INDIAN INSTITUTE FOR TRUE HISTORICAL RESEARCH

 

Newsletter No. 6 of 16 February 1982

 

Dear Mr

 

We have now completed 2 years of our existence. There are 20 members in UK and 1 member in Italy. We have assumed a new name which is more appropriate and it may help us in getting registered as a charitable institution in U.K.

 

1. Mr. Godbole   (0234-57388)

 

1.1       Correspondence

 

Letters were sent to -

Professors of Architecture in Europe, Japan and U.S.A.  (Expenses were paid by Mr. K. Kapoor of Southampton)

 

 

President of Caribbean Hindu Centre, London.

 

 

Editors of Des Pardes and Garvi Gujrat requesting them to publish Godbole's analysis.  Mr. B. Patel is to pursue

the matter with Garvi Gujrat.

 

 

Mr. Bhide of R.S.S. Kenya, in appreciation of his Diwali greeting card.

 

 

Mr. Deshpande, a former UN expert on International Trade.  But like many other high ranking Hindus, he simply ducked the issue.

 

 

Mr. Sanjay Bhide, an architect and one of our new life members from Bombay.

 

1.2 The Economist weekly (7 Nov.1981) recently carried a review of John Keay's new book "India Discovered".  Mr. Keay comes very near to Mr. Oak's findings and yet fails to grasp the crux of the matter viz the entire concept of Indo Saracenic Architecture is baseless. A letter was sent to the editor explaining how British Authorities had consistently suppressed the truth about Taj Mahal and other monuments.

 

1.3 Due to sad demise of his father Mr. Godbole had to visit India in December 1981.  At that time he met Mr. Oak, Dr. Sharma, Dr. Bhide and others and visited the monuments in Delhi and Agra.

Mr. B. Patel also had to visit India at the same time for a similar reason.  Mr. Gidwani also went there for a holiday.  A report on their visit will appear in the next newsletter.

1.4 As stated in Newsletter No. 4, writing up of THE GREAT BRITISH CONSPIRACY is now complete. This 76 page document sets out the formidable evidence in a chronological order.  Copies were given to Mr. Oak, Mr. Athavale (Kanpur) and Mr. JeevanKulkarni (Bombay).

 

Mr. Godbole's analysis is now being revised.

 

1.5 Mr. Godbole's analysis of the Taj Legend was published in the December 1981 issue of EKATA, a Marathi monthly from Poona, run by the R.S.S.  We are grateful to Mrs. Ambikar of Poona for her efforts.

 

1.6 After a delay of more than one year Friends of India Society have expressed their inability to publish Mr. Godbole's analysis.

 

Research findings

 

1.7 Rambagh at Agra is a Hindu Structure

 

The originally painted wall surfaces of the baradari in the Rambagh or Aram Bagh traditionally ascribed to Babur and later associated also with Jahangir and Nurjahan had previously been extensively plastered over (by whom ?)  The flaking of the plaster revealed at a few places the underlying paintings, a part of which was carefully exposed. In the lintel on the baradari to the north a series of spirited and life like animal figures were noticed. In one of the niches a fine painting of a lady similar to the so called Madona at Fatehpur Sikri, also came to light -----                                         (Indian Archaeology 1957-58. Page 83)

 

Excavation at Rambagh

A red sandstone amalaka of a temple of early mediaeval period was discovered.

(Indian Archaeology 1976-77 page ^9)

 

Indian Archaeology is an annual published by the Archaeological Survey of India.  They will go to all lengths but never admit that Rambagh was a Hindu structure; misused by Mughals.

 

1.8 Hindu Garden Palaces

 

---- Again as bearing on the other side of the argument I have now to mention that, on the right bank of the river about 5 miles above the fort there is the site of an ancient garden palace called the garden and palace of Raja Bhoj.  Certain intelligent educated Hindus in Agra say that it is traditionally held to have been a palace of the Raja Bhoj of Malwa of the 5th "to 6th centure; but at any rate all agree as to the fact that this garden palace of Raja Bhoj. was in existence previous to the Muhammadan conquest of this part of the country.

 

(Archaeological Survey of India.  Report for the year 1871-72, part 2 Agra by A.C.L.Carlleyle. page 4.)

 

So there were Hindu garden palaces, centuries before Muslim invaders come to India!

 

1.9  Native Muslims under Alien Muslim Rulers.

 

It is a great fallacy that Indian Muslims ruled India before the Marathas and the British.  Not only the Muslim rulers and ruling class were alien to India, but they also despised native Muslims.

 

1.9.1 Tavernier, the French jewel merchant, famous for his sentence "20,000 men worked on Taj Mahal for 22 years" tells us -

 

"--- Moreover the chiefs .are generally fugitives from Persia, people of no birth and of little heart, who attach themselves to those who give most ---" 

(Travels in India" by J.B.Tavernier - Edited by Dr.V.Ball, 1889 Vol.1 page 252)

 

In Volume II pages 176-177 he says -

"--- I have elsewhere remarked that of the native Muhammadan subjects of the Great Mogul there are but few in positions of command; this is the cause why many persians go to seek fortune in India.  Being clever they are successful in finding means to advance themselves in (the profession of) arms, so that in the Empire of the Great Mogul, as well as, in the kingdoms of Golconda and Bijapur, the Persians are in possession of the highest posts.--—"

 

1.9.2 Bernier, the French doctor, who stayed at Aurangzeb's court for eight years (1658-1665) tells us -

 

"-— The majority of his (Great Mogol's) courtiers are Persians. ---- Moreover the Great Mogol is a foreigner in Hindoustan — The court itself does not now consist as originally, of real Mogols, but a medley of Usbecs, Persians, Arabs and Turks or descendants from all these people; known, as 'I said before, by the general appellation of Mogols. It should be added however that children of the third and fourth generation, who have the brown complexion, and the languid manner of this country of their nativity are held in much less respect than new comers, and are seldom invested with official situations; they consider themselves happy, if permitted to serve as private soldiers in the infantry or cavalry.  (So what chance did the Indian Muslims have?)

If the Omrah's life be sufficiently prolonged, he may obtain the advancement of his children by royal favour, particularly if their persons be well formed, and their complexions sufficiently fair to enable them to pass for genuine Mogols.---"

(Travels in Mughal Empire by F. Bernier edited by V.Smith 1914 pp 209 to 212)

 

1.9.5     When the Bahamani Kingdom in Deccan split up into five; the three out of the five kings were foreigners. (c 1495), the other two were Hindu converts.

 

Yusuf Adil of Bijapur was a Turk

 

Kasum Berid of Bidar came from Georgia

 

Kulee Kutub was a Persian.

 

(Raja Shivachhatrapati by B.M.Purandare.  1974 edition, p34)

 

 

1.9.4     Encyclopaedia Britannica (1977 edition) tells us -

 

Akbar's administration (1556 to 1605)

The army - Mostly foreign in personnel, Akbar's army was originally composed of Mongols, Persians, Turks, Uzbeks and Afghans

(Where were the native Indian Muslims?)

 

(Macropaedia Volume 9 page 58!)

 

1.9.5  Chief Minister of Nizam of Ahmednagar was Malik Ambar (1605 to 1626) an Abassynian (Ethiopian)

 

1.9.6 Gias Beg a Persian came to India in last days of Akbar. His daughter (Mehrunnisa) Nur Jahan was married to Jahangir. His son Asaf Khan became Prime Minister of Jahangir and continued in that position under Shahjahan.  His second son Itiquad Khan was Subedar of Delhi in 1635.

 

Asaf Khan's son Shaista Khan (whose fingers were cut by Shivaji) held various high offices under Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb.

 

Shaista Khan's son Buzurg Ummed Khan was Subedar of Bihar (1683-1692)

 

Mir Shihabuddin was one of high generals of Aurangzeb. He came from Samarkand to seek his fortune at the court of Delhi - Oct. 1669

 

Mirza Miuzz a Persian of Mashhad  married to a sister of Aurangzeb's wife.  He was created Musai Khan and Diwan of the Pay Office Sept 1688.  Diwan of Deccan June 1689.

 

Muhammad Amu Khan came to India from Bukhara, in 1687. He rose to-the position of Sadr in 1698, Chin Bahadur in 1706 and a Commander of 4000 horse in 1707.

 

Mir Jumla was a similar adventurer. He became Prime Minister of Golconda.  Later on betrayed the King of Golconda and joined the Mughals in last days of Shahjahan.  His son Muhammad Amin Khan Hafiz was made Mir Bakshi (Chief of all cavalary) by Aurangzeb; and was later made Governor of Gujrat 1672-1682.

 

(Ref. Anecdotes of Aurangzeb and Historical Essays by Yadunath Sarkar published by M.C.Sarkar and Sons 1912)

 

1.9.7  While describing some of Aurangzeb's campaigns in the Deccan

1682-1707, Historian Setu Madhavrao Pagdi mentions following foreigners

 

Siege of Vishalgarh.

 

Muhammad Khan - a Turk of 5000 horse.  He came to India from Bukhara in 1686.  His cousin Gaziuddin Phirozjung was a General of the Mughals.

(Ref. Diwali issue of Lokasatta 1977)

 

1.9.8     Was the first Nizam (1671-1748) born and brought up in India? No. He came from Bukhara (in Central Asia) to seek his fortune in India around 1710, become Subhadar of the Deccan in 1713.

 

1.9.9. Nizam All's minister Ghulam Saiyad Khan, called Mushir-ul-mulk came from Persia and secured service under Salabat Jang (Nizam's Chief Minister) around 1754 and became the first minister in 1775.

(New History of the Marathas by G.S.Saradesai 1956 Vol.111 pp 281-8)

 

Aliwardi Khan, a Turk came to India in 1726 became principal military officer and was awarded Mahabat Jang title by the Mughal Emperor

 

Mir Habib was a clever Persian of Shiraz. He rose to deputy governorship of Orissa (c 1740)

 

(New History of the MarathasVol.11 page 221)

 

The list is endless. What a pity Gandhiji and Nehru did not know this true history If it is taught; even today, it will have a tremendous psychological impact on Indian Muslims. Historian Setu Madhavrao Pagdi delivered a lecture on this subject at a largely Muslim audience at Bhiwandi (near Bombay) on the occasion of Shivajayanti in Feb. 1977. The reaction of Muslim leaders was remarkable.  They said "It would have been much better had such lectures been delivered in the past". (SOBAT, weekly from Poona 13 May 1977). We congratulate

Mr. Pagdi !

 

 

 

1.10  Nehru and Sanskrit

Was Nehru ignorant about Sanskrit?  We do not think so. In his book "Discovery of India" he tells us - (pp 164 to 170)

 

Vitality and Persistence of Sanskrit

 

Sanskrit is a language amazingly rich, efflorescent, full of luxuriant growth of all kinds, and yet precise and strictly keeping within the framework of grammer which Panini laid down..

 

 --- Sir William Jones observed as long ago as 1784 "The Sanskrit language is of a wonderful structure, more perfect than the Greek, more copious than the Latin, yet bearing to both of them a stronger affinity both in the roots of verbs and in the forms of grammer, than could possibly have been produced by accident.  So strong indeed, that no philosopher could examine them all without behiving them to have sprung from some common source which perhaps no longer exists ---"

 

— Practically every German University had a Sanskrit department, with one or two professors in charge of it.

 

 -- Sanskrit is still used for some ceremonial purposes in Thailand (Siam).  In India the vitality of Sanskrit has been amazing---

 

--- Speaking at the Oriental Conference held in 1937 at Trivendrum, Dr. F.F. Thomas pointed out what a great unifying force Sanskrit had been in India and how widespread its use still was. He actually suggested that a simple form of Sanskrit, a kind of basic Sanskrit, should be encouraged as a common all - India language today! He quoted, agreeing with him, what Max Muller had said previously.

 

 --- Simple spoken Sanskrit is not very difficult to follow for those who know well any of the present day Indo Aryan languages - Hindi, Bengali, Marathi, Gujrati etc.  Even present day Urdu itself wholly an Indo-Aryan language, probably contains 80% words derived from Sanskrit. It is often difficult to say whether a word has come from Persian or Sanskrit, as the root words in both these languages are alike. Curiously enough, the Dravidian languages of South, though entirely different in origin, have borrowed and adopted such masses of words from the Sanskrit that nearly half their vocabulary is very nearly allied to Sanskrit.

 

--— It is interesting to note that in modern Thailand when the need arose for new technical, scientific, and governmental terms, many of these were adapted from Sanskrit.

 

 -- Pashto, one of the Indo-Aryan languages derived from Sanskrit is the popular language in the North West Frontier Province as well as in Afghanistan.

 --- The language of Ceylon is Sighalese.  This is also an Indo-Aryan language derived directly from Sanskrit ---

 

--- Sanskrit it is well recognised, is allied to the European classical and modern languages.  Even the Slavonic languages have many common forms and roots with Sanskrit. The nearest approach to Sanskrit in Europe is made by the Lithuanian language.

 

P 197 - I.tsing himself a fine scholar in Sanskrit, praises the language and says it is respected in far countries in the north and south -—- (He came to India in 671 A.D. and studied at Nalanda University)

 

Sanskrit scholarship must have been fairly widespread in China, It is interesting to find that some Chinese scholars tried to introduce Sanskrit phonetics into the Chinese language.  A well known example of this is that of monk Shon Wen, who lived at the time of the T'ang dynasty.  He tried to develop an alphabetical system along these lines in Chinese —--

------------

We cannot, therefore, agree with opinions expressed in our annual report of 1981.  If we read "Veer Savarkar" by Dhananjay Keer (published by Popular Prakashan, Bombay 1966) we gather from pages 507/8 that Nehru's government accepted almost all the Sanskrit words suggested by Savarkar but never acknowledged the fact.  Thus the motto of Indian Navy is Sham No Varunah (Let Varuna, the lord of the seas, protect us) that of Indian Air Force Nabhaah sparsham diptam. Nehru accepted thousands of words like Sansad, (Parliament) Loksabha (House of Commons) Rajyasabha (Upper house), Rajyapal (Governor), Sachivalaya (Secretariat).

 

1.11 History Today

 

Sindhis of Poona (Pune) have recently started Sindhi Cultural and Fine Arts Foundation.  Speaking at the press conference Mr.Vishnu Shahani said,"We came here as refugees in 1947.  Mr. Balasaheb Kher then Chief Minister of Bombay told us that we should not have left Pakistan.  When we told our horrifying tales, he felt sorry but said that the government could not do much to help us.--—--- Gujratis have Gujrat, Punjabis have Punjab, it is only us who have no linguistic state We are spread all over India.  We have started this foundation in order to preserve our language, literature and arts".  (18 April 1981)

 

We wish them well !  But we feel dismayed by their neglect of study of their history and history of India over last 1000 years.  They should be asking themselves - why did we have to leave our homeland? What would happen to us if the present menace of Christian missionaries on one hand and Muslim Mullas on the other hand continues unchecked? Would we be refugees again?

 

Let us recapitulate the events. Under the Government of India Act of 1935; Sind was separated from Bombay. Veer Savarkar warned the Sindhis of the disastrous consequences of such an act. As he was still in internment he could do no more.  But the Sindhi leaders Ghanashyam and Jairamdas thought that it was a Maharashtrian dodge to keep them under the Bombay province; and did not heed the warning.

 

And what happened after formation of Muslim League Government in Sind?  Mr. Allabaksha the Chief Minister of Sind admitted - Ten Hindus were burned to death; 150 Hindus were killed, property of thousands of Hindus was looted. 

(Ref. Presidential address of Veer Savarkar - Tamilnad Hindu Parishad - Salem 25 March 1940)  The same story continued day in and day out until all Hindus were expelled/ exterminated from Sind.

 

Would our Sindhi brothers awaken even today and support our cause generously?  Would they support the efforts of re-conversion of Muslims and Christians on a grand scale?

 

In case you wish to contact Mr. Vishnu Shahani, his address is  -

Modern Book Stall

1 Thimayya Road

Pune 411001.

 

 

2. Mr. Mukesh Patel (01. 452-5900)

His wife recently visited India.  She took with her several letters from Mr. Godbole and posted them in India.  Such assistance is always welcome; especially as the postage for overseas air-mail has become very expensive.

 

3. Mr. S.G.Kulkarni (0252-710050)

 

He wrote to Indian Heritage Society, New Delhi and asked whether the society intends to carry out any tests on Taj Mahal to to determine its true age and nature, in view of Mr. Oak's findings. The Secretary Mr. G. Naqshband replied "Mr. Oak's article was not very well received in India - His theory has not been proved correct ---".

 

He also noticed an article in The Sunday Times of 8 Nov.1981 repeating traditional lies (Ticket t.o the Taj Mahal) .  Mr. Godbole took up the matter with Mr. Brian Jackman, Travel Correspondent of The Sunday Times, and suggested that if he wanted to see Taj Mahal again in view of our research work, it can be arranged.  Mr. Jackman replied that should he wish to write on Taj Mahal again he would take up our offer.

 

4. Mr. Bhupendra K.Patel (01 203-4408)

Dr. M.M.Gandhi is an influential Gujrati leader in Luton. Mr. Patel tried to contact him, but without much success.  Dr. Gandhi did not reply to our letters.

 

During his visit to Taj Mahal, last year, Mr. Patel wore a T Shirt with the slogan "Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya" printed on it. Such an action is well worth imulating.

 

5. Information required by Mr. Oak.

 

(1). Cairo Public Library (Egypt) has books on pre-Islamic  civilisation.  These contain photographs of Hindu dieties. Details of such books (Title, name of author, publisher,  date of publication) and Xerox copies of relevant pages are required.

 

(2). Frontal photograph of sphinx is also required.

 

(3). On various buildings around Westminster Abbey -there are lotuses embossed on front entrances. Details of the buildings and photos are required.

 

(4). Paris was called Parisorium (corruption of Parameshwariyam? in 52 B.C. Further research needs to be done.

 

(5). Photographs of following are also required.

Westminster Abbey - Various statues with hands folded in namaste position

Saint Paul’s             - Sudarshan Chakra on Central Altar

                                 - Perambulatory passage

                                  - Garud (Eagle) at front of the Church.

 

(6). Apparently St Paul’s was a Pagan (Vishnu?) temple until 6th century. Is there such a notice? Further research is needed.

 

(7).  Detailed information is required on following

       Pre-Christian history of the Vatican

       Pre-Christian history of the Romans

       Legend of the Lion hearted

 

If you can help please write to him directly and keep Mr. Godbole informed.

 

6. Books to Read

 

6.1  New History of the Marathas by G.S.Sardesai, Phoenix Publication,

Bombay 1956

 

Veer Savarkar requested famous historian Govind Sakharam Sardesai to write the History of the Marathas in English, so that Non-Maharashtrians may read it.  This was in 1926. Twenty years later this book, in three volumes came out (Sardesai was then 80 years old) Second edition was published ten years later.  There is a copy in India Office Library. A "must" for any student of Mediaeval History of India.

 

6.2 Veer Savarkar by Dhananjaya Keer; Popular Prakashan, Bombay 1966.

 

An excellent biography of a tragic hero of our freedom struggle.  Most of the details given in the book are systematically suppressed by successive-congress governments.  It must be read not only by us but by our progenies as well.  There is a copy in the School of Oriental and African Studies, London.

 

6.3 India's War of Independence 1857 by Veer Savarkar (Vinayak Damodar)

 

This research work was written by Savarkar when in London in 1907.  Quoting extensively from various English authors he exposed the falsity of the legend of "The Sepoy Mutiny" and emphasised that it was our war of independence.  The book was promptly proscribed by British authorities.  Our freedom fighters published various editions of this book in various languages, and during many trials (Bhagatsingh to I.N.A soldiers) it was revealed that thousands of them were inspired by this book.  Circumstances forced even Nehru to admit this and celebrate the centenary of this war in May 1957.

 

In the preface Savarkar writes - It is my great desire that a complete, extensive, detailed account of this war should be written by Indian writers and this work of mine should become insignificant before their work. Savarkar's desire was not fulfilled.  Neither Government of India nor any Historical Society has felt it worth while to commence such a task.  What an ungrateful nation!

 

A copy of this book is available in School of Oriental and African Studies, London.

 

 

7.  Annual Report 1981

 

Note - What follows is not a personal criticism of Mr. Oak only his style.

 

Our Comments/Suggestions.

 

7.1 The Annual Report should now be called JOURNAL of our institute

 

7.2 Name of our institute should be changed to Indian Institute for True Historical Research.(or some such similar name) as rewriting of history has usually a sinister meaning in people's minds.  Hitler and Stalin rewrote history to suit their ideologies.  We do not want to rewrite history on similar lines.  At the other end many people associate rewriting history with correcting minor details.  For example was Shivaji born in l62? or 1650?  Rewriting does not convey the meaning that we seek sensible interpretation of events using common sense, reason and logic and insist on fundamental changes in our history.

 

7.3  The information should be arranged according to U.C.C.

(Universal Classification Code).  At least following sequence should be

followed -

 

A

Taj Mahal

 

B

News

 

C

Indian History - Ancient

                         Mediaeval

                         Modern

 

D

World History  - Ancient

                          Mediaeval

                           Modern

 

E

History of Architecture

 

F

Book Reviews

 

G

Coming events

 

H

Institution Affairs i.e. elections, new members, accounts etc.

 

 

7.4 The main purpose of our work is to show how our history has been twisted and distorted, how it has affected our mentality and how true history can help us in reducing communal tension, lead to better understanding between various sections of our society; correct appraisal of present day problems; regenerate self confidence in ourselves etc.

 

Mr. Oak should have written few pages on how his view of world Vedic heritage fits into our purpose of work.

 

7.5  Lack of continuity -

Our members do not seem to have the patience to see our work through. Our Annual Report for 1976 carries news of Vishnu's Footprints in Humayun's tomb.  Dr. P.B.Sharma (now at Delhi) noticed them in a book... Now 5 years have passed. We are curious to know - Did anybody see the foot prints?

                                                     - Did anybody write to Archaeological Survey of  

                                                      India?

                                                     - What was their reply ?

 

We traced the source of this information to a photographic archive in Paris and wrote to our sympathiser Mrs. Christine Roy, but received no reply.  We will now take up the matter with the archive authorities.

 

7.6 We are very disappointed to see that our work has been given no publicity.

 

7.7  Irrelevant Matters -

We do not see the relevance of following pieces of information

 

P22

The Rat Temple, Idol Makers

 

P23

Medical computer. Groom dowries. Modern News Agencies

 

P24

Balance of terror

 

P25

An ancient corpse, Shankaracharya Devotees

 

P26

Musk deer; Andamans

 

P28

Cow's Milk, Hindu Kabul, Torture

 

P29

World war II revenge

 

P31

Cold water from hot lands

 

P33

Lakshmi Durg in Europe

 

P34

Earliest recorded eclipse

 

P35

Two centuries of Indian newspapers

 

PP 53/54

Historical Humour, Epigrams

 

7.8       Greatness of Islam (page 32)

 

There is no reason why we should feel sorry for the American women.  Americans know the true nature of the Pakistanis. They have been arming Pakistanis for last 30 years with the deliberate intention of imposing a crippling burden of soaring defence costs on India's precious little resources, and thus reducing the money available for economic development.  Even after the said event there is no change in America's policy.  As you sow so shall you reap.

 

7.9 Letters to presidents of Institutes of Architects in USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

 

 The very first sentence is disastrous - (I am approaching you on a matter which may not be of modern professional relevance -—-) Any reader will react - If the matter is not of relevance today, why bother?

 

7.10 There should be at least a two inch gap between successive letters.

 

7.11 Letters in the RIBA journal. Though this journal is read by thousands of Architects and Historians throughout the world no one has dared to challenge our letters. This vital information is missing.

 

7.12 Oriental Roots of Occidental life

 

Mr. Oak begins,"--- In this paper I propose to lead comprehensive evidence to prove that from times immemorial up to the commencement of the Christian era Sanskrit language and the Vedic way of life formed a common world heritage.---".  Such beginnings abound in Mr. Oak's writing and are at the root of why his work is not accepted by the scholars.

 

Does a lawyer begin the defence of his client by saying, "Now I am going to prove that my client is innocent"? No. He states the events. Gives his reasons for accepting or rejecting various pieces of evidence; produces his analysis and then concludes that his client is innocent.

 

Would a scientist start his paper with the sentence - Now I am going to prove that there is iron in this sample?  The answer is No. At the most he would say - I have been instructed to find out if there is iron in this sample.  He would then tell us of the various tests he carried out and then come to his conclusion. If he concludes that iron is present, he would also carry out some confirmatory tests.

 

Thus Mr. Oak's style is neither that of a lawyer nor that of a research scholar (see newsletter No.2) and as a result he does not get the recognition he deserves. We deplore this state of affairs.

 

7.15  Some Explanations

 

(A)    The wealth of Hind 1650 (page 38)

In this article (Sir) Yadunath Sarkar describes various sources of income of  Shahjahan but does not tell us anything about his expenses.  This creates a false impression that everything was fine, just fine under Shahjahan.

 

-- Encyclopaedia Britannica tells us - Shahjahan raised the land revenue from 33% to 50%. (Hardly a sign of prosperity!)  See the 1974 edition, volume I

page 384.

 

 -- Another author tells us - Shahjahan introduced the practice of paying salaries to the mansabdars for only 4 months of the year instead of 12. (i.e. reduced their pay by 70%.-  Again not a sign of plenty!)

Ref. -  Edwardes and Garrett - Mughal Rule in India p 170

 

-- Yet another author tells us - Shahjahan reduced the number of court painters, keeping only the very best and forcing others to seek the patronage of the princes and the nobles.

 (in other words Shahjahan could not afford to keep the painters of his father's days.)  Ref. - Muslim Civilization in India by S.M.I Kram edited by A.T.Embree.  Columbia University Press London 1969, page 250.

 

We can give many details like this.  Need we say anything more about Yadunath Sarkar - the historian?

 

(B) Forced Conversions by Sufis. - (page 44)

Mr. Pagdi's article appeared in the 1979 Diwali issue of SOBAT a weekly from Poona.  Once again we should be grateful to him for exposing the fallacy of commonly held belief that Sufis were nice, quiet chaps who converted Hindus to Islam by peaceful persuasion only.  He refers to "Sufis of Bijapur" by Richard Maxwell Eaton, published in 1978 by. Princetown University Press, Princetown, New Jersey, U.S.A. Our members must read this book.

 

8 NEWS

 

8.1 Financial Help to Mr. Oak -

 

As suggested in Newsletter No. 2, a sum of Rs. 550 was paid to Mr. Oak.  The contributions were - Mr. Godbole     £ 7

                                Mr. B. Patel      £20

                                Mr. R. Terparia £ 5

                                  Total               £ 32

 

We intend to send similar contributions every year.  Please send your remittance to Mr. Godbole at 54 Sudeley Walk, Bedford, MK41 8JJ

 

8.2 Change in Telephone Number

 

Mr Oak may now be contacted on Delhi 644142 or 642545.

 

8.3 Obituary

 

We regret to announce the death of Mr. Dattaprasanna Katdare our life member from Lonavia (near Bombay).  He was the courageous editor of Marathi monthly "VASANT".

 

8.4 Bigotted Historians

 

Unable to counter our arguments Bamber Gascoigne (TV presentetor of university challenge) refuses to see us.  He wrote to Mr. Godbole "You can and I have no doubt you will put me down a bigot ---"

 

8.5  New Members

M/s S.G.Kulkarni and N.T.Gidwani, friends of Mr. Godbole have joined us.

 

8.6  Recognition at last

 

(A)  Ekata a Marathi monthly from Poona published an article by C.P.Bhishikar on P.N.Oak's Rewriting of History.  (Sept.1981)

 

(B)  Sanghavi Keshari College, Chinchwad (near Poona) holds discussion on essays by Professors, every month.  Professor Chittaranjan Damie read a paper on Veer Savarkar's Hindu Nationalism in August 1981.  Afterwards he was asked several questions.  One of them was - How can we ignore the enrichment of our culture by Muslims?  Replying Prof. Damie said, "We must examine such claims very carefully.  Lot of our history during Muslim/British occupation has been falsified.  For example take Taj Mahal.  We are told Shahjahan built it. But his own official chronicle Badshahnama makes no mention of it. Our history must be re-examined - impartially.  If it is proved that Muslims did enrich our culture we would accept it without any hesitation.  (Manoos weekly from Poona 15 August 1981)

 

(C)  The same issue of Manoos carries an editorial on front page entitled - Towards true history.  In it the editor Mr. Majagaonkar says ---- In 1944/5 many congress leaders denounced Subhashchandra Bose as a puppet of the Japanese, but it is now revealed that even leaders like Jayaprakasha Narayana , and Ram Manohar Lohia were secretly trying to contact Bose.  (See article by Shreepad Kelkar in Kesari, daily from Poona 1 August 1981) and yet the same congressmen denounced Veer Savarkar as recruiting agent of the British! Bose spoke as the supreme commander of the I.N.A. on Singapore Radio,"-— When due to misguided political whims and lack of vision almost all the leaders of Congress party have been decrying all the soldiers of the Indian Army as mercenaries, it is heartening to know that Veer Savarkar is fearlessly exhorting the youths of India to enlist in the Armed Forces. These enlisted youths themselves provide us trained men and soldiers for our Indian National Army

(25 June 1944)---—And now after 37 years true history is being recognised. Government of Maharashtra has announced plans to erect 204 monuments to commemorate those who died in armed struggles against the British. To mark the occasion a public meeting was held in Kranti Maidan, Bombay and the chief guest was Dinakar Hari Rajguru, brother of Shivaram Rajguru who was hanged with Shahid Bhagatsingh.

 

8.7 New Centre

 

We are very pleased to inform you that with 72 members a new centre has been set up at THANE (near Bombay), by Dr. Bedekar, Vilas Vaidya and others.  They are also starting a newsletter of their own. Their address is -

 

                   C/o Dr. V.V.Bedekar,

                       Shivashakti,

                       Dr. Bedekar Hospital,

                       Maharshi Karve Road,

                       Naupada,

                       THANE 400602

                       INDIA

                       Tel.No. Bombay 591438

 

Dr. Bedekar met Mr. Godbole on 4 January 1982,

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Sd/ N T Gidwami