INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH INTO TRUE HISTORY

 

NEWSLETTER NO. 44 OF 16 OCTOBER 2005

 

 

1. NEWS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS

1.1 Godbole retires

After working for London Underground Railways for nearly 20 years Shree Godbole took early retirement in July 2005. He can now concentrate fully on his historical research.

 

1.2 Rationalism of Veer Savarkar.

Oxford University has received a copy of the above book by Shree Godbole. After studying it Dr Owen of Department of Politics requested Godbole to translate Savarkar’s 43 Newsletters from London and also his book Shatruchya Shibirat. Godbole has agreed.

 

1.3 DVD of film on Savarkar

This is now available from all well-known music shops in Mumbai /Pune. Godbole also has some copies.

 

1.4 Museum dedicated to Indian Revolutionaries.

Guy Aldred, a British sympathiser of Savarkar had published much information on Savarkar and the hardships suffered by political prisoners on the Andaman Islands. These were published in his paper Herald of Revolt. Some of the articles were reprinted 50 years later. Late Mukund Sonapatki had given these to Godbole who passed them on to the above Museum.

 

1.5 Archiving of old documents

Our friend Dr Bedekar from Thane has realised that unless we take steps to preserve old documents they will soon vanish forever. He has therefore bought a machine for archiving. Shree Godbole has some articles from Sobat weekly of Pune. These will soon be archived.

 

If you have any such documents (paper cuttings, photos, letters, books) please contact Dr Bedekar.

 

1.6 Japanese History books

In April 2005 there were many violent demonstrations in front of Japanese shops and businesses in China. There was wide spread damage to property.

 

The Chinese accuse Japanese of hiding from their school textbooks, atrocities committed when occupying parts of China during Second World War

Japan

Ministers hit back yesterday at Chinese claims that new schoolbooks whitewash Japan’s wartime atrocities. Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machiura denied the publications, which have sparked protests across China, glossed over events such as the rape of Nanjing when 350,000 people were massacred. He claimed Chinese textbooks were also ‘extreme’ in interpreting history. Last week Japanese premier Junichiro Koizumi apologised for wartime aggression. But Chinese president Hu Jintao demanded Tokyo backed apologies with ‘action’. It came as a summit in Indochina was attempting to end the war of words.

(Metro 25 April 2005, p12)

 

Your books distort past too, Japan tells China.

On 25 April Richard Lloyd Parry from Tokyo reported in the Times (p35)

The Japanese Government is to conduct a survey of bias and propaganda in Chinese school textbooks to counter claims that it distorts its own history.

Nobutuka Machimura, the Japanese Foreign Minister announced the survey yesterday after an inconclusive summit on Saturday between Junichiro Koizumi, the Japanese Prime Minister, and President Hu Jintao of China.

“From the perspective of a Japanese person, Chinese textbooks appear to teach that everything the Chinese Government has done has been correct.” Mr Machimura told a television chat show.

“There is a tendency toward this in any country, but the Chinese textbooks are extreme in the way they uniformly convey the ‘Our Country is correct’ point of view.

He defended Mr Koizumi against charges that the hour-long summit had achieved nothing. “It was fully significant that the two leaders met and spent a message that the friendship between Japan and China is important.”

Mr Koizumi and Mr Hu avoided mutual recrimination after three weeks of violent anti-Japanese demonstrations in China. Mr Koizumi did not repeat a demand for an apology and compensation for damage caused when mob of young Chinese stoned the Japanese stoned the Japanese Consulate in Shanghai. Mr Hu adopted a tone of icy politeness. “Japan’s mistaken actions over the issue of history and Taiwan have hurt the feelings of China and related Asian nations,” he said.

There were significant anti-Japanese demonstrations in China over the weekend, thanks in part, to stern commentaries in the Chinese media last week and the deployment of 3,000 police to guard the Japanese Consulate, but such pressure has done little to address disagreements between the two sides. These include a dispute over the ownership of the remote Senkaku or Dialoyu Islands, Japan’s campaign for a seat on the United Nations Security Council and its implied opposition to a takeover by China of Taiwan.

However, the issues causing greatest resentment concern interpretations of the Second World War when the Japanese Imperial Army occupied much of China. Two things especially enraged Mr Hu. Mr Koizumi’a annual visits to Tokyo’s Yashukumi Shrine, where the country’s war dead are enshrined alongside war criminals; and a recent school history textbook playing down Japanese wartime brutality.

Hence Tokyo’s plan to scrutinise Chinese textbooks, which paint a highly self-serving picture of the Communist Party. They dwell on Japanese brutality, but do not mention millions who died in political purges and the famine that followed Chairman Mao’s Great Leap Forward

 

Our comments – * We should never forget barbarity of Chinese rule in Tibet and its treacherous aggression on India’s borders in the North East and North-West in 1962.

* We need not take the side of the Japanese either. In any Indian dispute with USA the Japanese have always behaved as puppets of the Americans. They try to treat India and Pakistan with equanimity.

We should always try to see if such disputes could be used to our advantage.

 

1.7 Language war flares in Belgium.

Belgium is such a small country that one can hardly see it even on maps of Europe. And still they have language problems!

On 21 April 2005 The Independent reported –

Brussels

Johan Vande Lanotte, the vice-premier, warned of a government crisis if Belgium’s coalition parties fail to act swiftly after Dutch-speaking Flemish parties demanded an officially French-speaking district of Brussels should speak Dutch. Francophone parties insist on the status quo.

 

1.8 EU bars showing of van Gogh film

On 21 April 2005 The Independent reported –

Brussels

The EU Parliament has scrapped the screening of the film made by the murdered Dutch director Theo van Gogh, which criticised the treatment of women by Islam. It feared a lawsuit from the film’s owners and there were security concerns. Submission was shown at the EU press centre yesterday.

 

1.9 All Muslims are not the same

On 16 November 2004 David Aaronovitch reported for The Guardian (p5) about the same film. He wrote –

The outline of the recent Van Gogh case is relatively clear. A provocative Dutch filmmaker makes a film that many Muslims find offensive, since it involves a veiled woman with verses of the Koran inscribed on her naked body. The filmmaker is then horribly and publicly murdered by a Muslim extremist. The balloon goes up, racists attacks an Islamic school, there is much agonising about the question of Muslims and free speech, and –remarkably – Index on Censorship (which is supposed to be in favour of unfettered freedom of expression) carries an article by an associate editor, Rohan Jayasekera, which seems to blame the victim himself for the crime.

In one way, the answer is obvious. Some folks just don’t seem to understand that free speech is about tolerating opinions that you find offensive, and such people need to be re-educated into what a democratic society is all about. And, if we were being honest, and remembering the Rushdie affair, aren’t the most sensitive and those most in need of re-education to be found in the Muslim community?

 

Yesterday I watched the Van Gogh film on the Internet. And the first thing that I though was that it would never have been shown on British television as it was on Dutch TV. It begins and ends with the intoning of Prayers to Allah. In between, the camera passes over the woman’s eyes (the rest of her face is covered) and thinly veiled naked body, her voice telling how she has been the victim of domestic violence, of rape by a relative, and how she dislikes to cover her entire face. When her face is uncovered, it is bloody and bruised.

What the film suggests is that, somehow, domestic violence and rape are linked to specifically Muslim ways of seeing the world and the relationship between men and women. Given the fact that the film is made by a non-Muslim (indeed by a noted critic of Islam), the effect is disturbing. What is the film aimed at?

…… Murder maddens and some good people have accordingly gone mad. On one centre-left website, a Dutch writer expressed fury that a TV presenter had argued that the killing meant Dutch society had to do some “soul searching”. Dutch society has (to do) much soul searching?” the writer (taking the handle of “Voltaire”) asked angrily, adding; “Theo was not killed by Dutch society but by a Muslim. But then Muslims rarely do much soul searching.”

 

See that? In a blink of a cursor? See how ”a Muslim” so quickly became “Muslims?” There are a billion Muslims with a hundred thousand interpretations of the Koran, but they are all now transformed into the Muslim who killed Van Gogh.

 

Note – so, unknowingly the author has confessed that there are hundred thousand interpretations of the Koran. And who is going to decide which interpretation is correct? The force of sword!! That has been the history of Islam.

Von Gough was murdered on 2 November 2004 in Brussels. He exposed the oppression of women in Muslim society.

 

1.10 How history gets twisted – even today

On 23 April 2005 Michael Binyon wrote in the Times –

It’s all the Raj again.

Nostalgia for Imperial India is all around us, but our mist-eyed view of the sub-continent needs an update.

…. We treat India rather as the Americans treat little old England – a country deeply ingrained in our history, but one that exists mostly in the clichés of our mind. When we go there, we want the past – the Delhi of Lutyens, the Calcutta of Clive and the old steam train to Simla. We want to laugh at anachronisms and quaint Indian English, discover our influence in Indian tastes for whisky and cricket and wonder which was the greater disaster; 300 years of British rule or 30 years of socialism learnt at the LSE.

 

Note –(1)  see how the imperial arrogance springs? Who told the writer that the British ruled India for 300 years? Let us get the facts.

British rule in India ended in August 1947. 300 years back will bring us to 1647. At that time the (English) East India had just a few trading posts. They did not get Sashti (Salsette) and 60 islands (Bombay) till 1661.

The English got foothold in Bengal only after 1757. So, their influence even in Bengal did not last for 200 years.

* The Marathas were not defeated till 1818 and the Sikhs till 1848.

We do not deny that the British Raj did not exist, but let us the correct picture.

 

(2) The writer however mentions a new book – The Butcher of Amritsar by Nigel Collett, (a biography of Brigadier General Reginald Dyer) published by Hambledon and London, price £25. offer £20 from Books First,

Tel 0870-160-8080

 

1.11 How the British see us Indians today?

World Environment Day was celebrated on Sunday 5 June 2005. On the 6th the London newspaper Metro published picture of a rubbish dump in Delhi (p7). The caption reads – Birds fly over a burning garbage dump in search of food on the outskirts of New Delhi yesterday, which was World Environment Day.

Picture taken by Reuters.

 

We don’t know if the Indian High commission condemned this news item but on Wednesday 8th June Metro published a letter from Martin Atkinson of Sheffield. He says – Blame New Delhi’s dump? What a load of rubbish.

Why choose a picture of New Delhi to illustrate World Environment Day? Any British city has a similar dump in or near it – just substitute seagulls and crows for the black kites and storks and you would have the same picture. Delhi is one of the cleanest cities in the world given its enormous population. All buses, taxis and tuk-tuks run on low emission LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) and lorries are banned from the city between 8am to 8pm, so exhaust emissions are low. British cities would do well to follow Delhi’s lead.

 

1.12 The Tsunami disaster in December 2004

We all heard the terrible news about the earthquake in Indonesia and its aftermath in December 2004. Here are some observations –

(i) At the start America’s declared aid for disaster was misery. But they soon realised the political importance of it and their figure topped the list of donors. Of course, once the days pass by who can check how much aid the Americans actually gave?

(ii) Our friend Dr Anand Joshi was in Madras at the time of the tragedy. He was surprised at the activities of Local government officials (Municipal, District Board and State). They all quickly sprang into action and brought life to normal. He was surprised to see this change in attitude in Indians.

(iii) Indian Government gave aid to Government of Shree Lanka but NOT to Tamils. Of course the Indian Navy co-operated fully to curb activities of Tamil Tigers. But when it comes to supplying essential goods to flood victims Indian Navy could not help. We all know damn well that the Government of Shree Lanka will NOT pass on the aid to Tamils. Indians are still wedded to the traditions laid down by Gandhi and Nehru. We despise helping our kith and kin.

(iv) Andaman Islands – we were surprised to know that the cellular jail where Savarkar was kept and other structures were NOT affected. A group of enthusiasts from Pune flew to Andaman to confirm this fact.

 

 

2. AROUND LONDON TOUR OF PLACES ASSOCIATED WITH INDIAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS

Godbole conducted one tour on 12 June 2005 for 19 teachers from Hindusthan.

During the tour it was noticed that a plaque has been fixed on the house where Shyamji used to live. On making further enquiries it was revealed that this was done by our friend Shree Hemant Padhya of Milton Keynes on 15 August 2004.

 

Caxton Hall

At a later date Godbole visited the famous Caxton Hall and noticed big construction works between the back of the Hall and St James’s Park station. It seems that once the building of offices is completed the front of the Hall can be seen again. It had been shrouded in scaffolding for a number of years.

 

Slide shows of Special London Tour

20 September 2005

Dr Agarkar of Kalyan made a show of the slides of the tour for 20 members of Rotary Club of Chembur (Mumbai). It was well received.

 

3. BEHAVIOUR OF CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS TODAY

3.1 THE CHRISTIANS

The new German Pope called himself Pope Benedict XVI. On 26 April 2005 Bruce Johnston reported from Rome for The Telegraph. He wrote –

Pope calls for unity and Muslim friendship.

Pope reached out to other faiths and Christian denominations yesterday with a message of reconciliation that was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams (seen in the picture).

The new Pope thanked religious leaders for attending his inauguration Mass when he met them for an audience at the Vatican. ”I am particularly grateful for the presence among our midst of members of the Muslim community, and I express my appreciation for the dialogue between Muslims and Christians, both at local and international level.

[It is astonishing that one of the invitees was Robert Mugabe, the butcher of Zimbabwe]

 

On 21 August 2005 the new Pope visited the country of origin – Germany. He met leaders of German Protestants (majority of Germans are Protestants), Jews and Muslims. But we cannot find a single sentence expressing his desire to meet leaders of Hindus in Germany.

 

Is it not time we became wiser by such events?

 

 

3.2 THE MUSLIMS

3.2.1 IRAN 17 March 2005

A serial killer who raped and murdered at least 16 children was executed yesterday. Mohammad Bijeh, 22 was flogged 100 times in front of a 5,000 strong crowd before being hanged from a crane, a slow death where his neck is not broken. The mother of one victim put the noose around his neck in Pakdasht, 50 km south of Teheran. Bijeh, dubbed the ‘Teheran desert vampire’ poisoned his victims before sexually abusing them and burying them in shallow graves last year. The children, aged eight to fifteen were mostly illegal refugees from Afghanistan. The death toll is feared to be higher as victims’ families may have been too scared to go to police.

(Metro, published in London 17 March 2005, page 26)

Comment – We can understand the horrific punishment, given the crime of the offender, but how come such a situation exist in an Islamic state?

 

3.2.2 London bombings

On 7 July, four Muslim suicide bombers detonated bombs on three underground trains and one Bus in London. Some 50 people died and many were injured.

On 21 July, Police foiled another series of attempts by arresting four suspects.

Here are some of our thoughts -

(a) The bombings were no surprise. London had become a heaven for terrorists. Over the last three years Newspapers were full of details of how Muslim youth are recruited in England for fighting in Bosnia, Chechnya and Kashmir. I remember one employee of Railtrack using his office computer to recruit Muslims to fight in Kashmir. But they all said, “Look we are not carrying out any bombings in Britain.” British government therefore knew what was happening.

(b) Muslim leaders condemned the suicide bombers. But was it out of horror or the realisation that it only needs one crackpot to kill many Muslims who always gather on Fridays. Moreover, NO Muslim leader has said that such actions are against the principles of Islam.

 

(c) Journalists gave background of the suicide bombers and told us how

young Muslims became fundamentalists or Radicals after visiting Pakistan. However they did NOT raise the following questions –

 

(i) When the Tsunami struck in December 2004 where were the Muslim Fundamentalists flocking to help fellow Muslims in Indonesia? We did not see any Mullahs, Maulavis and Ayatollahs. Why not?

(ii) When various countries announced their aids why was the Muslim contribution paltry? Why did we not see the same Muslim bombers demonstrating outside the embassies of rich Arab nations?

(iii) Was it NOT against the tenets of Islam to accept aid from non-believers? Why did no Muslim Fundamentalist protest?

(iv) Whatever one thinks of military action of US and Britain in Iraq the suicide bombers are making life hell for ordinary civilians. Fundamentalists do not condemn such actions. Why?

(v) Remember the case of Zahid Mubarek the young Muslim who was murdered by his racist cellmate Robert Stewart at Feltham Young Offender’s Institution in February 2000? At the public enquiry in November 2004 it was revealed that Warders ‘missed 14 chances’ to halt race killing in cell. Did any of the suicide bombers get angry? Did they want to teach a lesson to the prison authorities? Did they want to avenge the death of a Fellow Muslim right here in England? NO. So, what do they do? They kill innocent civilians!!!

 

(vi) When King Fahd of Saudi Arabia died on 2 August 2005, he was buried in an unmarked grave. Similarly when his predecessor King Faisal died he too was buried in an unmarked grave. That is pure Islam. Surely the Fundamentalists know this. Why don’t they insist on that tradition be followed? Jinnah’s tomb in Karachi should be demolished as a start and all memorial stones in Muslim graveyards should also be removed.

Similarly all the shrines in Iran where Shia Imams are buried should be destroyed, including that of Ayatollah Khomeni. Why Fundamentalist are quiet about it?

 

(vii) Jinnah’s picture appears on all currency notes of Pakistan. That amounts to idolatry. Fundamentalist should insist on burning such notes. Why don’t they?

 

3.2.3 Shariah law for Muslims in Britain?

BBC Radio 4 broadcasts the programme Sunday dealing with religious matters (0710 to 0800 hrs on Sundays).

On Sunday 6th February 2005 some Muslims demanded that they should have Shariah law for Muslims in Britain. Their argument? Well, during the British Raj there was no uniform Civil Code in India. Muslims were allowed to have their own Personal Law – i.e. Shariah. So, why not in Britain?

 

Could it happen? YES. Let us look at the Daily Mail of 7 January 2005. On the front page we find –

SHAMELESS

Labour’s cynical bid to win back the Muslim vote it lost over Iraq.

Graeme Wilson the Political Correspondent wrote –

Labour assures Muslims of the major influence they have on Government policy – and delivers an explosive attack on opposition leader Michael Howard.

The offensive comes in an ingratiating article in Muslim Weekly, one of the biggest selling papers in the community, written by Energy minister and loyal Blairite Mike O’Brien.

A ban on religious discrimination was delivered just two weeks after a request from the Muslim Council of Britain, he says. A clause recognising religion as a factor in cases of violence and harassment was delivered in response to Muslim demands.

Mr O’Brien also reminded Muslims that Mr Blair has read the Koran. And he claims a personal empathy with their fears over anti-terror laws as an Irish Catholic who lived in Birmingham at the time of the pub bombings there.

But perhaps the most controversial passages are the attacks on Mr Howard, the most prominent Jewish figure in British politics. He questions whether the Tory leader would defend Muslim rights or stand up for Turkey’s bid to join the EU.

‘Ask yourselves what will Michael Howard do for British Muslims?’ he asks. ‘Will his foreign policy aim to help Palestine? Will he promote legislation to protect you from religious hatred and discrimination?

‘Will he give you the choice of sending your children to a faith school? Will he stand up for the right of Muslim women to wear the hijab (traditional dress)? Will he really fight for Turkey, a Muslim country to join the EU? These are not academic questions.

… Mr O’Brien argues that the Premier’s decision to send British troops to Kosovo was based on his determination to stop Muslims being murdered by the Serbs. Many Muslims in Kosovo owe their lives to British intervention.’ He declares.

The lengthy list of benefits Mr O’Brien says Labour has delivered included decision to send doctors to help British Muslim pilgrims to Mecca.

Mr Blair had also been ‘appalled’ that Muslims used to be excluded from Remembrance Day ceremonies and had ordered changes to give them a prominent role.

Labour had also scrapped the Primary Rule, which Mr O’Brien claims discriminated against people coming from Muslim countries. Under the rule, people applying for a visa who were already married to someone living in Britain had to prove that the ‘primary purpose’ of their marriage was not to gain entry to U.K.

 

Notes (1) Conservatives were upset by the article, but their policies are essentially the same!!

(2) Muslim Weekly was launched September 2004 as the first national weekly for the Muslim community. It sells around 20,000 copies a week

 

 

4.Research findings

4.1 Forgers ‘tried to rewrite biblical history’

On 31 December 2004, Conal Urquhart reported from Jerusalem for the Guardian. He says ;-

Hundreds of biblical artefacts in museums all over the world could be fakes, it has emerged after Israeli investigators uncovered what they claim is a sophisticated forgery ring.

 

Four men have been charged with faking of some of the most important biblical discoveries in recent years. The artefacts in question include an ossuary which was believed to contain the bones of James, the brother of Jesus, and a table with written inscription by a Jewish king in the ninth century before Christ. The indictment against the men in Jerusalem says; “ During the last 20 years many archaeological items were sold, or an attempt was made to sell them, in Israel and in the world, that were not actually antiques. These items, many of them of great scientific, religious, sentimental, political and economic value, were created specifically with intent to defraud.”

 

The forgers not only conned buyers out of millions of dollars, said officials of the Israel antiquities Authority, but also damaged the science of archaeology, casting doubt on the authenticity of every artefact not uncovered in an authorised dig.

 

Doubts about the artefacts emerged after Israeli police began to hear rumours of an Egyptian craftsman living in Israel who would boast of his part in the forgeries while drinking in Tel Aviv. Detectives launched an investigation two years ago, which rapidly became a global exercise.

 

The indictment lists 124 witnesses including antiquities collectors, archaeologists, officials from Sotheby’s auction house and representatives of the British Museum and the Brooklyn Museum. The forgers were accused of using an authentic artefact and then adding an inscription. They would then add a coating to emulate the grime that accumulated over centuries.

The fakes fooled experts for years and the virtually worthless artefacts were grossly multiplied in value.

 

The four men indicted are a Tel Aviv collector, Oded Golan, owner of the James ossuary and the Yehoash tablet; Robert Deutsch, an inscriptions expert who teaches at Haifa University; Shilomo Cohen, a collector, and Faiz-al-Amaleh, an antiquities dealer. Mr Golan said in a statement on Wednesday “there is not one grain of truth in the fantastic allegations related to me,” and that the investigation was aimed at “destroying collecting and trade in antiquities in Israel.” Mr Deutsch dismissed the indictment as “ridiculous”

 

Shuka Dorfman, head of the Israel Antiquities Authority said the forgery ring had been operating for more than 20 years and has been “trying to change history”. Scholars said the forgers were exploiting the deep emotional need of Jews and Catholics to find physical evidence to reinforce their faith.

“ This does not discredit the profession. It discredits unscrupulous dealers and collectors.” Said Eric Myers, an archaeological professor at Duke University in North Carolina.

 

Other forgeries included an ivory pomegranate which scholars believed was the only remaining artefact from King Solomon’s Temple. The James ossuary, with the inscription “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus”, was thought to be the only physical link in existence today to the life of Jesus 2006 years ago.

 

Shaul Naim, of the Israel police, said, “We have reason to believe that many more forged antiquities which we haven’t uncovered yet are being held by private collectors in Israel and abroad, and in museums in Israel and abroad.”

 

Shimon Gibson, an Israeli archaeologist, said museums should review items of questionable origin. “Now it looks like we are going to have to go backward and double-check all our facts to make sure that what we thought was really is.”

 

4.2 The inconvenient lessons of papal history

The Independent of 21 April 2005 carried above article by Mark Steel. He says –

The question no one seems willing to ask is why the cardinals picked someone so old. It’s hardly worth their while going home as they’ll all be back again in a few weeks to pick the next one. Maybe if they keep popping back every few months they get a cheap deal with the hotel.

One spokesman for the Catholic Church, replying to someone who suggested the new Pope’s attitudes were a tad mediaeval, said, “ What we do know is he’s a man of holiness and prayer.” It is as well they picked him then. It would have been embarrassing if they’d sent him out to do mass and he’d said, “ I’ve never really seen the point in praying. Anyway, I don’t do Sunday mornings’cos that’s my day for playing snooker.”

 

Supporters of the new pontiff insist his aim is to preserve ”eternal truths” handed down from Jesus, guidance that can’t be compromised by changes in human society. For example, there can be no reversal of the ban on marriage for priests. Except that this rule wasn’t introduced until the 11th century, so for the first thousand years of the church the heathen bastards were ignoring their traditional values, until they got a grip and invented them. Even the first Pope, Saint Peter himself, was married. So hopefully the new Pope Benedict will atone for having St Peter’s Square hosed down every day with holy water, dirty filthy sinful concourse that it is.

 

Then there’s tradition introduced by Pope John XXII. Various movements had been set up in opposition to the church hierarchy, which had become grotesquely and publicly decadent. The new churches insisted the priesthood should live humble lives among the poor, in accordance with the methods of Jesus. So the Pope declared it was heresy to suggest Jesus was poor. Sermons under his rule must be brilliant. “ Jesus looked upon the famished thousands and sayeth unto them, ‘Fear not for thou shall be fed,’ Then he rang Fortnum & Mason and ordered two vanloads of loaves and fishes. ‘Sticketh it on the American Express card,’ he sayeth.

 

Or there were two members of the Borgia family that made it to Pope. Leonardo da Vinci worked for one of them, but became concerned when, as his colleague wrote, “All Rome was trembling. Each day there are at least four murders.” Eventually Leonardo fled when Pope had his best friend strangled. I wonder how the Vatican squares that with ”Thou Shalt Not Kill.” They must have answered it like a politician. “Look, at the time that commandment was written. We had no intention of killing. But then it became clear that, in order to fulfil our other commitments, and recover from the mess left by the previous government, there would have to be a small rise in strangling. And if you read the whole of that original tablet of stone you’ll find Mosses did actually make provision for modest levels of garrotting.

 

Perhaps the ceaseless traditions the new Pope will adhere to include the doctrine of Pope Gregory XVI, who declared in1832 that democracy was sinful, and freedom of the press was “heretical vomit”. And decreed that any Jews who insulted Catholicism should be killed. Or maybe the rules of Pope Urban II, who had priests’ wives sold into slavery.

 

Then there was the vilification of science; the persecution of Galileo and attitudes that led Isaac Newton to believe the Pope was anti-Christ. All these rules were based on eternal principles. So, if the new Pope’s going to stick to papal traditions, he could manage to be the one person in history of whom it could be said as a child he was in the Hitler Youth, but once he grew up he went further to the right.

 

The Catholic Church has proved ingenious at adopting its eternal truths. Finally giving in to the real world but not until it’s succeeded in holding back social advancement for three or four centuries. Just as eventually they’ll have to come to terms with divorce, women priests and condoms. It seems the one thing that never changes is their involvement in child abuse. It must be worth them formulating this by writing it into a canonical doctrine, so a priest comes out and reads, “Kiddius fiddius our little secretum.” and makes the sign of cross.

 

No other institution could get away with reversing such a record, or to choosing its leader in such an archaic manner. Couldn’t they be prosecuted under an equal opportunities act for advertising a job to Catholics only? Surely there must be Jews, Muslims and atheists capable of doing the work. And there is the Health and Safety issue of what would happen if there was a real fire in the Vatican while the cardinals were choosing the Pope. They’d all be screaming for help, but the crowd outside would be cheering the smoke and trying to interpret its colour.

But this Pope could settle the social debate about what is natural, as ordained by God. Take a new born baby, isolate it from all human, and therefore sinful contact, and as it grows up, see what comes naturally to it first – transubstantiation or tossing itself off.

 

4.3 D-Day to Berlin – time for being realistic.

On 20 April 2005 Terry Ramsey TV editor wrote of the Evening Standard (p30) –

 

Unless you’re a Second World War fanatic you may be feeling all D-Day- ed out after last summer’s exhausting collection of programmes marking the 60th anniversary. But don’t let that put you off – because this new three part series is something different.

It charts what happened after the success of D-Day – a story sometimes glossed over in the history books as a simple march to victory but which, as this series illustrates, was anything but.

 

The Allied plan was to set off for Berlin, with the aim of capturing the German capital and bringing down Hitler. The mood was so optimistic that American General Eisenhower bet Britain’s General Montgomery £5 that the war would be over by Christmas – less than seven months after D-Day.

But it took the Allied forces a hard fought and bloody 33 days to capture the nearby French city of Caen – an objective originally set for D-Day itself. At one point there were a million men (from both sides) fighting on a front just 50 miles long.

 

The programme uses a blend of dramatic reconstructions and archive film to recreate the campaign, plus the recollections of an amazing range of interviewees – from members of Monty’s staff through American soldiers to German tank commanders.

Note – the series was shown on BBC1 at 2100 hrs on Wednesdays 20/27 April and 4 May 2005

 

4.4 History behind May Day

1st of May is celebrated as Labour Day in many countries. But very little is known about the history behind this day. On 30 April 2004, Daily Mail published a letter by one A D Williams of Holyhead. He explains –

With May Day imminent, we should remember what it represents. Our modern celebration of May Day as workers’ holiday evolved from the struggle for the eight-hour working day, which, on May 1, 1886, saw national strikes in U.S. and Canada.

 

In Chicago, police attacked the striking workers, brutally killing six. The next day, at a demonstration in Haymarket Square to protest against the police brutality, a bomb exploded in the middle of the police lines, killing eight of them. The police arrested eight trade unionists claiming they threw bombs, a matter of debate to this day.

In one of the most infamous show trials in the U.S. the State of Illinois tried them as much for fighting for workers’ rights as for throwing the bombs. Whether they were guilty or innocent was irrelevant: they were agitators, fomenting revolution and stirring up other workers and they had to be taught a lesson.

Albert Parsons, August Spies, George Engle and Adolph Fischer were found guilty and executed.

 

In Paris in 1889, the International Working Men’s Association (the socialist First International) declared May 1 an international workers’ holiday in commemoration of the Haymarket Martyrs – a holiday for the common people paid for by the sacrifice of activists.

The red flag became the symbol of blood split by workers in their battle for rights against both state and capital.

 

4.5 Pagan celebrations predate Christmas day

An interesting letter appeared in the Metro on 21 December 2004. Mr Paul Nelson of Surrey wrote –

Federico Moscogiuri mentions that Christmas is a secularised Christian holiday (Metro, Friday 17 December 2004). But how Christian is it really?

The early Christians never celebrated it, the Bible doesn’t tell people to observe it, and the biblical references to shepherds tending their flocks indicate that there is no way that Christ was born on December 25 in winter. This date was originally celebrated by pagans in the North who refused to stop their winter solstice celebration to celebrate the return of the sun. Pagans in the South celebrated the birth of Mithras (a God predating Jesus) on December 25.

 

Our current traditions of festive singing, exchanging presents and having Christmas trees again hark back to the pagans. They decorated their evergreen trees with decorations, food and runes to help keep the tree spirits close to their village, sang joyous songs and swapped presents. The Christian authorities tried for years to stamp this out; so the pagans merely took their trees indoors, which is why we are still doing it to this day.

 

I find it fascinating that we are still following these traditions now, with the large majority of us having no idea of their true origin.

 

 

 

4.6 Americans today

An interesting news item appeared in The Metro paper on 20 May 2005 (p17).

It deals with the treatment meted out to actress Jane Fonda and reads –

 

For further proof that Americans sure are gung-ho when it comes to patriotism, look at the indignities heaped upon former Vietnam was protester Jane Fonda, in her efforts to flog her new film Monster-In-Law. First, she had, chewing tobacco spat in her face by Vietnam veteran at a recent promotional event and now the former keep-fit guru has been run out of Kentucky. Ike Boutwell, who owns the two cinemas in Hardin County, Kentucky, won’t show Fonda’s new comedy, co-starring Jennifer Lopez, ‘because I can’t stand a traitor.’ Yee haw.