagiri (1924-37)

This part of Savarkar’s life is extremely difficult to describe. We just cannot imagine the social conditions of those days.

Shewalkar says, “ On the day of Dasara (Vijayadashami) Savarkar used to go out and offer people Sona leaves (as has been the custom of hundreds of years). People would welcome him and ask to come inside their houses. Savarkar used to say, ”I have an untouchable with me. I will come in only if he too can come in.” The owner of house would ask Savarkar and the untouchable to come in the drawing room. Then Savarkar would pretend that he was thirsty. The house owner would offer him a glass of water. Savarkar would say, ”No. Let this untouchable draw water from your well and we all drink that water.”

What a mockery of formidable obstacles faced by Savarkar!!

 

The cassette was recorded by Alurkar Audio and Video Production of Pune.

 

Savarkar’s life was incredible. It is difficult to tell the true story of his life. There is no need to lie or falsify to show respect for him.

 

 

3.3 England &Wales, Scotland and Ireland / Great Britain, United Kingdom

Despite our association with Britain for 250 years most Indians know very little about history of Britain. This became apparent when Dr Bedekar of Thane stayed with Shree Godbole in August 2003. For example, The Indian War of independence of 1857 was fought against the army created and controlled by the (English) East India Company. We therefore give some important details below -

 

In ancient times, Romans under Emperor Claudius invaded England and ruled that country and Wales for some 500 years. However, Romans could not conquer the Scots. Emperor Hadrian built a wall across the whole boundary between England and Scotland. Remains of this wall can be seen even today.

* After the collapse of Roman Empire, England was invaded by many countries, Angles from Denmark, Saxons from Germany and the Vikings. Remember King Canute? He was a Danish and ruled from 1017 to 1035.

* In 1066 came the Norman invasion. (Normans came from Normandy, part of France). At battle of Hastings, William the Conqueror defeated King Harold of England.

* In 1282, Edward I defeated and killed King of Wales. After this Wales ceased to be an independent country, although Welsh language survived even today. All the statistics are for England & Wales.

* Ireland was ruled by England for centuries. I could not find any Irish Kings.

 

* Scotland remained an independent country till 1707. (That is the year of death of Aurangzeb). Queen Anne was on throne (1702-1714)

James I of Scotland succeeded the English throne in 1603, after Elizabeth I. But the two nations remained separate. Charles I succeeded James I but was beheaded by Cromwell in 1649. Then followed the rule of Cromwell till 1660. English people were not prepared for a Republic. Charles II, son of Charles I was invited to become King of England. His son James II was deposed by the English and son-in-law of James II, William of Orange became King of England. Act of Settlement of 1701 ensured that only a Protestant would become King (or Queen) of England.

In 1707 moves were set in motion to combine Parliaments of the two countries together. The Act of Union of 1707 was passed by both Parliaments and Great Britain was born. But Scotland retained its identities. Scottish Law is different to English Law even today. In England we have Barristers, in Scotland we have Advocates. The Scots have their own church – Presbyterian, their own educational system and their own National Anthem.

* Ireland was incorporated into Great Britain by the Act of Union of 1801 and United Kingdom came into being and the present Union Jack was created.

On 1 January 1801, George III was declared King of Great Britain and Ireland

* If you look at old issues of the Royal Asiatic Society of London you can see the title Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

United Kingdom consists of Great Britain and Ireland. In December 1921, Irish Free State was born. But as the Protestants did not want to be a part of a Catholic state, Ireland was partitioned. Northern Ireland (called the six counties by Irish Catholics) remained part of United Kingdom. Southern Ireland became an independent nation. Therefore United Kingdom now consists of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Thus there are four Nations, England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland. In International matches they play separately. England won the recent World Rugby Cup in Australia in 2003, NOT U.K.

It is for this reason that we have some common Bank and Public Holidays, but also some local ones. In 2004 these days are as below-

2 January and 2 August are holidays in Scotland only

12 April and 30 August are holidays in England & Wales and Northern Ireland

17 March (St Patrick’s Day) and 12 July are holidays in Northern Ireland only.

St George is Patron Saint of England and St Andrews that of Scotland, but there are no holidays on their days in their respective nations.

 

English being the dominant nation, outsiders use the word English to denote people of the British Isles. We went to New York in July 2003. On a Day Tour we visited South New York. Recently Mayor Juliani had created some parks. There is a park in the name of Churchill. The plaque erected there in year 2000 reads Churchill was the Prime Minister of England during World War II.

 

Recently there was series of BBC2 about Britain's relations with other European countries. As you know the European Common Market was formed in the days of De Gaulle in early 1950s. The News of those days clearly stated, " England wants to join the ECC.”

The famous battle in air against German bombers in the 1940s is called ‘Battle of Britain’. The world Britain does NOT include Ireland.

 

* One also has to remember that there was discrimination against the Catholics and the Jews in England for a long time. The Irish Catholics were badly treated by the English for centuries, and were forbidden to practise any profession, denied University Education and had no right to property and no vote till the 19th century. Even in England non-Protestants had no access to higher Education. That was the reason for founding of University College, London in 1826.

 

Until recently Americans were described as WASPS - White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestants.

 

On Sunday 25 January 2004, Golden Globe awards took place in Los Angeles. On accepting the award for best series (The Office) actor Ricky Gervais said, “ I’m not from these parts, I’m from a little place called England. We used to run the world before you.” He did not say that he came from United Kingdom or even Great Britain.

 

We have got to learn to use such information in our arguments with our adversaries.

 

 

4 Why we cannot tell the truth.

People still ask us, “If what you say about Tajmahal is correct why don’t Indian Historians accept it?” Here is a typical example of today’s life in the west illustrating why we cannot speak the truth.

On 18 February 2002, Chris Brooke reported for the Daily Mail

£170,000 for cancer care whistle-blower forced to resign

A hospital secretary forced to quit her job after blowing the whistle about the treatment of cancer patients is to receive up to £170,000 compensation.

Irene Mounsey, 53, successfully took health chiefs to an employment tribunal, claiming she was victimised for two years after speaking out in support of concerns raised by her surgeon boss.

However, she won her case on the basis that health chiefs had breached new legislation designed to protect whistle-blowers.

Consultant Robert Phipps had warned NHS management in Bradford that more that 160 breast cancer patients should have received follow-up radiotherapy treatment to prevent the disease recurring.

Mrs Mounsey said she too raised concerns about the chaotic cancer care at St Luke’s Hospital. But she claimed management turned on her and Mr Phipps

She was threatened with disciplinary action over her performance after she appeared on a regional television news programme in support of the surgeon.

Executives at the Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust ordered an inquiry into the interview. But Mrs Mounsey became so stressed by the backlash that she resigned on the grounds of ill health in January this year. She took the case to a tribunal and won her case in August. Yesterday, a hearing decided to delay a decision on her payout until next February.

Her husband Graham, a retired company manager, represented her at the tribunal. Mrs Mounsey from Halifax, is demanding the £170,000 for lost earnings and damages.

She said yesterday she hoped her victory would give others the confidence to speak out.

‘I didn’t want to go through this fight but I wasn’t going to give in. People shouldn’t be victimised because of speaking out. It’s very difficult to do that and cope with the consequences which are more than just financial.’

Mrs Mounsey spoke about the toll the fight has taken on her mental health. ‘Near the end I used to feel sick walking into work,’ she said.

‘I’m incapable of working at the moment but even if I could, I’m 53 now. Who’s going to employ someone who has been off for two years and is a whistle-blower?’

Her boss Mr Phipps left his job in September 2000 and he has already won his case for unfair dismissal.

When he was suspended, Mrs Mounsey said the action of three managers who searched her office made her feel ‘bullied and harassed.’

 

When Yorkshire Television featured action taken against the surgeon, Mrs Mounsey appeared in February 2001 to declare; ‘Mr Phipps is being made a scapegoat.’

Lawyers for the trust admitted that it broke the law by threatening action over her whistle-blowing.

Legislation has been introduced to protect the rights of staff who speak out on matters of legitimate public interest.

However Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust continue to deny Mrs Mounsey’s claims that she had been victimised and has defended its care of cancer patients, dismissing her allegations as ‘without foundation.’

 

 

5 Historical research

5.1 Tagore and Jana Gana Mana

There is no doubt that the song Jana Gana Mana was chosen as India’s national anthem by Nehru and his puppets to please Muslims. But recently a malicious rumour has been spreading through E Mail, that the song Jana Gana Mana was composed by Ravindranath Tagore to welcome King George V and Queen Mary at the time of Delhi Darbar in 1911. Nothing can be more perverse. Tagore was never a subservient person. He was a man of deep self-respect. Shree Godbole therefore sent out two E Mails pointing out the truth.

The facts are as follows -

 

* Yes Rabindranath Tagore did write Jana Gana Mana song. But it had nothing to do with welcoming King George V. And that song was NOT played at Delhi Durbar on 12 December 1911.

* The song played at Delhi Durbar was written by another Tagore. His name was Yatindra Mohan Tagore (Thakur). He was Ravindranath's grandfather's brother's grandson.

I hope to get the text of this song in early 2004.

 

* In 1911, just 15 days after the Delhi Durbar, Jana Gana Mana was sung at the annual session of the Congress Party at Calcutta.

 

* As far as I know Ravindranath did not even attend the Delhi Durbar. He was furious with the British after the partition of Bengal in 1906.

 

* At the time of Jalianwala Bagh Massacre in Amritsar in 1919, Ravindranath was the only public figure who had courage to denounce the British openly and renounce his knighthood.

 

* It is now almost forgotten that in 1904 Ravindranath composed a poem praising Shivaji. I do have it Bengali.

 

" 1912 was an eventful year. Early that year he (Tagore) was given the first important public reception of his career when Bangiya Sahitya Parishad felicitated him in Calcutta on the completion of his fiftieth year. Two months after, he read at Overtoun Hall his famous essay, ' My interpretation of India's History', wherein he gave a prose paraphrase as it were of his 'Jana Gana Mana' song (now the National Song of India), earlier composed for the anniversary of the Brahmo Samaj, proclaiming that India stood for unity in the midst of diversity."

 

Godbole hopes to get more details in 2004. It is disgraceful that person like Tagore should be maligned in this way.

 

Of course, we should have the guts to sing the full text of Vande Mataram at our functions. It has a strong historical connection with the Indian freedom struggle against the British. But that is no excuse for maligning person like Tagore.

 

 

5.2 British Historians, Muslims and Tragedy of India

After conquering India, various officers of the (English) East India Company wrote History of India. By depicting that the Indian Muslims were the rulers in India before the English they had created a bloating in the minds of Indian Muslims leading to false pride and arrogance, intransigency, monstrous ambitions, resulting ultimately in the partition of India in August 1947.

 

Shree Godbole had given some inclination on the subject in his newsletter number 6 of 16 February 1982. Now he is writing up a full article on the subject. Late Historian Shree Setumadhavrao Pagdi had also given some indication of this in his article in 1974. At present, Godbole’s article runs into 19 pages, some details are to be added. But if you wish to read the article as it is please contact Godbole.

 

* Future work

Pagdi had written some important historical essays. Unfortunately they are all in Marathi. Shree Godbole intends to collect them and make the knowledge available in English for wider reading. If you can help Godbole with Pagdi’s articles, please contact him.

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. BEHAVIOUR OF CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS TODAY

8.1 THE CHRISTIANS

 

8.1.1 Catholics and Protestants in North Ireland

The feud between Catholics and Protestants continues even today. In 2001 we saw horrible scenes of Protestants shouting abuse at 4 to 5 year old girls attending Holy Cross Primary School in Belfast. Parents required Army and Police escorts to take their children to school. We thought the matter has been resolved. Oh no.

On 7 January 2003 the London based paper Metro reported –

Pipe bomb found at primary school

A terrorist bomb was found at the entrance to a Roman Catholic school in Belfast yesterday.

The pipe bomb was spotted a few minutes before children arrived for the first day of the new term. As the device was made safe by Army bomb experts, children used the alternative entry to Holy Cross Primary in the north of the city. The girls’ school next to a Protestant enclave of the city’s Ardoyne area was at the centre of a three-month loyalist protest in 2001.

Police and troops were needed to escort children to the school gates through a gauntlet of abuse. Father Aidan Troy, chairman of governors at the school, said the incident was horrific. ’We thought we had left all this behind.’ He added. ’Thank God no child was hurt.’

Fr Troy said he thought it was the ‘irresponsible action’ of a minority rather than expressive of the feelings of the entire community. The foiled attack, which Sinn Fein assembly member Gerry Kelly attributed to the loyalist Ulster Defence association, was widely condemned.’ The New Year has just begun and already we have a disgraceful attack on children by a faction of UDA,’ said Mr Kelly.

SDLP assembly member Alban Maginness described the targeting of children as cowardly.

 

 

8.2 THE MUSLIMS

8.2.1 Bible banned

BBC1 carries a consumer affairs programme called Watchdog. On 10 February 2004 (1900 to 1930 hrs) it dealt with raw holiday deals, which some people had to endure. A devout Christian couple booked their holidays to the Maldives, in Indian Ocean. At the last minute they were told that they must not carry their bible with them as it was forbidden in that Muslim country.

Later the Foreign Office confirmed that Government of Maldives did indeed forbid carrying Bible by visitors.

 

8.2.2 So-called Honour killings continue to take place

On 12 December 2003 Jan McGirk reported from Islambad for The Independent. She says – Pakistan tackles honour killings after student death.

Afsheen Musarrat was allegedly killed by her father for love and honour.

He confessed to strangling the 23-year-old computer student after she eloped with her college sweetheart last month, and claimed that only her death could recover the family’s sullied reputation.

“I gave her sleeping pills in a cup of tea and then strangled her with her scarf,”

Musarrat Sahu admitted to police in a signed statement this week. “Look sir, when I have no honour, I have nothing else,” he said. “Honour is the only thing a man has.”

Handcuffed in the police station, Mr Sahu, a lawyer, recalled Afsheen’s final moments, “ I can still hear her screams; she was my favourite daughter. I want to destroy my hands and end my life,” he sobbed.

 

Hassan Mustafa, her lover, was also the bride’s second cousin and has been hiding since her murder on 12 November. Feudal custom demands that he also be killed for defying the clan. Police are trying to find him and put him in protective custody.

More than 450 honour killings have been recorded this year but the majority go unreported. Although illegal, these murders are rarely prosecuted, because police are reluctant to meddle in family affairs.

Brothers, fathers, or uncles routinely kill women who appear to have flouted the strict tribal code, and they often stand to gain money or property instead of punishment for their crime. Islamic law allows a victim’s heirs to pardon the murderer in exchange for “blood money”.

 

The case is extraordinary because the President, General Musharraf, who presents himself to the west as a moderate Muslim who protects human rights, was challenged by the local media to bring the killer to justice according to Pakistan’s secular law. Once he ordered the body to be exhumed, and warned that murder charges would be pressed if post mortem analysis showed foul play, the Punjab police suddenly took an interest. An official autopsy noted bruising on her neck caused by strangulation.

 

Afsheen’s ill-fated romance began at university where she dated Hassan Mustafa, a distant cousin from the same village in the Punjab. There was an old rift between the relatives back home, and rumours about the pair distressed her grandfather, Allah Ditta.

 

A marriage with a more suitable cousin was arranged for Afsheen but she, distraught, ran off with Hassan to Rawalpindi. The family tracked them down early last month. Five days after she returned home, she was dead.

“her family swore they would not harm her but they didn’t keep their word.” Hassan told reporters by telephone.” My life is in danger.”

Allah Ditta, the family’s 75-year-old patriarch, and ten others are suspected of a role in the murder, according to Hamid Mukhtar Gondal, the Multan police chief. But the grandfather says the army and police are pursuing him for political reasons.

“The girl was ill, she had a breathing problem,” he told reporters.” It was because of this illness that she died.” While this test case dominated headlines, several other honour killings have occurred since Afsheen’s body was exhumed. Rana Ijaz Ahmad, Human Rights Adviser to Punjab chief minister, said “the government will not allow anyone to torture women.”

 

But Pakistan’s parliament deferred legislation against honour killings last month, after a group of powerful lawmakers insisted it is a feudal tradition and walked out before the vote. Whatever the verdict is for Afsheen Musarraf’s killer, analysts predict that feudals will continue to get away with murder.

 

8.2.3 ‘Paki’ is an offensive word!!

When Pakistan was created in 1947 Muslims were delighted by the word Pakistan as it implied the land of the pure. But in England the word Paki is now offensive.

The London Newspaper Metro reported on 17 June 2003

Football fan convicted of racist chant

A football fan who joined in racist chanting at a match has been convicted in a landmark court case. Two judges ruled Sean Ratcliffe was guilty of taking part in chanting of a racist nature, contrary to the 1991 Football (Offences) Act, in what is believed to be the first case of its kind to reach the High Court. The 21-year-old from Newcastle-under-Lyme in Staffordshire was among up to 100 Port Vale supporters chanting ’You are just a town full of Pakis’ at Oldham Athletic supporters during a league match. Lord Justice Auld said the word ‘Paki’ was a racially offensive slang expression, which could not be used affectionately, like Aussie or Brit.

 

8.2.4 The Ahemadis

On 3 October 2003 Jonathan Peters reported for the Daily Telegraph. He said

Western Europe’s largest mosque opens in Morden.

Members of the Ahmadi community will today inaugurate what they describe as the largest mosque complex in Western Europe, able to accommodate more than 10,000 worshippers.

The Baitul Futuh Mosque in Morden, south London, which features a 50ft stainless steel dome and a 100 ft minaret, opens amid controversy.

The community is not recognised by other Muslims as genuinely Islamic.

 

The building, a few miles from the community’s first London centre in Putney, south-west London, built nearly 80 years ago, is expected to be packed with devotees from around the world for the inaugural prayers to be held by the worldwide supreme head of the community, Hadhrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad.

 

But Iqbal Sacranie, the secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said the community had exaggerated its numbers and influence. He argued that it should not even use the word mosque to describe the building. “They can call their place of worship by any other name except for a mosque because that is for Muslims.” he said. “They are outside the fold of Islam.

A person could be a Muslim only if he or she believed that the prophet Mohammed was the last and final messenger of God, he said.

 

However, the community, which was founded by Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in northern India in 1889, believes that its founder was the final messenger. It claims to have 200 million followers.

The building, which took two years to complete, cost about £15 million, most of it raised from donations by devotees.

Rafiq Ahmad Hayat, the community’s British president, said: “ The basic tenet of Islam is that of peace and the tenet of this mosque is to propagate that tenet throughout the world. We will release some white doves to symbolise peace.”

 

We need to note that despite rejection by other Muslims, the Ahmadis still consider themselves as Muslims. They do not say, ”We are Ahmadis and not Muslims.”

 

 

VANDE MATARAM